Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: Memory/Past/History

Silence the Music

Watching Raise the Red Lantern, one thing that really stood out to me was how important sound is in a place that is supposed to keep women quiet. Meishan’s voice is powerful and confident because she used to be an opera singer. When she sings, it almost feels like she is refusing to lose completely who she is and was before becoming a concubine. In a house where wives are expected to compete for their master’s attention and follow strict tradition, her singing feels bold and often rebellious at times despite the appreciation master has for it. It is almost as if she is reminding everyone, especially the mistresses, that she is more than just a wife.

Songlian’s flute connects to this idea but in a more subtle way. Unlike Meishan, Songlian doesn’t express herself loudly or confidently. Her flute feels more like a personal keepsake that helps her escape the pressures of living within the compound. It serves as one of the only things she has that still connects her not to the outside world only, but her late father as well. Similar to the way her university uniform connects her to her former life.

To me, the contrast between Meishan’s voice and Songlian’s flute shows two different ways people try to hold on to their identity in a place that wants to redefine you. One is loud and bold, the other is quiet and private. But the sad part of the film is that the system in the house is that it doesn’t really allow them to be free in any way. Whether its a strong voice or a soft flute, any form of individuality eventually gets crushed by the deeply rooted traditions of the household.

More Than a Horse Laugh: How BoJack Horseman Uses Satire to Cut Deep.

BoJack Horseman at first glance seems like another animated comedy with talking animals but beneath the surface is a satire of contemporary culture. It uses humor to get into complex issues challenging viewers to confront uncomfortable truths. The show “light” or thing it does well is its ability to blend silly jokes with deep thoughts about the human condition, making it far more than just a simple cartoon.

The show successfully equips several satirical techniques. Irony is a repetitive one, such as BoJack Horseman, a sitcom star, dealing with depression. There is also the Juxtaposition of bright animation with dark story lines which adds on to the irony.  For example, the episode where BoJack Horseman delivers a eulogy at his mother’s funeral, is filled with dark ironic humor, as he struggles to connect with her even in death. Episode called “free churro.”

Hyperbole exaggerates Hollywood’s celebrity self absorption. Princess Carolyn’s nonstop drive and chaotic work life are hyperbolized to show the entertainment industry’s craziness. The show also uses understatement to highlight the disconnect between outward appearances and inner issues. BoJack Horseman often deflects serious issues with changing remarks, masking his deep pain. This is evident in his relationships, where he downplays his destructive behavior creating a sense of dark humor that underscores his emotional struggles.

BoJack Horseman’s satire goes beyond Hollywood, addressing societal issues. The show portrays mental illness, with BoJack Horseman dealing with depression a ND addiction with honesty. As well as how BoJack Horseman struggles are often dismissed and misunderstood. It also talks about past trauma which has shaped how the characters are now(Sarah Lynn). I find it so interesting how this show reflects how life is right now in the state of the world right now. The entertainment industry is depicted perfectly in this, especially how much people get exploited specifically at a young age.

The show suggests that change starts with acknowledging the social problems and committing to doing better striving for a more compassionate and understanding world.

Seeing Both Sides

Both Sides Now” was first released on Joni Mitchell’s album Clouds (1969) and later rerecorded on her album Both Sides Now (2000). The versions contain the same lyrics with different instrumentation. In both, the melancholy and introspective tone of the music reflects the thoughtfulness of the lyrics. The title of the song alludes to the central themes of experience and perspective throughout the lyrics. Mitchell structure the song in three parts with a chorus (analyzed last) in between each: clouds, love, and life.

Her first reflection is on clouds:

Rows and flows of angel hair
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I’ve looked at clouds that way

Mitchell is reflecting on the way she used to view clouds as beautiful and magical. She uses figurative language in order to translate her romanticized experiences of watching clouds. Also, she uses the cliche of “castles in the air” to highlight the magical and positive view of clouds. Then, Mitchell portrays how her perspective has changed:

But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way

Where she used to see romantic limitlessness of clouds, Mitchell now sees clouds’ ability to block things. In the last two lines, she cites clouds as an obstacle.

Next, Mitchell shifts to love:

Moons and Junes and Ferris wheels
The dizzy dancing way you feel
As every fairy tale comes real
I’ve looked at love that way

She portrays love through moments of happiness, reflecting the idea of romanticized fairy tale love. With time, her perspective has changed:

But now it’s just another show
You leave ’em laughing when you go
And if you care, don’t let them know
Don’t give yourself away

The fairy tale has been shattered. She uses “show” and “leave them laughing” to show how love is performative. Telling someone how you feel will only result in your own pain, Mitchell warns, urging us to not give all our love.

From her new view of love, Mitchell sees both sides of life:

Tears and fears and feeling proud
To say “I love you” right out loud
Dreams and schemes and circus crowds
I’ve looked at life that way

Before, she defined life by love and dreams. Emotions (sadness, fear, pride) in life came from expressing and declaring the idealistic version of love. Aspirations and plans were supposed to be the guide to her life. Here, Mitchell uses diction to call back to previous ideas. “Schemes” has a cynical connotation which hints at the covert motivations people have. Also, she calls back to the idea of performative love by using “circus crowds” to represent the “audience” we perform for.

She describes the other side of life:

But now old friends are acting strange
They shake their heads, they say I’ve changed

Well, something’s lost, but something’s gained
In living every day

Finally, Mitchell brings all of her new perspectives together. As her outlook has changed, so have her relationships. Her repetition of “they” highlights how this change in perspective has distanced her from her past. She concludes by explaining how truly living comes with losses; however, from those losses, we find something new, making life a dynamic give-and-take.

The chorus between each verse follows the same structure while describing clouds, love, and life:

I’ve looked at ____ from both sides now
(Reference to word)
It’s ___ illusions I recall

I really don’t know ___ at all

These choruses holds the central idea of the song. She chooses the word recall to highlight that what she remembers is the illusions, not reality. In this way, she emphasizes how we experience and remember life by romanticizing. At the same time, as she sees both sides, Mitchell recognizes the realities of the things we romanticize. In this way, she develops the central ideas of the song: naivety and lived experience. Although she recognizes the realities, Mitchell still remembers the illusions, showing how wisdom does not replace the innocence we once had. Naivety and knowledge are not mutually exclusive. Instead, they act as a balance: innocence prevents reality from controlling us; experience stops us from getting lost in the world of romanticization. Mitchell models this on all levels through clouds (something tangible), love (something abstract), and life (something universal).

 

Sweet Home: Bitter Roots

“Beloved” isn’t just a novel it is an experience that lingers after the last page story wise and reality wise. Toni Morrison wrote an incredible story based on Sethe, a former slave and her daughter Denver. The story speaks on the physical and emotional scars of slavery. The arrival of Beloved, said to be Sethe’s dead daughter, a ghost, and one who experienced being on the boats used for slave trade, unlocks repressed memories and pushes as they are confronted.

The remarkable thing is, this is not just a story this was thousands of enslaved peoples daily lives and it truly puts it into perspective as it is easy to loose grasp of what once was. Although slavery isn’t prominent or as out there as it was the trauma, experience, its effects on this very generation(my generation), racism, colorism, dehumanization, having thought on how race can play an impact in opportunities even when it shouldn’t, still exists today.

In my class when we discussed this book the discussion on Sethe’s mothering was brought up. The question being if her killing her children when the white men came was “insanity” or “love” and what is the extent of each. Now off the bat the question was a bit off but it made me realize there might’ve not been sympathy because she was a mother or she was enslaved. To me it is a no brainer that what she did was motherly instincts of giving the slight chance that your children would experience a brutal and dehumanizing experience such as one has experienced. Therefore Sethe killing her children made sense because she took on her motherly duties. To think on the surface level of what had been done to enslaved people such as spiked collars, iron bits, iron masks, separation of families made to be hard to trace back to one another, breeding, hunted, etc. all these dehumanizing things are done to another human being because of the color of skin. It makes a 100% sense that Sethe as a human being, as a mother, as an enslaved person, would in a heartbeat save her children from such a life.

At the end of the day the only person who can question Sethe is Denver and the only people to fully know are those at Sweet Home and other enslaved people. “Beloved” challenges us to confront the truths of history and to acknowledge that slavery’s shadow still darkens our present.

Story’s of Present and Past

A common troupe weaved throughout many stories is the effect of the past on the present. This is especially true in Beloved by Toni Morison. The story takes place after many of the story’s major events and turning points: Baby Sugg’s death, Beloved’s death, everything that happened at sweet home, all of Paul D’s experiences. However, it is not of story solely of the past. The past simply plays its role in the telling of the story by allowing certain moments to be more masked than they normally would be.

For example, as the book begins we are given a quick summary of why there is only Sethe and Denver in the house, then we are told about how the spirit of a baby is haunting 124. We aren’t outright told about who the baby is until much later in the story, the first time is mentioned is after the scene in the clearing where Beloved chokes Sethe and Denver confronts her over it and her intentions. The book gives many hints to allow this situation to be illuminated beforehand, however rereading the story with all the knowledge from the whole book, every action each character takes makes more sense. Denver’s inwardness and loneliness a direct effect of her fear of her mother, the loom of 124 and its repulsion of others, Beloved attitude of destruction and possessiveness, etc. Each character and moment is written with the whole story in mind whilst maintaining the secrecy of important moments in the story. This is what a true story of both present and past looks like, one in which some or most of the events in the plot have already happened and are only slowly revealed purposely to achieve an effect of confusion and mystery.

Because so many of the actions of the characters we follow are determined by events we have no information of, we get this skewed and crafted sense of what characters are like without the why. Morrison uses this to allow for certain things to be ascertained by bits and pieces of information here and there, allow room for the gray of things and speculation before the truth is revealed. In doing so she creates this air of darkness surrounding moments in the story, as well as allowing for these really cool perspectives and lenses that are used throughout the story. For example, the way Sethe and Paul D talk about each other after their reunion, the shifts in tone, the revealing of past moments to justify their choices and descriptions of each other is one of my favorite uses of this. Another one is whenever Denver’s perceptive is used. It almost feels kind of claustrophobic, as she is constantly surveilling and observing all of the other characters. This effect is a result of her reaction to what Sethe did to her and her fear of it happening again. Additionally, the way she talks about Beloved in comparison the other characters is kind of Morrison’s way of showing both of their importance to the story, as well as showing Denver’s protectiveness of Beloved. In conclusion, Toni Morrison’s use of  manipulation of information is one of the major elements that make Beloved such an amazing book.

The Grounding Method

Past events and memories of vivid trauma are strong throughout Beloved by Toni Morrison. However, what is revealed to be stronger is the grounding method presented by Morrison, including taking back control of your body, which is often shown through the motif of feet.

Feet are a symbol within the story of the source of humanity. Feet can take you places you have never been before and move you to remember the ground you are standing on. One instance of this is when Amy, the white woman who saves Sethe from dying while she is having her child, rubs Sethe’s feet. Sethe describes that it hurts, but in a way, it also keeps her from dying.

The pain that she feels is real, and it is a positive thing because it is a reality. It marks the step and action she took by walking away from the system of slavery, allowing her to, in a way, move on.

Feet are also brought up once again later in the book when Paul D reminds Sethe that she has two feet, not four. He reminds her that while her past has taken over aspects of her reality, such as the haunting that Beloved is a part of, she still has two feet. I believe that through saying this, he is advising her to remember her body and that she still has control over it. I think that this symbolizes the step of taking back your own body, as it is the one thing no one can forever take from you. In other words, Paul D is using the grounding method to remind Sethe that she is a human being. 

Beloved’s Symbolism

While reading Beloved, specifically Part III, I started to see Beloved as a reenactment of Sethe’s life. When Beloved first comes “Out of the dark”, and when she speaks about her time there, I view it and it seems to resemble the slavery Sethe was undergoing as a whole. And when Beloved first comes out of the river and into Sethe’s life, she seems very childlike, quiet, and almost clueless, similar to how Sethe probably felt when she was first escaped from slavery and in a world where it seemed like everyone who wasn’t a slave had a big leg up on her, and she was new to this new free world. Beloved describes “the dark” as a place where you lose yourself as a whole, which is how Sethe experienced slavery. When Beloved was coming out of the dark, in the punctuation-less chapter, the sentences were wrote in a breathless, stressed, panicked, survival focused manner, which, again, is how Sethe described escaping Sweet Home and the events that occurred around that time. Even the moment where Beloved assaults Paul D. seems to mirror the assault that Sethe went through, even though the roles were reversed. A big moment that made me start to really develop this idea was when Beloved started to get really hungry and was described as pregnant, which echoes Sethe’s state as she escaped and became free. Then Beloved disappeared, similar to how Sethe was isolated and locked away from society besides Denver (and Paul D at the end) in 124. That last one is a little bit of a reach, but another thing the disappearance could represent is Sethe’s past fading and becoming a tough subject that isn’t talked about, is buried deep down, and sort of forgot about, at least by everyone besides Sethe. I wonder what the significance of this is, if it was on purpose. Maybe it was Beloved trying to place herself in her mom’s shoes to try to understand why she was killed?

The Weight of Memory in Beloved

While reading Beloved, I felt like it was a world where people never really let the past go. What stood out to me was how Morrison shows trauma as something staying inside the characters, shaping their choices even after the events are over. The book doesn’t treat memory as something lurking in the back but instead how the past can be brought up in any situations the most basic moments.

I think it was interesting how differently each character responds to what they’ve gone through. Sethe tries to ignore her memories, Paul D tries to forget them, and Denver grows up surrounded by trauma she never truly experienced. Watching Denver go out into the community and look for help felt like one of the most important moments in the book. It shows a hope for healing, not just by forgetting the past, but confronting it with support.

What I like about this book is how it shows a part of history that many try to ignore. In school, we usually learn the facts about slavery but not how people navigated through life after. Morrison forces us to see how trauma doesn’t just stop when that event ends. It affects those who come after it for generations, influencing the way people live their lives.

Overall,  I think it made me think about how present memory is and how healing from the past is not simple. It showed me that confronting pain is sometimes the best step toward moving forward, for anyone.

The Important Parts of Beloved

I really enjoyed the novel Beloved. I enjoyed the way the characters shift throughout the story, keeping readers engaged while also deepening our understanding of history. One part that both confused and intrigued me was the use of flashbacks and time shifts. These moments helped me see how certain triggers pulled characters back into painful memories, creating new layers of the characters and settings, while also revealing parts to the characters lives that were often hidden because of their traumatic experiences. Considering this, I believe the most impactful part of the book is its focus on the aftermath of the characters’ trauma.

In school, I often feel that learning about slavery and the brutal past so many endured usually centers on the violence aspects, lynching, burning, and then jumping straight to a time when society supposedly moved on and “accepted everyone.” But I do not believe that is realistic. The trauma people experienced didn’t just fade, it was held through their lives and passed down through generations. Even in my own family, my grandmother has shared stories about her parents working on plantations. I liked how Toni Morrison focused on the aftershocks of these experiences and how they shaped people into being both resilient and afraid. This fear often kept individuals from coming together, even within communities of people who shared similar experiences, something we see toward the end of the novel. At the same time, this fear and pain pushed later generations to want something better. For example, Denver decides to find a job to support her family. She isn’t afraid to step outside the place that has always been safe for her, partly because she hasn’t endured the same dangers her mother faced. She’s willing to do what she can to break generational trauma and ensure a better future. I feel it’s unfair to treat slavery as a simple label on a timeline from point A to point B. It remains a deeply important part of history, tied to the families who lived through it. That’s why I appreciate Morrison’s diction and the powerful dynamics she creates for each character.

Overall, it was a great read!

Seeing in Color: Viewing of the Present and the Past

While reading Beloved by Toni Morrison, the motif of color and the importance it holds is something that stuck out to me. The importance of color, or more specifically the lack thereof, plays an important role in understanding the memories of the characters.

In Beloved, most of the time color is not used when describing settings in the present. In 1873 124, the slaughterhouse, or Sethe’s work are absent of color. It is in memories, specifically strong ones, where color is used to describe the scene and is prominent. Baby Sugg’s lavender, Paul D’s red heart, and Amy Denver’s velvet are all examples of prominent memories that are strengthened by color. 

The idea of color as a way to remember the past made me think of the idea that the past is often seen as lacking in color. Both literally such as in photographs but also in the sense that the past seems so distant to us that we don’t think about the significance it might still hold because it is not “coloring” our present. Slavery is often viewed as something of the past, something that is distant or not in color but Sethe and Paul D’s colorful memories about it serve as a reminder that traumatic events, such a slavery, still hold weight in the present. Color bridges characters’ pasts and presents, illustrating painful memories and serving as a powerful language. 

Healing and Memory in Beloved

Beloved is an incredible display of trauma and the journey to healing. Throughout the novel, many characters go through extremely traumatic events and experiences. The novel incorporates frequent memories and small time jumps to both represent how healing is not linear, and demonstrate how the effects of trauma can be recurring as many people carry the weight of memory and remembrance that continuously connects them with and prevents them from escaping their past. I noticed that the book also focuses on how each character dealt with trauma and how they approached the concept of healing. Baby Suggs created a strong connection to her community and commiserated with everyone around her who went through very similar experiences. She decided to embrace every emotion along with others in her community, which showed she greatly valued community support and deep emotional awareness in her path to healing. 

On the other hand, Sethe is caught in the struggle between repression and remembrance, as she tries to forget the horrors of Sweet Home and is simultaneously and inadvertently transported back to her traumatic experiences through her vivid memories brought about by anything around her. As Paul D comes back into her life, he offers her a path to healing as he provides emotional support and helps her take care of the family. However, he also carries the horrors of Sweet Home with him and is therefore a constant reminder of the experiences Sethe is actively trying to repress. 

Beloved is another example of a character that embodies trauma. Beloved is not only a symbol of Sethe’s trauma from the day she was killed, but also a manifestation of the past. Her presence and rapid rise to significance signify that she demands acknowledgement in the same manner that the memories resulting from trauma demand acknowledgement. Often, traumatic experiences cannot be repressed, which is shown in the book by how memories follow characters and how characters embody past trauma, forcing characters to directly face what they have been through. 

Haunted By The Past

A big idea that has resurfaced for me through my reading of Beloved by Toni Morrison has been how psychological trauma continues to radiate in our lives, even if the traumatic event is over.

Sethe’s traumas from the past don’t just disappear, even if she escaped from the plantation she was sold to. Her traumas linger and consistently pop up in her daily life (shown through countless flashbacks), regardless of her “freedom.” So, is she truly free?

Free from the long days and nights at Sweet Home, sure, but not free from her aches of the psychological trauma that came with it. The memories of what Sethe endured continue to haunt her, shaping how she thinks, acts, and gives and receives love. Every interaction she has with Denver, or Paul D, or even Beloved, is an interaction dulled by her suffering.

The flashbacks that Sethe frequently try to suppress only make the memories stronger. What might this say about our own lives? In my opinion, it shows us that the more we try to bury our trauma, the more it will take over out lives. As I continue reading, I wonder how might Sethe’s recurring memories of her enslavement and the supernatural feel of the book tie into her life.

Morrison beautifully demonstrates that trauma does not simply end when physical freedom is gained, but is carried with you for the rest of your life.

In my opinion, Beloved,  (the book itself), serves as a jarring reminder that as much as slavery may be overlooked, we as a society must remind ourselves of the immense pain people went through beyond the physical aspects.

Is Beloved just Black and White?

There’s been recurring motifs on color throughout Beloved: the white stairs, the orange squares on the blanket, red, etc. However, much of the time, it seems to be in relation to a lack of color, and the subsequent craving of color that follows. For example, the only color Baby Suggs was able to experience was the orange squares on the blanket, leading her to crave more color.

Much of the time, when someone describes something as “black and white”, its taken as being very literal, either right or wrong. I think this can also be applied to Beloved, specifically Sweet Home and Paul and Sethe’s experience there as slaves. We’re told that in Sweet Home, they were treated with a certain degree of kindness, not beaten under the control of the Garners. In fact, Mr. Garner essentially bragged to the other slave owners that his slaves were “men” while they spoke about how a slave could never be a real person. I think, through the lack of color, Morrison was attempting to depict how despite the fact that yes, the Sweet Home Men and Sethe were treated kindly on the plantation, they were still slaves. Just because they were treated with kindness does not take away from the fact that the Garners were still slaves owners. Kindness is a basic human right, and to consider how treating a slave as a human was seen as outlandish reveals how black and white the mindset is: there is no “good” slave owner, only those who owned slaves and those who didn’t.

However, in relation to Sethe and Paul, there seems to be more. While they originally are determined to hide away from there memories, through their shared experiences/trauma, it seems that they have become more willing to open up about their past. I believe that Beloved has made them able to see more than just the horrors of their past, but she has allowed them to take those traumas and use it in the present, strengthening their relationship and each other as a result. In this sense, I find the use of color really interesting: that slavery may be seen as black and white, but the experiences of slavery allow for someone to be more than their past, allowing them to think past black and white.

Just How Big is the Universe and What is Our Place in it?

In Exit West, there seems to be a repetitive motif in relation to space or the Universe in genera. There’s a lot of repetition in terms of the sky, the stars, the milky way, etc. Combining this with the syntax of the story, I think this is a really interesting choice of Hamid to do. In my opinion, it’s meant to show that, despite this being the story of a single family (or only a few people) in a time of war, this is not meant to consolidate the many experiences people hold in times of war. By showing how small Saeed and Nadia are, it takes away from the idea that they are central characters in the world. While they are main characters in the story, the juxtaposition of them with the universe and syntax of the story illustrates how their story is only one of many.


While this may show how small, and perhaps powerless, they are in comparison to the events going on around them, this strengthens the novel at the same time. By emphasizing Nadia and Saeeds story as one of many, Hamid reveals just how expansive the of impact political violence and war is not just on one country, but the entire world. Telling a story of a few people, demonstrating how their story is simply part of a much larger story, reveals the powerful impact of that event, the violence.

Crying vs Caring

When I first started reading The Stranger by Albert Camus my initial reaction to Mersault’s lack of grieving over his mothers death was to judge him and his character. “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (3). He didn’t cry, didn’t talk much about her or her life, not even in his own head, and he even seemed detached at her funeral and was more focused on other factors like the heat and time: “The sun was beginning to bear down on the earth and it was getting hotter by the minute. I don’t know why we waited so long before getting under way” (15) and like he didn’t care at all, not through what he was letting others see of him and not even in his own head.

But when later thinking about what I had read, I realized I can heavily relate to Mersault and that I was being very hypocritical. When my own grandfather and great-aunt passed away, I found myself not being able to cry both when hearing and processing the news and at both of their funerals. I even tried to force myself to cry as I thought that was the societal, right-thing to do, and I really did feel horrible and I felt like crying, but I just couldn’t. From what others could see of me, they probably viewed me similar to how they would view Mersault if they read the book, careless and almost selfish, but, at least speaking for myself, there is more to a persons grief and emotions than just what is visible. From where I am right now in the book, just after the third chapter, I can’t say for sure if Mersault does care at all about his mothers death, but I also can’t say that he does not, although he does say and think some things that I wouldn’t have, like: “It didn’t mean anything” (3), but I still believe that I judged him too soon initially. He seems very distracted and sort of in denial about the whole situation, and I think maybe he doesn’t want to process or let himself grieve her death. Everybody grieves differently, and just because someone doesn’t appear to be struggling it doesn’t mean that they aren’t. I’ll keep this in mind when reading this book and others, as well as in real life situations.

How Literature Changed Me

In my English class this year, we read many books. Some revolved around identity and romanticism while others focused on change and the past. However, the most important, yet interesting book to me was Shakespeare’s King Lear. King Lear focuses on the downfall of a central character, then after a character transformation, a complete change in values to a more purposeful life. King Lear was the central character who focused on his riches, domination, but, most importantly, power over others. Before his character growth, Lear spent little time with those around him and struggled to formulate real connections with those around him, including his own daughters. While I am certainly very different from King Lear, I do notice a few similarities between our values and actions. 

While I did not banish a loved one because they did not display their love for me, I frequently sacrificed spending time with my friends and family as throughout high school the majority of my time was spent maintaining my academic rigor and grades. It could be said that I valued my studies over my connections with others which is similar to Lear’s value of power to his connection with others. While reading King Lear and working in class discussions, I was amazed by the different ways in which Lear changed. Admitting he is mad, weeping and apologizing to his third daughter, to dying of a broken heart, King Lear completely shifted his values from his power to his family which similarly inspired me and my values.

Although I can not take back what I used to value and the choices I made, I have realized that I should prioritize the connections in my life more than anything else. As shown by King Lear, despite him losing both his powers and his daughter, it was his daughter’s death that caused him the most pain. Having to go to college next fall, I unfortunately will fall out of contact with a lot of my current friends. However in a new space, I look forward to putting myself out there and making connections with people in any way possible whether it be at a library, student club, or sports event. At college, I look forward to meeting new people everyday and studying on the side. Although I may not have changed as much as King Lear, literature has forced me to open my eyes to subtle changes I can make to my daily lifestyle. While many of the novels we read this year did have deep meanings and depicted important aspects of life, King Lear was the strongest example of how I have been impacted by this class. 

SNL and the Fragility of Democracy

A few weeks ago, I watched the Founding Fathers Cold Open on Saturday Night Live. On my first watch, I thought that this was hilarious and I was cracking up throughout the skit however, when my AP Lit teacher asked my classmates and I to analyze a modern piece of satire, I decided to revisit this particular skit and I found it to be kind of scary.

The skit begins with the “founding fathers” signing the Declaration of Independence. “John Hancock” then asks “Alexander Hamilton” to share his opinions on their new nation to which Lin Manuel Miranda comes out and begins to rap about what he hopes for in this new country. Within his first few lines, “Hamilton” is interrupted by “Donald Trump” and the remainder of the skit is “Trump” discussing the future that he envisions for the country.

Throughout the skit, many satirical techniques are employed however, here I will only name a few.

During the skit, the actor that played Trump consistently used youthful slang such as “zesty”, “take the L”, and “in my ___ era”. This is incredibly ironic because both the current president (Trump) and the most recent president (Biden)  were the oldest presidents in the History of the United States. By creating this binary between young and old, SNL is showing how ridiculous it is that for people so close to the end of their lives to take on the kind of responsibility of running a country just as it would be crazy for a tween or a teenager to run the U.S.

The fact that SNL made this skit about Trump’s first week back in office a parody to the signing of the Declaration of Independence is another example of satire. Some of the things mentioned were either a step back from the progress that society has made with equality since the signing of the Declaration of Independence or it was something that the founding fathers were trying to avoid in their new country such as having a king (the skit implied that Trump may one day take on a role similar to that of a king).

Finally, SNL used both hyperbole and understatement  in creation of this skit. When “Trump” first interrupts Miranda, he says that he is in his “king era”. This can be viewed as a hyperbole as while President Trump is currently using a lot of power, it is unlikely that he will adopt a role similar to a king. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the writers of this skit used understatement to illustrate the unhappiness of the American people after his first week in office. To show this, near the end of the skit when “Trump” is talking about the all time high of the price of eggs he exclaims, “Who would have thought it’d be easier to get a ceasefire in Gaza then bring down the price of eggs?”

While the goal of SNL is mainly comedy, most of their skits also provide a commentary on some aspect of society. In this particular instance, they bring to light how worrisome this bombardment of executive orders was and how the United States may continue to change in a way that many do not believe to be positive in the coming years. SNL is trying to make light of a situation that they believe to be potentially dangerous but they are also cluing in society for what is to come.

Wish You Were Here – My Favorite Song of All Time

Hearing this song in the background of my childhood, I had never looked into it. One day, I decided to play it on my guitar. Singing along with the simple chords, I sobbed, never having felt more connected to a song in my life. Wish You Were Here is a concept album by Pink Floyd which is generally considered to be about missing someone that you have lost. The song “Wish You Were Here” on the album serves as the crux of the album, as Rodger Waters and David Gilmour (two Pink Floyd band members) reflect on the loss of the original frontman and songwriter of the band: Syd Barret. While the meaning of this song is mostly focused on the loss of Syd Barret, through this is analysis we may find that there is more than one way to interpret this poem.

The song begins a short recorded speaking clip. Before the very first sung lyric:

So, so you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain

This lyric uses contrasting imagery to convey the frustration one may have when losing someone they care about. The immediate feeling conveyed is that loss can be confusing, and it can be hard to know what to feel.

One of my favorite lyrics in the song comes soon after :

Did you exchange/ A walk-on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?

This metaphor provides a commentary on loss but also manages to connect the loss of Syd Barret to the experience of relationships as a whole. Often times in relationships, we find ourselves getting lost in other people, devoting everything to them, especially when we lose them. A “walk-on part in the war” means you may not feel that you are receiving much attention or screen time, but that your life is interesting. Meanwhile, when someone loses other people, they may feel that suddenly they are the center of attention, but that they are stuck in a sorrowful cage. This line creates a contrast of two experiences, connecting self-identity with the presence of loved ones.

Before I elaborate on the last stanza of this poem, I’d like to point out the structure. In this poem, particularly the 2nd and 3rd stanza, the poem consists of mostly questions. These questions communicate the complex emotions and confusions that come with being in any kind of relationship or caring about anyone. These questions refer to all aspects of life, showing how interconnected love is to our reality. In the final stanza, the questions are reduced, and there are several sentences before the speaker makes the statement

What have we found?
The same old fears
Wish you were here

Comparing this to the first stanza, there is a noticeable similar structure in these two sections. I interpreted this similarity as a representation of how life and relationships can often feel circular, as the same old feelings come up again and again throughout all different relationships in our lives.

My interpretation is cemented by the use of the line above, as the childlike fears and craving for a person connects to the very first relationship that people have in their lives – their parents. This song uses poetic language to communicate the sameness, frustration, love, and loss that come with relationships, making it a timeless, heart-wrenching poem.

“Poetry” analysis of Chopin’s (wordless) Nocturne Op. 27 No. 2

I don’t really listen to music with lyrics. Thankfully, my teacher said that I could pick a piece without lyrics as long as I was willing to defend it as poetry. My piece is titled “Nocturne,” Opus 27 No. 2. It is by Frédéric Chopin. This piece is part of Chopin’s nocturnes, some of which are famous (such as Op. 9 no. 2).

Now we get into the meat of the argument. So, how is a piece without words…poetic? Let’s consider aspects of Perrine’s definition of poetry. Perrine’s chief point is that poetry conveys experience. This nocturne does that. Consider the very meaning of the word nocturne: night. Every nocturne is a representation of a night, whether that be calm, windy, stormy, or frightful–usually, it’s calm and melancholy, as it is in this case. But really, a nocturne (and any piece of music) invites the listener to steep their own experiences in the music, enriching and deepening their experience of that experience, if you will. To illustrate this point, please consider this example:

An elderly man, a widower, sits alone on a park bench in a city park at night. A streetlight stands patiently above him, illuminating the bench. He sees the bustling of the city outside the park’s premises: the tall buildings, the scurrying traffic. The night is cool and breezy. Leaves tumble about close to the ground; trees above him sway gently. He is listening to this Chopin nocturne. As the piece begins, he reminisces about the times that he shared with his wife. Perhaps he recalls the feel that he had forgotten of her head cradled in the nook of his shoulder, his head on top of hers, watching old movies together. Or perhaps he remembers the tenderness of her smile on a light stroll through this very park in a golden afternoon.

Instead of words, Chopin uses aria-like melodies–that is, a solo for a soprano voice but for the piano–over a sweeping arpeggiated accompaniment. Without getting into specific music theory, Chopin’s deliberate moments of tension and release of the harmony–for example, the high note at 0:19 in this recording (the same one as above)–create a duality between calm and bitterness, creating melancholy. The piece evokes the experiences of the audience–in this case, the widower’s memories of his wife–aiding the audience in immersing themselves in and deepening their memory of their experiences.

Another specific part of Perrine’s definition of poetry that applies to this piece (and to virtually all instrumental music) is a communication between the speaker and the audience–to put it into musical terms, the performer and the audience. If you ever go to a live concert, whatever the genre, you’ll feel the energy in the space–but allow me to specifically cover classical music. Every performer and even every performance is different. As a music performer myself, there is a certain energy and emotion that a performer must give the music in order to create this poetic, emotional effect. Just as there is a world of difference between having a computer-generated voice and a professional voice actor read a poem, there is a world of difference between a person who plays robotically and a person who plays with emotion and from the heart. You can see that emotion on the performer’s–Maria João Pires’–face, especially in the beginning. This emotional communication, if you will, from the performer to the audience, is specifically what enables that emotional response within the audience. Just as in poetry, it is a communication between the speaker and the audience. That emotional response deepens whatever experience that the piece evokes in the audience: a loved one, better times in the past, hope for the future, the joy and pain of being alive, night, really anything that comes to mind.

The final aspect of Perrine’s definition that I would like to write about here is poetry’s nature of being condensed & concentrated, containing a higher “voltage” per word, as Perrine states. I’d argue that it’s similar for instrumental music. The piece is only 6 minutes long, and there are plenty of other emotion-provoking pieces out there with even shorter runtimes–3 minutes, 1 minute even. In this short runtime, the piece takes the listener on a journey–no, an adventure. It begins with a calm, bittersweet melody and texture. The nocturne is calm, and the night it represents is calm. Elements of tension begin brewing at 0:54; they bubble at 1:00 and boil at 1:07. The night is biting. But at 1:26, the night backs away. The tension releases, but not all the way. It begins to boil again. From then until 2:00, there is a mini-journey: tension rises and relaxes, and the listener doesn’t know where the piece will go. It boils, dissipates; boils, dissipates. Then, at 2:00, there is release. The main theme returns, and the night is calm again. In the span of just two minutes, Chopin and Pires have taken us on a journey of tension and release through this night, and the piece isn’t even halfway over yet. That’s high voltage. Chopin uses this journey to convey an experience of night–a specific kind of night, calm yet bitter–and perhaps deepen an experience that the audience has had themselves, as in the example with the widower.

I think that this piece, Chopin’s Nocturne Opus 27 No. 2, despite containing no words, is musical poetry.

Morrison’s Final Message

My initial reading of the final chapter in Beloved left me both confused and intrigued. The repeated phrase “It was not a story to pass on” seemed to be an almost central yet paradoxical message. As time passes, the entire community including Sethe, Denver, and Paul D forget about the chilling Beloved incident, soon describing it as if it were only a bad dream. However, Morrison still referenced the faint existence of Beloved in the last couple of paragraphs. I believe this final passage serves to emphasize the importance of remembering past trauma, no matter how painful it might be.

This phrase “It was not a story to pass on” symbolizes how traumatic histories are often excluded from official narratives. This phrase critiques the societal practice of often suppressing uncomfortable truths. However, the very act of writing Beloved, a story centered on the horrors and experiences of enslaved people, defies this tendency. The phrase also functions as a warning. To “not pass on” the story may seem like an act of love, sparing future generations from its pain. Yet Morrison shows that forgetting such histories comes at a cost: The loss of memory leads to the disconnection of communities and individuals from their roots. For example, Beloved’s ghost represents the unspoken and unresolved traumas of slavery, haunting those who seek to move forward without addressing the past.

By ending Beloved with this message, Morrison urges readers to reflect on their own role in either remembering or forgetting history, emphasizing that the past, though painful, cannot and should not be completely silenced. Additionally, this ending pays tribute to the humanity of those who endured the unfortunate horrors of slavery, ensuring that their stories are not erased but honored and preserved.

Freedom in Beloved: More than Just Escape

In Beloved, Toni Morrison confronts the idea of whether freedom simply means liberation from physical chains. Sethe is free from slavery, but the trauma she carries with her continues to haunt her. The ghost of Beloved serves as a symbol of the fact that she cannot escape her trauma in the present.

What strikes me most is how Sethe’s freedom is inextricably interwoven with her memories, with feelings of guilt, and with a sense of loss. Real freedom for Sethe is not about fleeing from slavery but about the efforts to come to terms with what happened with her in those terrible years, with the choice she was forced to make.

Morrison makes it clear that freedom is not a moment of flight; instead, it’s an ongoing process of healing. Characters in Beloved learn quite vividly that to be truly free, they have to face the ghosts of their past, literal and metaphorical. The novel does not offer easy answers; rather, it discloses that freedom is about reconciliation with the past and learning how to move forward, even when it seems impossible.

Time and Memory in Beloved

One of the most interesting and compelling aspects of Beloved is that its story does not follow chronological pathMorrison disrupts time and memory, indicating the non-linear mechanism of trauma.  The whole novel constantly switches between past and present, with characters often experiencing flashbacks, fragmented memories, and moments of reflection.  This  disrupted timeline corresponds with what happens to the characters throughout the entire novel, especially Sethe, who is constantly haunted by her past.

By manipulating time, Morrison explores memory on a deeper level. Characters relive moments from their past, but often not in a linear, cohesive manner.  For example, the traumatic experiences of slavery and her decision to kill her child are recalled by Sethe in flashes, often without clear transitions.  This reflects how trauma doesnt follow a neat, linear path; it haunts and disrupts, often emerging in bursts.  In this way, the fragmented structure of the novel allows the reader to experience the psychological trauma caused by Sethes difficult past, but also the broader effects of slavery on African American history.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén