Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: Empathy

WOW Zendaya “ALL FOR US” + Emily Dickinson “THERE’S BEEN A DEATH AT THE OPPOSITE HOUSE”

There is a particular kind of narrative voice that chills and captivates simultaneously. The observer who watches events unfold not with surprise but with the quiet almost predetermined knowledge of the ending. This perspective is both captured in Labyrinth and Zendaya’s song “ALL FOR US” in the album Imagination & the Misfit Kid and Emily Dickinson’s poem “There’s been a Death in the Opposite House.” Both pieces place us in the shoes of speakers who witness heavy moments in their commentary especially with an awareness of inevitability.

 

In “All For Us” , the speaker, through a depressing tone, narrates the lives of people in a cycle of internal and external destruction. The lyrics paint a picture of the speaker being all knowing and telling of a consumed path laid out with certainty. The speaker observes the choices being made, the external pressures and the internal struggles all while maintaining her stance of suggesting this outcome was observed and even unavoidable.  There’s a sense of watching a play where the Final Act is already written in the observer is merely recounting the unfolding tragedy. This experience of witnessing such a descent can be both broadening and depending. Broadening by exposing them to the complexities of human vulnerability and external forces that can shape a life. Deepening by fostering empathy for those caught in such struggles promoting contemplation on one’s own choices and resilience.

 

Similarly Dickinson’s poem presents an observer on the opposite side of the house where a death has occurred.  The speaker nonchalantly details the proceedings occurring after the death. It states “I know it, by the numb look such houses have”(3-4) and through the poem stating things that would happen as if he knows such as “A Window opens like a Pod – Abrupts- mechanically”(7-8) but he talks almost detachment there’s no shock or raw emotion in the telling instead there’s a calm recitation of events the recognition of the familiar ritual surrounding death.  The Observer notes the way the world seems to pause(all attention goes to the house) all with an understanding that this is simply how such an event is marked. The poem implies a universal understanding of dead survival and its immutable nature. 

 

Both pieces capture a distinctly romantic spirit and poetic appreciation of experiences in the wonder of existence. Dickinson’s poem with its dark imagery and precise ceremonial detailing of grief creates the intense characteristic of romantic poetry. The focus on the inner experience of observation and the stillness that follows a significant event aligns with the Romantic fascination. Labrith’s song too taps into its exploration of overwhelming emotional setting and the sense of inescapable destiny. .

For poetic language, “All for us”, “All for love” is repetition. The constant repetition of those words is like unity and shared experiences/responsibility. Each of the things she mentioned in something someone is struggling with in life therefore it makes sense for there to be an understanding. It also builds emotional intensity. It is also in its way memorable because of how many times it is repeated. 

 

There is a metaphor in the lyric “No food in the kitchen(famine, Famine)” and it is a powerful one. They aren’t literally experiencing famine like in history books but the feeling of extreme, lack of starvation and desperation is so intense that famine is used to describe the situation. 

The mention of “Micheal Corleone” is an allusion to the character from “The Godfather.” Micheal Corleone is known for being a protector and provider for his family, often through drastic means. SO saying “Better be a man(Micheal Corleone)” implies the need to step up, be strong, and take care of things, just like the character. 

Both “ALL OF US” and “There’s been a Death in the Opposite House” use a narrative voice that feels both intimate and distant. The speakers are deeply absorbed in the scene yet detached from the emotional aspects making the story feel faded. They are the witnesses who see the final curtain fall.

More Than a Horse Laugh: How BoJack Horseman Uses Satire to Cut Deep.

BoJack Horseman at first glance seems like another animated comedy with talking animals but beneath the surface is a satire of contemporary culture. It uses humor to get into complex issues challenging viewers to confront uncomfortable truths. The show “light” or thing it does well is its ability to blend silly jokes with deep thoughts about the human condition, making it far more than just a simple cartoon.

The show successfully equips several satirical techniques. Irony is a repetitive one, such as BoJack Horseman, a sitcom star, dealing with depression. There is also the Juxtaposition of bright animation with dark story lines which adds on to the irony.  For example, the episode where BoJack Horseman delivers a eulogy at his mother’s funeral, is filled with dark ironic humor, as he struggles to connect with her even in death. Episode called “free churro.”

Hyperbole exaggerates Hollywood’s celebrity self absorption. Princess Carolyn’s nonstop drive and chaotic work life are hyperbolized to show the entertainment industry’s craziness. The show also uses understatement to highlight the disconnect between outward appearances and inner issues. BoJack Horseman often deflects serious issues with changing remarks, masking his deep pain. This is evident in his relationships, where he downplays his destructive behavior creating a sense of dark humor that underscores his emotional struggles.

BoJack Horseman’s satire goes beyond Hollywood, addressing societal issues. The show portrays mental illness, with BoJack Horseman dealing with depression a ND addiction with honesty. As well as how BoJack Horseman struggles are often dismissed and misunderstood. It also talks about past trauma which has shaped how the characters are now(Sarah Lynn). I find it so interesting how this show reflects how life is right now in the state of the world right now. The entertainment industry is depicted perfectly in this, especially how much people get exploited specifically at a young age.

The show suggests that change starts with acknowledging the social problems and committing to doing better striving for a more compassionate and understanding world.

Beyond the Cringe: Why “PEN15” is a Masterpiece of Dramatic Comedy.

On the surface, PEN15 seems like another cringe and comedy especially since two grown women are playing 13 year old surrounded by actual middle schoolers. But trust me, this show is so much more than that yes it will be an overload of awkwardness but Maya Erskine and Anna Konkle actually enhance the viewers understanding of adolescence, identity and the messy world of growing up.

What makes PEN15 so real is the show captures that awkwardness, insecurity and emotional intensity of middle school with accuracy. In the episode “First Day” Maya and Anna desperately attempt to fit in especially regarding their outfits. It’s so relatable because why did as children do we need other kids validation for? Although it is something that occurs during all stages of life it just makes me think why we truly need validation from other lame children. PEN15 is not afraid to show us cringe moments but it also doesn’t shy from genuineness in finding who you are.

Beyond the awkwardness PEN15 gets into deeper themes of identity and social dynamics. Maya’s Japanese-American heritage is a motif that shows up continuously. It highlights her struggle to connect with he cultural background while also trying to fit in. I remember the episode where there was another Japanese student who visited her family and all the students loved her and called her cute(her name is Ume). It was a “why does it look good on her but not me” moment that I know many people can resonate with. Maya tries to downplay the Japanese girl and even Anna when she what Ume said about Anna’s nose being big.

On the other hand, Anna’s exploration of her sexuality and her attempts to define herself outside of her parents’expectations resonates with anyone who felt like they do not belong. Lets not forget the social hierarchies of middle school, the friendships, rivalries, and cliques that can make or break your day.

I have 2 good scenes that I like, one was when Anna and Maya stole a thong from a girl in their grade and enjoyed sharing it because it brought more attention and confidence from guys. This plays into the dramatic comedy satire thing. The next is the scene when they go shopping with their moms. They get upset that they cant get something and begin to be rude to their mothers going as far as insulting and throwing a tantrum.

Overall PEN15 is not just a comedy, it is an insightful look at the challenges and success of growing up. It reminds us of the ways in which they shape our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. So if you have veer though it is just another cringe comedy, take a close look.

Rose In The Winter

The name of my song is “ROSE IN THE WINTER” by artist Millkzy, from the album EVER SINCE SHEFFIELD. The song describes Millkzy’s feelings towards the emotion of love and how much pain past experiences with it has brought him, he doesn’t use any specific events within his life though. The lyrics throughout the song are meant to seem deeply personal while still being unspecific enough to be universally relatable for his audience. His calm yet saddened tone goes perfectly along with the subtle piano in the background, giving a very melancholy and nostalgic vibe. As throughout the song he describes that even though the emotion called love brought him so much pain, being able to experience such a pleasant feeling, even if it was fleeting, is addictive. He uses metaphors and even goes as deep as personifying the emotion of love for the audience.

A conversation bout what love is-The thing that made addictions before drugs did.

 And now I’m single now you see what love did?

He goes even further into his description of feeling like love can be addicting. Using different metaphors to describe how toxic love can be at times, when you experience it for the wrong person. How complicated and confusing love can be for both people in a relationship, and how truly hard it can be for love to work out. Due to all the many different circumstances that can interrupt it.

I rehab from your love but I still do reuse it

Is love one of those things you meant to do while healing

Crafting vivid imagery with just his words. These techniques go perfectly into the song due to how easily and seamlessly he can weave them into his rhyme scheme. Millkzy having a past in spoken word has much more experience with these poetry techniques, and can easily blend them into his music. Using the more simple techniques also goes perfectly with the theme and the melancholy vibe of the song. The rather calm and sleek tone of the music fits perfectly with that type of language.

Sweet Home: Bitter Roots

“Beloved” isn’t just a novel it is an experience that lingers after the last page story wise and reality wise. Toni Morrison wrote an incredible story based on Sethe, a former slave and her daughter Denver. The story speaks on the physical and emotional scars of slavery. The arrival of Beloved, said to be Sethe’s dead daughter, a ghost, and one who experienced being on the boats used for slave trade, unlocks repressed memories and pushes as they are confronted.

The remarkable thing is, this is not just a story this was thousands of enslaved peoples daily lives and it truly puts it into perspective as it is easy to loose grasp of what once was. Although slavery isn’t prominent or as out there as it was the trauma, experience, its effects on this very generation(my generation), racism, colorism, dehumanization, having thought on how race can play an impact in opportunities even when it shouldn’t, still exists today.

In my class when we discussed this book the discussion on Sethe’s mothering was brought up. The question being if her killing her children when the white men came was “insanity” or “love” and what is the extent of each. Now off the bat the question was a bit off but it made me realize there might’ve not been sympathy because she was a mother or she was enslaved. To me it is a no brainer that what she did was motherly instincts of giving the slight chance that your children would experience a brutal and dehumanizing experience such as one has experienced. Therefore Sethe killing her children made sense because she took on her motherly duties. To think on the surface level of what had been done to enslaved people such as spiked collars, iron bits, iron masks, separation of families made to be hard to trace back to one another, breeding, hunted, etc. all these dehumanizing things are done to another human being because of the color of skin. It makes a 100% sense that Sethe as a human being, as a mother, as an enslaved person, would in a heartbeat save her children from such a life.

At the end of the day the only person who can question Sethe is Denver and the only people to fully know are those at Sweet Home and other enslaved people. “Beloved” challenges us to confront the truths of history and to acknowledge that slavery’s shadow still darkens our present.

The Power of Community and How It Split Saeed and Nadia- Exit To The West.

In the book Exit To The West by Moshin Hamid, community is a very important aspect of life. Similarity to real life, being around people who understand you and your views on the world can be an amazing feeling. While one can find community in a person, but having a group of people you can talk to about things is amazing. This is shown throughout the book, through Saeed’s attachment to him and Nadia’s neighbors in Britain, and his connection to the preacher’s daughter.

To begin, One of the book’s big showings of how important community can be is when Nadia and Saeed go through their first door to Britain. When they’re meeting the new people in this foreign place, Nadia has a much easier time adjusting compared to Saeed. Nadia is able to better empathize and talk with the Nigerian people they meet, while Saeed struggles to make friends unfamiliar with their culture. He ends up making friends with their next door neighbors who come from their home country, he becomes confused about how Nadia doesn’t feel a similar way. This all stems from the differences in the communities and environments they were raised in. Nadia being a woman in a community that had a very strict set of rules women had to live by, she struggled to fit in because they refused to understand her. Meanwhile Saeed being a man in this community allowed him to better accept their culture and become more in tune with it compared to Nadia.

Moving forward, A second example the book gives, is when Saeed builds a connection to the preacher’s daughter. The connection they build is based around Saeed’s homeland and where the preacher’s daughter’s mother is from, because the preacher practices the religion from Saeed’s homeland. She understands Saeed’s ties to religion and family and how these two things tie him to a community he has been separated from. Giving him a new family to share these interests with, this is something Nadia can neither do for Saeed nor understand. She knows how important religion is to Saeed and how it connects him to his family, but she cannot understand it on any level past empathy for Saeed, she doesn’t much care for their homeland’s religion. She never bonded with many in that community besides Saeed, and her family was never that close. Their views on the culture of their homeland created a rift in their relationship

The importance of one being able to bond with those around them through means of similar interest,  and gain access to a community that they can converse with is extremely important. Humans are social creatures through nature, and this book helps show it. Once Saeed and Nadia were no longer able to converse, they’re relationship began to slowly dissolve. Even though they still loved each other, they were unable to relate to one another. Opening a door to a new part of their lives, a part where they were not together.

Unspoken Truths for Oneself

In Toni Morrison’s, Beloved, the destruction of self-identity due to slavery and oppression is portrayed throughout the entire book. The formerly enslaved grapple with the uncertainty of belonging in an antebellum America and facing trauma past slavery is a battle they face every single day.

Beloved’s arrival at 124 to me represented the start of Sethe’s journey through self healing. Not only did Sethe hold trauma from being enslaved but she also had to make the choice to kill her baby; Beloved. This choice marked a huge shift in not only her life but baby Suggs as well. Beloved’s haunting presence symbolizes how the past can linger and control the present making it difficult for Sethe to move on. Morrison’s use of a super natural entity such as Beloved is a reminder of the deep scars that are left by slavery. The novel constantly highlights how past trauma can haunt people in clearly visible ways as well as invisible ways. Healing requires facing the past even when it is painful: as we see it drains Sethe mentally and physically as she loses weight. Reclaiming one’s identity after suffering a great tragedy is a process essential for freedom and true independence.

What are the Limits of Maternal Love?

I believe that a mother’s love has no limits. The book Beloved demonstrates it to its extremes, with characters having to choose the fate of their children’s futures. Author Toni Morrison utilizes characters such as Sethe to force readers to question whether her actions were out of reason or madness. The book does this through exploring the perspectives of the community around 124 and allows readers to form their own opinions on the matter.

The community’s most empathetic member, Baby Suggs, falls into a deep depression after Sethe kills her own kids in hopes of preventing them from experiencing the horrors of slavery. She is torn between her emotions for Sethe as a mother, because in truth, what she had done freed her children from lives of endless pain and suffering at the hands of their White counterparts. As a mother herself who has witnessed slavery and its evils, Baby Suggs cannot feel anyway about Sethes choice other than to feel empty about the loss of life.

Later in the novel when Stamp Paid discusses with Paul D the horrors that occurred in the shed that day, he claims it was Sethes best attempt to “out-hurt the hurter,” and as a demonstration of her devote love for her children. Her actions were not out of craze, but instead of a connection so deep for her children that she could never let them live out lives as painful as hers.

In the end, a mothers love cannot be measured by one action alone. The amount of outside stressors in a particular moment cannot singlehandedly detail the extent at which a mother loves. Arguing one way or another that Sethe should or not of killed her children in hopes of protecting them is irrelevant to whether her actions was one without love.

Stability

It’s easy to avoid thinking or speaking on historical topics that are very cruel and violent, in this case slavery and racism leading to systematic and societal setbacks in the book Beloved, and as someone who has never worried about security in terms of a stable house or living situation, I find the characters of this book’s situations very eye-opening and horrible. Part I of the book focuses on 124 as the character’s home, and Baby Suggs tries to make it stable and a place of love, but due to many circumstances, for example and especially Beloved’s ghost, this task is almost impossible. Paul D’s arrival to the story and home seems to temporarily ease the tense and unstable energy of the home, but all in all it seems like as much as the characters try to make a “home”, the past keeps interrupting it. While 124 is Sethe and Denver’s house, they are constantly on edge; Denver feeling trapped and isolated and Sethe feeling constantly reminded of her traumatic past. Especially with Sethe living in multiple places and situations, I’m sure it is hard for her to truly feel like she’s “home” or safe anywhere. I feel like the story is expressing how you can try to build a stable life and home, but your past will always haunt you and hinder your ability to. This house, 124, was a big part of both of the girl’s lives, so it is familiar to them and stable in terms of being a constant location, but that doesn’t make it feel safe or stable overall.

Development through Tough Situations

Hal Hartley, director of 1990’s, Trust, teaches audiences that morals and perspectives shift as you age an experience the world around you. Had it not been for the death of Maria’s father and Matthew being misunderstood in his environment, neither of them would have developed into people who understand their circumstances and are self aware.

Although neither of the characters situations at the end of the film were favorable, they were each liberated from some form of oppression which prevented them from progressing as an individual. Maria, being finally free to do as she pleases, learns to respect herself and to take control of her future. This is symbolized by her placing the glasses on her face in the closing shots of the movie. Whether Maria has a happy ending or not, viewers can only assume.

Our other main character, Matthew is not so lucky although still becoming self aware. He is driven into a silent craze where he arms his grenade in a desperate claw for control of his situation. He is eventually brought in by the cops to where he watches Maria as he is driven off, literally showing his separation from her. Also, this scene symbolizes how Matthew stops resisting the inevitable (punishment for his actions) and how he is accepting of his circumstance.

The Hypocrisy of The Stranger

The Stranger is an amazing book giving an amazing insight into the hypocrisy of man. Wanting to be understood yet refusing to understand others around us. Meursault cannot comprehend why others don’t understand his dissociation with reality and indifference to life, yet he also can’t understand why others hold such importance in life. This causes him to be some form of a hypocrite, judging people for not understanding him while simultaneously not understanding their perspective nor emotions.

Meursault goes around not caring about others nor himself, he doesn’t much care for politics, or has many hobbies of his own. He has no real connections to reality, even his own mother did not hold much weight in his life. While it is apparent he loved his mother, their relationship was not as important to him as others’relationship to their mother. He doesn’t understand his friends, nor even Marie for that matter. He doesn’t understand why they want to be around him in any sense or form, let alone one on a personal level. Because he cannot understand it on an emotional level, he attempts to break it down with logical thinking.

He is unable to see how life matters, the story can be interpreted as him beginning to understand. Him beginning to see the joy in life, the same way everyone else does. He gets glimpses of the beauty of life when he’s alone with Marie, those moments where we see Meursault be truly happy. Though they are fleeting and not permanent, the first time he truly understands the joy life can bring is through his death. He finally comes to peace with himself and the world around him, and the life he lived. Understanding how indifferent the world is, and how while in a logical sense nothing truly matters. It is because of that fact that you are supposed to live life to its fullest, as who can really judge you when nothing matters.

 

The Sun-Blinding Truth: A Study of Camus’ Stranger

What’s so beautiful about The Stranger  is how it highlights societal treatment of those who are “out of the ordinary.” When introduced to the main character Meursault, the absolute first page talks about his lack of emotion towards his mothers death. It seems like a disturbance in his everyday routine of life besides what normally the actual person would be the disturbance. We are prompted to have a distaste in his representation in the book but in reality he is an ordinary guy. We all have different ways of dealing with things and like Meursault, I believe be bottles it up. His cool way viewing life can be mostly irritating to people as whenever someone keeps to themselves society shakes a little in its boots. His bottled up emotions “triggered by his environment” is what causes him to end up shooting an Arab and landing him in jail.

Meursault throughout his story meets numerous people and experiences numerous things. His reactions are to get irritated/annoyed or want to leave immediately. So I get the feeling of being automatically nudged to judge him as if we’re so much better. This reminds me of the short story Escape from Spiderhead by George Saunders. The characters were known to be killers and them going through experiments was kind of their way out. In there they are treated as less than human which justifies the more inhumane things that happened to them. We know throughout the story that the man (Abnesti) and the corporation that were supposed to be doing the good were actively doing bad. We even know in one scene Abnesti freaking out saying they are the monsters yet he allowed for people to die in his hands(his hands as he is the one with the “power”), control them (giving drugs for submission and pain) while having no empathy what so ever. Which brings to question, isn’t one of humans greatest gift to feel empathy, yet why are the ones labeled less than human the ones feeling the most empathetic. Sometimes that’s what society fails at, pushing our conditioned beliefs onto people and not helping people with no sense of judgement.

Final statement:

I love when writers allow the character to take control of their final moments. They don’t conform, or over step, their endings always end according to their own being.

Fragile Normalcy

Bomb shells, artillery bullets, and gangs of revolutionaries posted up in the streets. This is the world Mohsin Hamid places us in within Exit West. We meet Nadia, who lives alone and independently, and Saeed, who still lives with his family in the heart of a city slowly unraveling.

The unpredictability of their surroundings extend to everyday objects, like windows, transforming from harmless features into potential dangers. For example, “One’s relationship with windows now changes in the city” (71). What was once a source of light and openness becomes a reminder of vulnerability. Through these moments, Hamid illustrates how war seeps into every corner of life, altering what people fear, how they live, and what they take for granted, showing that in war, safety and danger can trade places in an instant.

What begins as an ordinary life is quickly overtaken by the chaos of conflict, showing how unpredictable and fragile normalcy becomes in war. Hamid captures this sudden shift through the loss of Saeed’s mother, who is killed by a stray bullet while simply checking her car for a lost earring: “a stray heavy-caliber round passing through the windshield of her family’s car and taking with it a quarter of Saeed’s mother’s head” (74–75). The randomness of her death highlights how war does not discriminate. Tragedy can strike in the most unexpected moments. One moment she is safe. Next, she is gone. It also dives in to how fragile life is. War is so unpredictable it tends to his people when they least expect it. Interestingly, Saeed’s late night trips to Nadia’s put him in more danger, however, his mothers simple task resulted in her losing her life.

Whats even more saddening is how a window was the facilitator of Saeed’s mothers death. While the windshield let light in, they also represent weakness and openings for tragedy to strike. Wars result it is often out of ones hands whether they live or die and It will always be unpredictable.`

Mind-Boggled By Semplica Girls

I closed “The Semplica-Girl Diaries” and was met with more questions than answers, but that was the point.

The genius of this George Saunders short story, and all of his others, is that it transports the reader into a reality in which the mind of the reader can seamlessly believe based on the values pre-set for them by society. You read about a low income household with a dad who tries with all his might to make his children proud and happy – yeah, that’s what a dad should be doing. You read about a prisoner who is sentenced to being a subject in scientific trials as his punishment – yeah, criminals deserve retribution (“Escape From Spiderhead”). But then you are presented with the true, and often unsettling realities of those scenarios without having ever expected it. 

Saunders’ stories delve into the flawed and twisted morals that have been normalized into nonissues by throwing questions at the reader, forcing them to reflect on why they believe the things, or behave the way they do. 

Semplica Girls made me dig beneath the layers of my understanding of humanity. Take for instance lawn decorations, in this story presented as immigrant women getting paid to be strung up by their heads to beautify the homes of upper-middle class citizens. Gnomes, in our world, are common lawn decorations. Why gnomes? Aren’t they creepy little men with pointy hats and big red cheeks; who wants to have that greeting anyone who happens to walk by their house? Sure, those ornaments aren’t causing anyone physical and emotional harm like the ‘lawn decorations’ introduced to us in the short story, but still – why gnomes? The utter strangeness of everyday objects can be seen through a whole new set of eyes when presented with a completely unfathomable and made-up example of something perceived in an imagined world to have the same level of significance. It made me deeply reconsider the origins of our traditions, things, and values.

But I realized the message could go even deeper than that. The polarization and lack of nuance and discussion that is currently driving our country’s political and social spheres isn’t something that just happened to have spawned overnight – the United States political system as we know it today only exists as it does due to exploitation, racism, and greed. Those have been the major driving factors that have influenced an immeasurable amount of United States, not to mention global, history, and therefore current society.

I needed to take a second and fully come to terms with that, because how often do we observe the systems and foundations that we operate by while acknowledging all of the violence and injustices that have been committed as things to be taken for granted? I let myself bask in that overwhelming feeling because I believed it would allow me to form a more intense connection to my sense of humanity. I’m still coming to terms with this Saunders tale; my thoughts on it are frequently convoluted, yet I take my time processing and further analyzing the structures I encounter on a daily basis. Structures that could, in a far-off universe, appear entirely bizarre and inhumane. This frame of perception shapes how I interact with people, and it gives me the critical thinking I need in order to navigate the tumultuous and complex world I live in.



A Conversation About Bread – Human Bias

It is in human nature to have bias. Whether it is bias based in nostalgia, or misinformation, or even the environment one grew up in. Humans will always have some form of bias for one thing or another. A Conversation About Bread is a short story from the book “Heads of the Colored People”, made by renowned author Nafissa Thompson Spires. This book does an amazing job showcasing how one’s perspective can create a unconscious bias. In this short story our main characters Brian and Eldwin are discussing their project for college, where they have to discuss one thing the other had went through and write about it. Each giving their unique perspective on the one’s experience. Eldwin chooses to talk about one of Brian’s experiences, a conversation he had with an old friend in school who used to bring fancy breads. Eldwin wishes to turn this into a conversation about how black people are not all the same, about how there are vast differences between them.

 

This short story does a great job of showcasing how one’s perspective and understanding on life, can cause them to have a bias. Eldwin believes that he is more “black” than Brian even though Brian grew up around more black people, this is because to a certain degree Eldwin believes he is more educated than Brian. Due to his upbringing and where he lived, he believes he is better than Brian. This is shown when Brian attempts to explain to him why his script falls short, he tries to reason with Brian and explains what he wishes for the script to be instead of looking at what it is.

Without even knowing, when Eldwin actually begins writing the script  for the project his own bias twists the story in a way he doesn’t want. Eldwin’s perspective is different than Brian’s, Eldwin grew up in a rather well off area and is much more ignorant on the topic of black culture than he believes himself to be. Because of this when writing the story, Brian tells him the way he’s writing it all the other characters seem like a stereotype while Junior(the one with the fancy bread) seems like he’s just above being black in general. Eldwin’s natural bias due to his perspective and his environment makes him have trouble seeing why his story isn’t coming out the way it is supposed to.

 

It isn’t until the end of the story after Brian explains the issue, and Eldwin revises his script two more times he finally realizes his bias. He simply does not understand the perspective needed for this type of story as it is not his, because of this his natural ideologies and bias sneaks into the story. When Brian returns from his book haul, Eldwin tells Brian “Look, maybe you should tell this story,” Giving Brian a chance to show him his perspective and help relinquish Eldwin’s biases.

Crying vs Caring

When I first started reading The Stranger by Albert Camus my initial reaction to Mersault’s lack of grieving over his mothers death was to judge him and his character. “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (3). He didn’t cry, didn’t talk much about her or her life, not even in his own head, and he even seemed detached at her funeral and was more focused on other factors like the heat and time: “The sun was beginning to bear down on the earth and it was getting hotter by the minute. I don’t know why we waited so long before getting under way” (15) and like he didn’t care at all, not through what he was letting others see of him and not even in his own head.

But when later thinking about what I had read, I realized I can heavily relate to Mersault and that I was being very hypocritical. When my own grandfather and great-aunt passed away, I found myself not being able to cry both when hearing and processing the news and at both of their funerals. I even tried to force myself to cry as I thought that was the societal, right-thing to do, and I really did feel horrible and I felt like crying, but I just couldn’t. From what others could see of me, they probably viewed me similar to how they would view Mersault if they read the book, careless and almost selfish, but, at least speaking for myself, there is more to a persons grief and emotions than just what is visible. From where I am right now in the book, just after the third chapter, I can’t say for sure if Mersault does care at all about his mothers death, but I also can’t say that he does not, although he does say and think some things that I wouldn’t have, like: “It didn’t mean anything” (3), but I still believe that I judged him too soon initially. He seems very distracted and sort of in denial about the whole situation, and I think maybe he doesn’t want to process or let himself grieve her death. Everybody grieves differently, and just because someone doesn’t appear to be struggling it doesn’t mean that they aren’t. I’ll keep this in mind when reading this book and others, as well as in real life situations.

The Old Blogs are Dead! Long Live the Old Blogs!

At present, we use the Edublogs platform for our class blog, which is built on a WordPress platform — one of the most popular and robust web publishing platforms in the world. We had been using the WordPress.com platform directly for several years, and you can still wander around that old AP Lit blog.

For many years before that, we used the Blogger platform for the AP Lit blog, but it was a very limited and bug-ridden platform, and Google eventually stopped supporting it.

If you are interested, though, in seeing what those long-ago AP Lit students have been thinking and writing about, feel free to wander over to the old old AP Lit blog.

old blog

Lessons from the Literature of AP Lit

Before I started high school, I was always reading. I would read whenever I could get the chance and as soon as I finished a book, I would start a new one. Once I started high school, I was busier, and I read less and less. The books we have read this year have reignited my love for reading and I am so grateful for the class. The books that impacted me the most during the year were Pride and Prejudice and Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead. These books have all taught me important lessons about myself and life.

I had already read Pride and Prejudice before reading it in class and I loved it when I initially read it. Reading it again and being able to analyze it on a deeper level was an impactful experience. Not only did it transport me to a different world, it also reminded me to follow your heart. When Lady Catherine was questioning Elizabeth and insinuating that she and her family were not good enough, Elizabeth held her ground and stayed calm. When Lady Catherine questioned why her family did not have a governess, Elizabeth stated that her mother was perfectly capable of taking care of all of them. Additionally, Elizabeth defied societal standards twice when she refused to marry Mr. Collins and again when she refused to marry Mr. Darcy. Both marriages would have given her and her family financial stability but they were not going to make her happy. She put her happiness and her values before other’s expectations of her. This is something that I think is important for me to remember because it can be hard to say no to others but Pride and Prejudice has served as a reminder that it is always important to value my happiness and uphold my values.

Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead was another impactful book that we read during the year. Janina stood strongly for her beliefs and did what she could to make a difference. She was perceived by others as weird and crazy but she kept fighting for humane treatment of animals and an end to poaching. Even when she was dismissed by men in power because they thought she was just a crazy old woman, she continued to fight for her beliefs. She showed that having any type of impact is important and that it does not matter what others think of you. At times, it is hard for me to believe that my actions will have any real impact but her determination to make a change, even if it only affected her small village, showed me that even small change is good change.

Overall, the books we have read for AP Lit have been entertaining and kept me reading throughout the school year. If I hadn’t taken the class, I most likely would have made excuses that I was too busy to read, and I would have read a lot less. Therefore, I am truly grateful for the class and the lessons I have learned because of it.

How Literature Changed Me

In my English class this year, we read many books. Some revolved around identity and romanticism while others focused on change and the past. However, the most important, yet interesting book to me was Shakespeare’s King Lear. King Lear focuses on the downfall of a central character, then after a character transformation, a complete change in values to a more purposeful life. King Lear was the central character who focused on his riches, domination, but, most importantly, power over others. Before his character growth, Lear spent little time with those around him and struggled to formulate real connections with those around him, including his own daughters. While I am certainly very different from King Lear, I do notice a few similarities between our values and actions. 

While I did not banish a loved one because they did not display their love for me, I frequently sacrificed spending time with my friends and family as throughout high school the majority of my time was spent maintaining my academic rigor and grades. It could be said that I valued my studies over my connections with others which is similar to Lear’s value of power to his connection with others. While reading King Lear and working in class discussions, I was amazed by the different ways in which Lear changed. Admitting he is mad, weeping and apologizing to his third daughter, to dying of a broken heart, King Lear completely shifted his values from his power to his family which similarly inspired me and my values.

Although I can not take back what I used to value and the choices I made, I have realized that I should prioritize the connections in my life more than anything else. As shown by King Lear, despite him losing both his powers and his daughter, it was his daughter’s death that caused him the most pain. Having to go to college next fall, I unfortunately will fall out of contact with a lot of my current friends. However in a new space, I look forward to putting myself out there and making connections with people in any way possible whether it be at a library, student club, or sports event. At college, I look forward to meeting new people everyday and studying on the side. Although I may not have changed as much as King Lear, literature has forced me to open my eyes to subtle changes I can make to my daily lifestyle. While many of the novels we read this year did have deep meanings and depicted important aspects of life, King Lear was the strongest example of how I have been impacted by this class. 

The Defense of Comedy as an Art Form: Young Sheldon

Aristotle defines a comedy as a story in which a sympathetic character has a rise in fortune. I think that this is an incredibly important art form because it allows us to learn more about the world as a whole while enjoying ourselves. When people go looking for entertainment, they want to watch something that takes them away from the real world because the real world is exhausting. Comedy provides this escape for those who are watching but it is not a complete waste of time as we are still learning something.

I recently watched Young Sheldon and upon being asked to defend comedy as an art form, I knew that I would use this show.

Young Sheldon walks the audience through the life of a child genius and his average family. The audience learns about the benefits of Sheldon as well as the challenges that come with having a unique child. In every episode, you are sure to laugh many times but a lesson is always learned by the end whether that be listening to those around you or being patient with the world and not consistently rushing to get things done.

Alongside the little lessons that are learned on an episode to episode basis, there are larger lessons that can be learned throughout the entire show. I think that the most important lesson that can be learned is that no matter what happens, life will go on and there will be people to help pick you up along the way.

As a whole, every night when I came home from a long day of school and activities, I looked forward to watching an episode of Young Sheldon so that I could have a break in the day but it was not only a break. Every time that I turned on an episode, I was learning a lesson about the world around me and the people in it.

Aging and its effects on the psyche represented in King Lear

Throughout reading and watching King Lear being performed, I was impressed by the actor’s ability to represent Lear’s aging and how, by the end of the play, he finally realized who he should have been all along: a father to his daughters.

Throughout the play, I expected Lear to go mad and become even more “evil” than he was at the beginning toward everyone else, but I was happily surprised to see the opposite happen. This development in his psyche and his becoming mad paved the way for him to come back and develop a new sense of his reality, and his situation as the king.

These ideas I think are best portrayed in the version in which Ian Mckellan takes on the role of lear.  This adaptation I feel is the best 1 to 1 “replica” of the play. But is nowhere near the beauty and almost perfection of Akira Kurosawa’s “Ran”. This version symbolizes aging especially with Lear in which he becomes weaker, but also kinder. Realizing that his power was nothing compared to his relationship with his daughters. Which he finally realized was more important.

One passage that really connected to me was the soliloquy spoken by Lear during the storm. This passage I feel really demonstrated his transition in mentalities more than any other scene in the story. The moments of realization for him as the entire scene unfolds in the castle just scenes before allowing him to turn into a loving father at the end of the play. This was a crucial moment in the play, and if it had not happened I am not sure the play would have worked its way out in the same way, or even been half as impactful as it was by the end.

Overall, I feel my favorite character has to be Kent. Not only because I played him in act one, but also because he demonstrates strength and undying loyalty. He could have easily turned against Lear when he was wrongfully banished, or taken sides with the daughters. But he did not, he stood by him even in a dirty disguise and gave him everything he needed to reunite with Cordelia and finish off the plot and tragedy of the play.

Lear + Cordelia duo

There are many duos in the play King Lear: the sisters Regan and Goneril, the brothers Edmund and Edgar, the father-son duo of Edgar and Gloucester, and many more. My favorite duo, however, is that of Lear and Cordelia, especially because of the progression and redemption of the relationship by the end of the play. At the beginning, Lear and Cordelia start out very loving each other: they walk in together during the second scene where Lear splits the land and where Lear had planned to give the best portion of land to Cordelia. However, Cordelia states the truth when Lear plays his game of “who loves him most.” She states that she loves him only according to her status as a daughter and that her sisters are lying about their love for him. Lear then gets angry: Cordelia was his favorite child, but after this perceived betrayal, Lear disowns her.

The reason that this relationship is my favorite is because of its redemption. Lear, as he progresses through his character arc, seems to become more humane, humble, and caring. He begins to realize, especially after the actual betrayals of his daughters Goneril and Regan, that Cordelia is the only daughter that truly loves him. That, in my opinion, is redemption of their relationship. I think it’s poetic that at the end of the play (spoilers), they meet again, Cordelia never doubting her love for her father, and her father finding his love for his daughter again, and that during the very last scene, they die together (at least in space, even though not in time). It made for a less tragic tragedy…sort of a triumph, now that I think about it, a redemption of their relationship.

“Poetry” analysis of Chopin’s (wordless) Nocturne Op. 27 No. 2

I don’t really listen to music with lyrics. Thankfully, my teacher said that I could pick a piece without lyrics as long as I was willing to defend it as poetry. My piece is titled “Nocturne,” Opus 27 No. 2. It is by Frédéric Chopin. This piece is part of Chopin’s nocturnes, some of which are famous (such as Op. 9 no. 2).

Now we get into the meat of the argument. So, how is a piece without words…poetic? Let’s consider aspects of Perrine’s definition of poetry. Perrine’s chief point is that poetry conveys experience. This nocturne does that. Consider the very meaning of the word nocturne: night. Every nocturne is a representation of a night, whether that be calm, windy, stormy, or frightful–usually, it’s calm and melancholy, as it is in this case. But really, a nocturne (and any piece of music) invites the listener to steep their own experiences in the music, enriching and deepening their experience of that experience, if you will. To illustrate this point, please consider this example:

An elderly man, a widower, sits alone on a park bench in a city park at night. A streetlight stands patiently above him, illuminating the bench. He sees the bustling of the city outside the park’s premises: the tall buildings, the scurrying traffic. The night is cool and breezy. Leaves tumble about close to the ground; trees above him sway gently. He is listening to this Chopin nocturne. As the piece begins, he reminisces about the times that he shared with his wife. Perhaps he recalls the feel that he had forgotten of her head cradled in the nook of his shoulder, his head on top of hers, watching old movies together. Or perhaps he remembers the tenderness of her smile on a light stroll through this very park in a golden afternoon.

Instead of words, Chopin uses aria-like melodies–that is, a solo for a soprano voice but for the piano–over a sweeping arpeggiated accompaniment. Without getting into specific music theory, Chopin’s deliberate moments of tension and release of the harmony–for example, the high note at 0:19 in this recording (the same one as above)–create a duality between calm and bitterness, creating melancholy. The piece evokes the experiences of the audience–in this case, the widower’s memories of his wife–aiding the audience in immersing themselves in and deepening their memory of their experiences.

Another specific part of Perrine’s definition of poetry that applies to this piece (and to virtually all instrumental music) is a communication between the speaker and the audience–to put it into musical terms, the performer and the audience. If you ever go to a live concert, whatever the genre, you’ll feel the energy in the space–but allow me to specifically cover classical music. Every performer and even every performance is different. As a music performer myself, there is a certain energy and emotion that a performer must give the music in order to create this poetic, emotional effect. Just as there is a world of difference between having a computer-generated voice and a professional voice actor read a poem, there is a world of difference between a person who plays robotically and a person who plays with emotion and from the heart. You can see that emotion on the performer’s–Maria João Pires’–face, especially in the beginning. This emotional communication, if you will, from the performer to the audience, is specifically what enables that emotional response within the audience. Just as in poetry, it is a communication between the speaker and the audience. That emotional response deepens whatever experience that the piece evokes in the audience: a loved one, better times in the past, hope for the future, the joy and pain of being alive, night, really anything that comes to mind.

The final aspect of Perrine’s definition that I would like to write about here is poetry’s nature of being condensed & concentrated, containing a higher “voltage” per word, as Perrine states. I’d argue that it’s similar for instrumental music. The piece is only 6 minutes long, and there are plenty of other emotion-provoking pieces out there with even shorter runtimes–3 minutes, 1 minute even. In this short runtime, the piece takes the listener on a journey–no, an adventure. It begins with a calm, bittersweet melody and texture. The nocturne is calm, and the night it represents is calm. Elements of tension begin brewing at 0:54; they bubble at 1:00 and boil at 1:07. The night is biting. But at 1:26, the night backs away. The tension releases, but not all the way. It begins to boil again. From then until 2:00, there is a mini-journey: tension rises and relaxes, and the listener doesn’t know where the piece will go. It boils, dissipates; boils, dissipates. Then, at 2:00, there is release. The main theme returns, and the night is calm again. In the span of just two minutes, Chopin and Pires have taken us on a journey of tension and release through this night, and the piece isn’t even halfway over yet. That’s high voltage. Chopin uses this journey to convey an experience of night–a specific kind of night, calm yet bitter–and perhaps deepen an experience that the audience has had themselves, as in the example with the widower.

I think that this piece, Chopin’s Nocturne Opus 27 No. 2, despite containing no words, is musical poetry.

What Is Being Taken Away From This Book?

Once I had finished reading Beloved by Toni Morrison, my initial inclination was to research and write a blog post about maternal filicide, or child murder by the mother. For me, that was one of the areas of the book that I immediately felt strongly about and took to discussing with the people around me, even if they had not read the story yet.

Reading about Sethe believing she had no other choice, taking her drastic measures, and ultimately saving her family from returning to slavery the point in the book where I started to feel in awe about the complexities the characters within the novel had.

Now that it has been a few days since I am done reading the book, however, I am not quite sure what someone who reads the book on their own, without the input of an English class and teacher to guide their evaluation of the work, will end up taking away from this highly complex piece of literature. Because it is so complex, because it has so many layers that incorporate elements of very enticing fiction, I wonder if some of the sub messages are not as easily accessible to the casual reader picking it up for the first time.

Ultimately, I believe that any reader will take away from the novel the same level of new thought as the amount of interest and focus they put into it. Morrison has a way with weaving this story that can be accepted more at face value or explored deeper, but I do still think that some of the harsher, more horrible things, that happened towards the beginning of the book and in flashbacks, might be easily overlooked when remembering the book.

They were shocking to read in the moment, yes, but in discussion and later evaluation, I wonder if those atrocities are viewed as less important than the rest of the story in the same way we (as a society) sometimes focus less on those more difficult moments when having discussions about history.

Why don’t we talk about sex from the female perspective?

In my AP Lit class, we have been asked to discuss the sexual encounters in Beloved. We talk about all of the different events that have occurred, but I fear that we are missing one of Morrison’s key points.

Throughout the novel so far, from the sweet home men and the cows all the way to when Paul D temporarily lost attraction to Sethe after sleeping with her for the first time, each sexual encounter places a focus on the male desire (with the exception of Sethe and Halle in the corn field, however, I would argue that that does not place the focus on desire but on the feelings of freedom and the protection that the other sweet home men provided them). The female desire is not taken into account until Beloved goes to find Paul D in the shed.

In the book, Beloved is originally portrayed as a creepy and almost antagonistic character and later in the novel we find out that not only is she a strange person but she also happens to be the ghost that has been wreaking chaos in 124.

I have no idea why Morrison made this choice in the novel. I do not know if this is a continuation of the story of 1873 or if it is a commentary of how sex is perceived in modern day society but I know that Morrison made a conscious choice in giving the female perspective of sex almost solely to the only antagonistic, creepy, and destructive woman in the novel.

The Doors: Were They the Right Move?

When we first began reading Exit West by Mohsin Hamid in class, I was confused why Hamid decided to include magical doors that could lead an individual to a different country in his novel. I thought the presence of the doors took away from the seriousness or reality of the piece. Without the portals, the story could have been seen as more realistic, and readers would be more likely to see the real-world  implications.

One day in class, though, about when we were halfway through the book, Mr. Heidkamp had us listen to Hamid’s explanation for why he included the doors. He explained how by having Nadia and Saeed, and all migrants in the book, find doors to walk through instead of journeying to their new destination, it forces the audience to focus only on the stories and lives of the migrants before and after the migration. If Hamid were to include the long and treacherous journey of migrating to a new country or even continent, half the book – or at least a short, action-packed section of the book – would have to document the journey, and readers would only sympathize with or perceive the characters through the lens of their journey.

I know many others shared the opinion I had when I first started reading this book: they feel that the doors make the story seem too magical or too unrealistic. But, I hope those people take the time to truly listen to what Hamid has to say about the portals. His explanation made me realize the true perspective of a migrant, and how the media on migrants today take away from the real stories and voices of millions. The media crafts a perspective of only just the journey of migration, stating things like “Boats of Hundreds Docks in Italy from Africa.” Instead, Exit West forces the audience to perceive Nadia and Saeed’s life, not journey.

My review of Exit West.

It’s not good.

Ok, let me clarify. The first half is good – beyond good, in fact. It’s provocative, interesting; it’s that kind of writing that wraps you up in the story and doesn’t let go – in a good way, of course.

Then the stinking doors appear. When mentions of the doors started popping up, I interpreted the doors as a metaphor for actual methods of refugee transport: boats, planes, land vehicles, whatnot. I interpreted “doors” as metaphorical doors, as in the phrase “open new doors to opportunities,” as in possibilities, not actual doors.

But no, the author meant literal doors. I thought the idea was not good. Honestly, Hamid should have 1) just created a story based solely on the idea of teleporting doors, Monsters Inc. style. That would have been a better book. Or 2) just get rid of the doors from this book. Then this book would have been better. Focusing on the harrowing journey of refugees is a gold mine of empathy generation, if executed well. But no, the author decided to keep both ideas, like an amateur LEGO builder throwing every colored brick onto the house, or a music composer throwing every single idea that pops into their head onto a piece. Alright, I’m being harsh, but it’s just too much.

And it doesn’t get better after the whole door shenanigans. I’m venturing into spoiler territory here. In my opinion, the plot in the second half of the book (after the couple steps through their first door) falls off the rails. Whereas the first half was provocative and empathy-generating, the second half is filled with direct moral preaching – much less effective, in my opinion. For example, Hamid tries to evoke the “we are all immigrants” argument in one of his loosely-connected tangents that go nowhere (I wish he would have explored those more, connected them to the main story of the book), where he recalls the story of a person who sees their neighborhood change through time, stating that “we are all migrants through time.” Additionally, Hamid argues against nativism through his portrayal of nativists as bigoted and evil. In doing so, however, he makes them one-dimensional and without personality, alienating the very audience to which he is writing. Let me clarify that audience: Hamid is not writing for people who already empathize completely and support refugees completely, neither is he writing for extreme nativists who will not tolerate even a single foreigner into their country. Rather, he is writing for people “on the fence” in those richer countries who are keen on learning more about refugees and are open to empathizing – perhaps even want to empathize – with those refugees, yet they still love their country and want to protect it from the turbulence and possible dangers that assimilating new peoples into their country will bring. While some may argue that this book is not about preaching politics but rather following the story of Nadia and Saeed, to that I say that I did not get that impression. Rather, I felt that the couple was more a vehicle for Saeed’s moral message. I did not create much of an emotional bond with the characters, nor see their characters develop throughout the book; I didn’t grow to love them – defeating the whole purpose of generating empathy. Not only that, but the author used one-time side characters to put forth his moral and political arguments instead of intertwining them into the couple’s storyline – like the person whose neighborhood moves through time.

Nevertheless, I thought that the first half was strong in generating empathy for refugees; the second half went down the toilet. I could talk for a long time about the flaws and the strengths of this book, but I’ll end it here. I did like the ending though.

Does Football Make You Cross Dimensions

In Game Changers by Neal Shusterman, the main character actually changes dimensions via being tackled. No not CTE or multiple concussions, although around 1.2 million people get seriously harmed from football.

Ash our main character is a 17 ,on the football team Like failing math tests and girl troubles. One day he gets tackled which when you play a contact sport is not surprising, then he notices little details that seem to have changed but no one else believes him. The other team mascot was the wildcat but now the Ravens, he initially rushes it off because believing he’s in another universe seems very far-fetched. Next, the stop sign as we know and love became blue, this was a bit harder to wrap his brain around.

Each time he gets hit something grander changes he’s suddenly rich with a nice car and a fancy house.  These changes don’t only affect him, things in history have also been changed, in one dimension Brown versus the Board of Education  was never one, segregation still existed and his best friend didn’t go to school anymore. There were other more unusual Dimensions like changing his sexuality and giving him a boyfriend.

The final change was him becoming a woman, so he could understand how it feels to be a minority and the social structures.  The book was very addicting. I read it all in one sitting under 3 hours. The writing is not super complex in understanding the text, however it does have broader Messages such as hierarchy in class, gender ,and sexuality.

 

A Response to Benjamin’s Subjectivity and Power

Benjamin responds to Freud’s argument about subjectivity and power in multiple ways. First, she argues that the Freudian model of individuality, which uses binary oppositions to define things, creates generalizations and hierarchies which are dangerous to our society. Next, Benjamin claims that Freud’s idea of individuality, which stems from a strict father figure, is untrue. She argues that children with only maternal relationships are not susceptible to a lack of individuality. Benjamin also argues that individuality is a lonely and dangerous place to be if not in tandem with recognition. Recognition, as Benjamin defines it, is the ability to be recognized by somebody, while also recognizing someone. Keeping a firm balance between recognition and individuality is essential to help us love, understand, and appreciate others while having the mental capacity to be unique and different. 

The most impactful part of Benjamin’s response to me was her description of Freud’s argument. The mindset of binary oppositions and paternal supremacy opened my eyes to how people used to view life and gender roles in the past. This idea helped me comprehend why decisions which we now view as sexist, racist, uncaring, etc… in our history were made. Although I don’t agree with Freudian ideals, it makes sense that people would act based on these morals because they were common belief at the time. Essentially, I’m saying that many historical events and occurrences we see today as ruthless and criminal were not viewed as such during the time. For example, the interaction of a husband punishing his spouse by using physical force seems heartless to us. However, to people in the (not so distant) past, men were justified in doing such. This realization has not only made me cognizant of how moral norms affect lifestyle choices in communities, but also makes me wonder if anything we do in our modern society that we think is “fair” or “normal” will be seen as cruel or unusual in the future.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén