Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Author: Alana G

Lessons from the Literature of AP Lit

Before I started high school, I was always reading. I would read whenever I could get the chance and as soon as I finished a book, I would start a new one. Once I started high school, I was busier, and I read less and less. The books we have read this year have reignited my love for reading and I am so grateful for the class. The books that impacted me the most during the year were Pride and Prejudice and Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead. These books have all taught me important lessons about myself and life.

I had already read Pride and Prejudice before reading it in class and I loved it when I initially read it. Reading it again and being able to analyze it on a deeper level was an impactful experience. Not only did it transport me to a different world, it also reminded me to follow your heart. When Lady Catherine was questioning Elizabeth and insinuating that she and her family were not good enough, Elizabeth held her ground and stayed calm. When Lady Catherine questioned why her family did not have a governess, Elizabeth stated that her mother was perfectly capable of taking care of all of them. Additionally, Elizabeth defied societal standards twice when she refused to marry Mr. Collins and again when she refused to marry Mr. Darcy. Both marriages would have given her and her family financial stability but they were not going to make her happy. She put her happiness and her values before other’s expectations of her. This is something that I think is important for me to remember because it can be hard to say no to others but Pride and Prejudice has served as a reminder that it is always important to value my happiness and uphold my values.

Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead was another impactful book that we read during the year. Janina stood strongly for her beliefs and did what she could to make a difference. She was perceived by others as weird and crazy but she kept fighting for humane treatment of animals and an end to poaching. Even when she was dismissed by men in power because they thought she was just a crazy old woman, she continued to fight for her beliefs. She showed that having any type of impact is important and that it does not matter what others think of you. At times, it is hard for me to believe that my actions will have any real impact but her determination to make a change, even if it only affected her small village, showed me that even small change is good change.

Overall, the books we have read for AP Lit have been entertaining and kept me reading throughout the school year. If I hadn’t taken the class, I most likely would have made excuses that I was too busy to read, and I would have read a lot less. Therefore, I am truly grateful for the class and the lessons I have learned because of it.

Sibling Rivalries in King Lear

In King Lear by Shakespeare, one of the main topics is family. We see a rivalry between Edmund and Edgar; Cordelia, Regan, and Goneril; and later, just Regan and Goneril. However, is it their fault or their fathers?

Edmund originally chooses to betray his brother because he wants to be the heir of the Gloucester name. However, could this have all been avoided had Gloucester treated his sons equally? We see at the very beginning of the play that Gloucester makes jokes about the circumstances that Edmund was born from. He would not have said this about Edmund’s mother, his wife, showing how different his treatment of his two sons is. I understand that at the time, Edmund legally was not able to inherit any titles or land and that it was not just Gloucester who called him a bastard. However, Gloucester still could have treated Edmund better and more like a legitimate son even though he legally was not. If he had, Edmund may not have had a raging jealousy and bad intentions towards Edgar and his father.

The next sibling rivalry is between Cordelia, Regan, and Goneril. At the beginning of the play, King Lear makes his daughters profess their love for him in order to inherit part of the kingdom. By doing this, he is inherently making his daughters compete for power and his love. Cordelia chooses not to compete in this way against her sisters but they do not feel the same; Regan even says that Goneril fell short during her profession of love. While they probably were already cunning on their own, this competition that was forced by Lear definitely created more distrust, tension, and betrayal between the sisters.

The final sibling rivalry we see is between Goneril and Regan as they fight over Edmund. While this may seem to be entirely caused by the two of them, I believe their father still had an effect. They had already been taught by their father in the beginning to do whatever they could to get power, and they see Edmund as the way to maintain their power. However, they would probably compete over Edmund either way because they were both attracted to him.

In the end, even though Gloucester and Lear both had parts in the harmful rivalries that ended with their children (except Edgar) dying, a change in the behavior may not have stopped them.

Should “This Is What Makes Us Girls” by Lana Del Rey be considered poetry?

“This Is What Makes Us Girls” is the last song on Lana Del Rey’s 2012 album, Born To Die. The album explores ideas of love, sadness, death, and risk. Many of the songs on the album are inspired by Lana’s real-life experiences, including “This Is What Makes Us Girls”. It is a very meaningful and powerful song, and should definitely be considered poetry.

“This Is What Makes Us Girls” is based on Lana’s real-life experiences as a teenager in a small town. The central theme of the song is that teenage girls often grow up too early or act older than they are, which comes with real consequences and makes them miss out on just being teenagers. She is writing this from the experience of her and her friends’ lives but the message can still be applied to teenage girls in general.

Throughout the song Lana emphasizes youth and innocence in order to establish the idea of how young and naive the girls are despite attempting to act older. In the beginning of the song she sings,

Sweet sixteen, and we had arrived

Walkin’ down the streets as they whistle, “Hi, hi!”

Sweet sixteens are a symbol of growing up and becoming a young woman, something that Lana and her friends leaned into, despite not legally being adults. They were already thinking they were adults when they were still young girls. She continues on to discuss the attention they received from presumably adult men who would catcall them.

Another example of the emphasis on innocence are the lyrics

While she starts to cry

Mascara running down her little Bambi eyes

“Lana, how I hate those guys”

Her friend is described as having running mascara which shows a way she is trying to make herself appear older. Even though many sixteen year old girls wear makeup, it generally has the effect of making one look older. However, this friend’s goal of looking older is not achieved because of her tears ruining her makeup. This showcases the central idea that these girls can try to be older but in the end they are still young girls. Lana describes her eyes as “Bambi eyes”. Bambi is a young deer from the Disney movie Bambi. Deer are seen as wide-eyed, innocent, and prey. By comparing her friend to Bambi, Lana is showing how she is prey to older men, leading into the next line. Her friend tells Lana that she “hate[s] those guys”. The “guys” are presumably, like the cat-callers, older men or men that took advantage of her naivety.

The chorus of the song is also an incredibly powerful addition to the message of the song. Some of the most important parts of it are

We all look for heaven and we put love first

Somethin’ that we’d die for, it’s our curse

Don’t cry about it, don’t cry about it

This is what makes us girls

We don’t stick together ’cause we put love first

These lines again emphasize how clueless and naive these girls are. They value love over their friendships and do not realize how it is harming them. The chorus shows that they do not have the maturity to value things other than boys and love.

Continuing on with the message of innocence, Lana describes another instance

Baby’s table dancin’ at the local dive

Cheerin’ our names in the pink spotlight

Drinkin’ cherry schnapps in the velvet night

Lana describes how her and her friends are again acting older than they are, dancing on tables and drinking alcohol. However, they are drinking cherry schnapps, a sweet drink. This choice emphasizes their youth again because even though they are acting like adults, they still drink sweet flavored alcohol because they do not like the taste of regular hard liquors and/or they cannot handle them.

One lyric that was particularly striking to me was when Lana describes her and her friends as:

A freshman generation of degenerate beauty queens

By describing them as a “freshman generation”, she shows that her and her friends are only a small part in the cycle. Soon, there will be other young girls that will do the same things as them and the cycle will continue. The syntax of the sentence is also very meaningful and adds another layer to the theme. The phrase “beauty queens” is a stereotypical label and these short words after “freshman generation of degenerate”-a string of long words- is noticeable. This sentence shows how other people view Lana and her friends versus what is actually happening. Her small town only sees them as beauty queens and probably thinks they are just reckless and self-absorbed teenage girls. However, they do not recognize the issues these girls are having and how their actions are hurting them.

Later in the song, Lana shows a different kind of negative outcome for her and her friends by saying:

I got sent away, I was wavin’ on the train platform

Cryin’ ’cause I know I’m never comin’ back

Here, Lana is being sent away from her small town, her friends, and their perilous lives. But more importantly, she is saying goodbye to her teenage years. After all the time her and her friends spent trying to not be teenage girls, she cries because she will never get to actually live as a teenage girl because when and if she returns, she will be an adult. This final layer of complexity is astounding because they naively wanted to be adults but ended up regretting not acting like teenagers.

The way that Lana displays innocence through actions, memories, and even Disney characters along with layering the complexities of the experience of teenage girls proves that this song is poetry.

Was It Wrong For Paul D to Compare Sethe to an Animal?

In Toni Morrison’s Beloved, Sethe tells Paul D the story of her getting away from Sweet Home and what she did to make sure her children would not have to live enslaved. Paul D is shocked by this news and tells her that what she did was wrong and there must have been another way. When she questions this, he tells her “You got two feet, Sethe, not four” (194). Here, he compares her actions to that of an animal. While it is true that animals such as hedgehogs and some fish kill their young, they also usually eat them. While this is an obvious difference between Sethe’s actions and animal actions, Sethe also killed her baby because of her horrific experiences, something animals that do the same thing do not have.

What Sethe did is not an animalistic action. When she was faced with an impossible choice of letting her children be taken back to Sweet Home or killing them and in effect, saving them, she chose what she thought would bring them the least pain. Sethe did what she did out of love; even Paul D tells her that her love is “too thick”. She did not want her children to have to endure the abuse of schoolteacher nor slavery in general. Sethe’s love, protection, and consideration of her children is what separates her actions from those of an animal, and she should not be judged harshly for what she did.

The Unanswered Questions of Exit West

In my opinion, Exit West by Mohsin Hamid is a fine book. However, throughout the novel (and after finishing it) I had multiple questions.

First, where did the doors come from? Nadia and Saeed simply hear about doors appearing to other places and more and more are supposedly popping up throughout the book. However, the question never gets answered. The readers do not get an answer of why or how these doors appeared in the first place. Was there a magical force or being creating them? Are they in a fantasy world? Perhaps Hamid was trying to make them represent the unexpected influx of migrants to other countries or another broader idea. Nevertheless, it still annoyed me that the readers never get to know why these doors appear. It also feels slightly lazy, as if Hamid is just dropping these doors into the book without knowing himself how they got there.

Second, why did the militants from Nadia and Saeed’s home country not take over other parts of the world? Furthermore, why did other terrorist groups not utilize the doors to take over other areas? These doors could lead to a lot of fighting and war but we never get a mention of it except for random massacres in Vienna. Were the militants not strong enough to take over other areas? Were national armies fighting against them after their attacks in Vienna? We simply don’t know.

Third, what are the governments’ responses to these doors? In London, the reader knows that there are barricades, the public response is not great, and there are soldiers around the main place migrants are, but we don’t know how the actual governments of the world are reacting. I think there’s a mention of world governments discussing the doors and trying to find out more about them but there is never more information about governmental reactions. Do they give up because they realize there’s no way to stop them? Do some countries heavily guard them?

Maybe Mohsin Hamid was intentionally leaving these questions unanswered but I still think the book would have been better had these questions been answered.

Mutual Recognition in Trust and The Stranger

Mutual recognition, the idea that individuality is reliant upon other’s recognition of you and your recognition of them, is present in both Trust by Hal Hartley and The Stranger by Albert Camus. However, compared to Trust, there is a lack of mutual recognition in the relationships portrayed in The Stranger.

In The Stranger, Meursault and Marie are in a relationship. However, it is clear that they see this relationship very differently. When Marie asks him if he wants to marry her, he doesn’t care. Additionally, he rarely says anything about her other than short comments about her looking pretty. Though we can assume Marie recognizes him as an individual based on her evident care for him throughout the book and during his trial, it seems that Meursault is lacking this recognition. The reader knows very little about Marie because of his lack of attention on her and his comments about her looks lead the reader to believe that he sees her as an object.

There is clear mutual recognition in Trust, a stark difference from The Stranger. In Trust, both Maria and Matthew care deeply about each other. They want one another to escape their toxic families so that they can live better lives. Matthew is willing to work a job he hates to give Maria a stable life and Maria is willing to risk her life to help save him. If they didn’t think of each other as individuals, neither of them would have done the things they did to support the other. Their relationship was one of mutual recognition, unlike Meursault and Marie’s.

Letting Go

I read “Sticks” in George Saunders’ Tenth of December before class one day because it was an extremely short story. Consisting of two paragraphs and barely taking up two pages, many would think it lacks meaning. I definitely did not think it would be as thought-provoking as it was.

In whole, the story demonstrates how something important to you can be totally meaningless to someone else. The story centers around a child’s view of their father and a cross-shaped pole in their front lawn that he decorates for holidays and other events. It is clear that he cares tremendously about this pole but even his own children don’t understand his obsession. He gave his time and energy to the decorating the pole even as he grew old and sick. Once he dies and the house is sold, the new owners take out the pole and leave it on the side of the road. Even though the pole was possibly the most important thing in his life, from a different perspective it is trash. It is a hard lesson to accept because it can seem unimaginable for something so vital in our life to be nothing to someone else but the truth is, most of the things we care about don’t mean anything to others.

Additionally, the father’s habit of being stingy (and his later regret of it) tie into his obsession with the pole. Both infatuations are not beneficial for him: his stinginess and resultant cruelty and restriction create tension in his relationships with his children and decorating the pole consumes him more and more. I believe this can be translated into everyday life by comparing it to negative feelings we hold on to. Getting a bad grade on a test or not performing well in a sport are negative things that many people tend to hold onto and obsess over. However, in the end holding onto these feelings only ends in two ways: regret or the eventual realization that it doesn’t matter. This short story teaches us through the father’s mistakes and experiences that we must let go of the things that do not benefit us.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén