Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: Romanticism

“Whoever You are Holding Me Now in Hand” is Human Behavior

The song “Human Behavior” by Björk on her album Debut interprets “Whoever You Are Holding Me Now in Hand” by Walt Whitman perfectly. Björk’s song describes how uncertain human actions and emotions can be, yet it’s something that is unavoidable. This leads to a broader theme: society is unpredictable in all senses and controversial, yet still has a satisfying quality within actions.

Björk’s title for the song is very self-explaintory. She dives into how humans act with her lyrics, she says,

“There’s definitely, definitely, definitely no logic to human behavior but yet so, yet do irresistible.” – Björk

This line correlates with the poem because while Björk is discussing the unpredictability of human actions, so does Walt Whitman. In his poem, he takes on the persona of the book itself. The book addresses the reader and conveys the unpredictability of how people will react after they read it.

“But these leaves conning you con at peril, For these leaves and me you will not understand, They will elude you at first and still more afterward, I will certainly elude you. Even while you should think you had unquestionably caught me, behold! Already you see I have escaped you.” – Walt Whitman

He understands that he, himself, is controversial, and he cannot control the actions of those who read it. He also really isn’t what most will think at first glance. Whitman and Björk alike both have the same outlook when it comes to the behavior of anyone who indulges in their art forms. Another point Björk and Whitman share is that humans are not entirely predictable through emotions either.

Björk describes human emotion as a light switch; they are able to flip their emotions fast. She says,

“They’re terribly, terribly, terribly moody of human behavior then all of a sudden, turn happy and they and my here after but, oh, to get involved in the exchange of human emotions is ever so, ever so satisfying…” – Björk

Her outlook on emotions is similar to Whitman’s, but also in the fact that she describes the viewing or interaction of these emotions as satisfying. She believes that the emotions of others may be feeble but also can give satisfaction. Whitman does this in a similar way through his persona of the book. He says,

“Nor is it by reading it you will aquire it, Nor do those know me best who admire me and vauntingly praise me, Nor will the candidates for my love (unless at most a very few) prove victorious, Nor will my poems do good only, they will do just as much evil, perhaps more, For all is useless without that which you may guess at many times and not hit, that which I hinted at; Therefore release me and depart on your way.” – Walt Whitman

The book is conveying that he is very controvertial and may upset those who happen to read him but remains unforgiving about it. The reason why is to prove that all these requirements are utilized through human emotion, if you had none the poem would be useless as Whitman describes. Through this warning, he acknoledges the fact that human reactions to his writing will differ but that proves his point of how satisfying that can be.

“I taste a liquor never brewed” and “Drunk in love”

Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s 2013 song “Drunk in Love” explores the overwhelming, intoxicating power of romantic and physical passion. Like Emily Dickinson’s poem “I taste a liquor never brewed,” the song uses the metaphor of intoxication to describe an emotional high that feels beyond reality.

Beyoncé uses both literal and metaphorical intoxication to describe her love

We woke up in the kitchen saying‘How the hell did this shit happen?’ Oh babyDrunk in love we be all night

Here, drunkenness becomes a metaphor for the loss of control that accompanies deep emotional and physical connection. This metaphor continues throughout the song, emphasizing that love, like alcohol, can blur reality, lead to impulsive behavior, and continue into morning confusion.

We be all night, and everything alright

No complaints for my body, so fluorscent under these lights, boy I’m drinking

This lyric captures just how loud and unapologetic Beyoncé’s version of love is. She’s completely consumed by it, out in public, and unbothered by judgment.

It may not seem that Dickinson’s poem captures intoxication in the same way as Beyoncé’s. Beyonce’s use of intoxication emphasizes the sensuality and passion of love, with the need for physical and romantic connection. Whereas Dickinson seems to be enraptured by an almost spiritual intoxication with life itself.  While her tone seems more subtle, the last lines of the poem reveal that she, too, is out of control

Till Seraphs swing their snowy Hats – 

And Saints – to windows run – 

Dickinson will continue to drink until people in the neighborhood, “Seraphs,” and “Saints,” run to their windows to see what’s going on. She is proud to be so intoxicated on life, stumbling around the streets, thriving on nature. She proudly declares herself as

…the little Tippler
Leaning against the – Sun!

For her time, this was radical. Dickinson dared to write about intoxication with total disregard, just like Beyonce, she leans fully into the ecstasy and freedom of love, regardless of who’s watching.

Although Beyonce and Emily Dickinson are separated by genre and time, they both use poetic language to capture what it means to be “drunk,” not with alcohol, but with a passion for life, and the experiences that come with it. Through metaphors, exaggerations, and symbolic imagery, they show us how powerful emotions can take over and make us lose control in the best way possible.

Nature and Nostalgia

The song “In the Aeroplane Over the Sea” by Neutral Milk Hotel and section 6 of “Song of Myself” have a lot in common, including the poem’s imagery, themes, and overall mood.

In terms of imagery, it is very evident that these two things are very similar. The poem focuses on a lot of imagery to establish a setting and specific mood for the poem and the audience. While this song focuses on using the imagery to establish an atmosphere, while also gives the audience a feeling of being with the author in that very moment. The lyric in the song, “There is music that sounds from the street/There are lights in the clouds.” This is taking control of many of the five senses the audience has, and invites them to look deeper into the poem, and uses itself as a passage to that very meaning.

The themes of the poem are also very similar between the pieces. The idea of death is a recurring theme and is mentioned throughout each piece of media. It is more obvious within the first stanza of this song, and is not exactly stated during Song of Myself, but is heavily referenced and insinuated. The song is mainly about memory, and looking back on a better time in the author’s life. Specifically,y a love interest named Anna. While Whitman takes a look and dives into death as a whole, and rebirth through nature, this song focuses on experiences, and compares her appearance to that of a beautiful landscape.

Lastly, the mood of the poem compared to the song is way different. The poem is bleak, but also hopeful. It celebrates life while also acknowledging death. This song, while celebrating life, takes a hard look at nostalgia and memories. These differences look at many different approaches to death and loss, and make them more similar than they are different.

 

What Walt Whitman and Billie Eilish Have in Common

Much like the poem “Song of Myself” by Walt Whitman provides an overarching view of his opinion of the human experience, Billie Eilish’s “BIRDS OF A FEATHER” provides a similar view point. Eilish released Birds of a Feather as the second single of her album “Hit Me Hard and Soft” in July 2024. Eilish uses repetition, imagery, and an extended metaphor in order to illustrate the all consuming nature of relationships alongside their temporary nature.

Eilish repeats the word “forever” many times throughout the song whether it be in the context of a long lasting joy or a long lasting sorrow. This repetition allows the listener to understand the all consuming power of this relationship for her. In addition, in many occasions where this word was used, it appears to imply that an important part of her life has ended and that she will therefore have to go through “forever” without that piece of her life. Eilish also repeats the word “‘Til” many times which could work to imply an approaching ending or the remembrance of a past ending. While the lyrics to the song are sad, the song sounds almost hopeful. I am not sure about each and every one of her listeners but for me, this dichotomy alongside her description of the comings and goings of “forever” made the song increasingly powerful and it added a layer to its complexity.

By using the imagery of the phrase

‘Til I’m in the grave

Eilish allows the listener to fall into a different world and picture themselves in her shoes.

Simultaneously, the phrase is used to bring her audience into her headspace. She is so in love with this one person that she can not imagine living any kind of life without them. Later in the song, she uses imagery to further this point. She sings,

and if I’m turnin’ blue, please don’t save me/nothing left to lose without my baby

Without this person that Eilish loves, to her, life is not worth living.

In addition to these little moments throughout the poem, Eilish uses the entire song as an extended metaphor for the complexities of life. Her song contains the temporary and timelessness, love and heartbreak. As a whole, she comes close to summarizing the human experience within the ins and outs of the poem that is this song.

A Tree too Weak to Stand / Ozymandias

“Ozymandias”, a poem written by Percy Bysshe Shelley, describes a traveler who encounters the remains of an ancient Egyptian statue of a pharaoh named Ozymandias. The statue was once grandeous and represented the king’s powerful status yet now it is sunken in the sand in a desert and is being overtaken by nature. The central theme of the poem that human’s accomplishments are often impermanent or fleeting and nature will out last all human activity. “A Tree Too Weak to Stand“, a song written and performed by Gordon Lightfoot, has an inverse central theme about the fragility of nature using the metaphor of a tree that is too susceptible to external forces and is eventually going to fall/perish.

Both of these works show the impermanence and futlity of life and the inevitable loss of power. “Ozymandias” describes the remnants of a once great statue in a desolate desert, showing how time erodes even the most powerful of leaders and their legacies with them. The inscriptions on the pedestal of the statue that boasts of Ozymandia’s greatness contrasts sharply with the reality of the statue now and its current state in the poem. In “A Tree Too Weak to Stand”, the song reflects on the fragility of those who are vulnerable and is shown through the imagery of a week tree. The tree itself is destined to fall and appears to not be able to stand on its own, symbolizing facing adversity and the inevitability of life eventually moving on from you. Although life will go on and eventually you may be forgotten, your impact on the Earth right now can still be felt right now.

Gordon Lightfoot uses repetition, vivid imagery, and a metaphor to symbolize people’s ability, or lack thereof, to cope from an event that creates long-term depression or damage. The repetition happens at the end of the song by repeating the phrase “And foolish I would climb once more a tree too weak to stand”, sealing the metaphor and leaving the listener with the final image of the tree hunched over sideways not being strong enough to climb. The vivid imagery is seen as a tree struggling to remain upright, highlighting its fragility and futileness of it all. The tree’s weakness could be seen as a metaphor for people’s lack of strength and its inability to stand representing the inability to overcome a problem in the face of adversity. Both “Ozymandias” and “A Tree Too Weak to Stand” represent the futileness of life and how people internally deal with this struggle.

Lua in Louisiana by Zoie & Lydia

Our poem was “I saw in Louisiana” so we chose the song “Lua” by Bright Eyes to connect with it. It is a single from the album “I’m Wide Awake, It’s Morning”.

The poem “I Saw in Louisiana a Live-Oak Growing” by Walt Whitman and the song “Lua” by Bright Eyes both explore themes of loneliness, isolation, and the struggle for emotional connection, though in different settings and styles.

There are moments of loneliness in both pieces. In the poem, the speaker observes a strong, solitary live-oak tree and admires its ability to thrive alone. He then realizes that, unlike the tree, he needs companionship to feel whole, and present.

In Lua, an emotionally distant character is portrayed. Though they are surrounded by others, the tone is personal and fragile, highlighting a deep sense of personal and shared loneliness.

Both works reflect a kind of existential solitude. Whitman’s speaker feels a yearning for intimacy that the tree doesn’t need, while “Lua” shows how even being around others doesn’t necessarily free one from inner emptiness.

Apostrophe

Throughout “Lua,” the speaker constantly addresses a “you.” Phrases are used like,

“I know that it is freezing, but I think we have to walk.”

“I know you have a heavy heart / I can feel it when we kiss.”

“Lua” – Bright Eyes

This is an example of an apostrophe, talking to someone who might not hear or respond. This creates an emotional closeness/intimacy but also a sense of distance. Real communication does not seem to happen, just like in Whitman’s poem, where the speaker is talking about someone, but we don’t know who. The speaker tries to connect, but the loneliness still lingers. 

Paradox

“We might die from medication, but we sure killed all the pain.”

“You’re looking skinny like a model with your eyes all painted black.”

“Lua” – Bright Eyes

Both dying to kill pain and looking beautiful while falling apart are paradoxes. These contradictions mirror the way loneliness operates; people do things that should heal them, but end up making the pain worse. 

Both Whitman’s poem and Bright Eyes’ song reveal an underlying Romantic understanding of loneliness. They show that nature can survive and thrive being alone, but people can’t, we need love and someone to care for us.

“Love.” and “Whoever You are Holding Me Now in Hand.”

By: Liam, Dom, Nate, and Noble

“Love.” by Kendrick Lamar featuring Zacari is a standout and unique portrayal of romantic poetry in today’s music world. Almost immediately after it’s release in 2017 on Kendrick Lamar’s album “DAMN”, “Love.” quickly jumped to 18 on the billboard’s top 100 list, and remained in the top 100 for 40 proceeding weeks. The song is a perfect example of Lamar’s individuality as an artist, and upon a deeper look, shares many similarities with Walt Whitman’s poem “Whoever You are Holding me Now in Hand”. Rather than emphasizing common themes in music such as materialism and masculinity, Lamar uses “Love.” to talk about loyalty, exposure, and religious intimacy – themes that are expressed equally in Whitman’s classic poetry.

At it’s core, Lamar’s song is built upon repetition, image, and tone – all staples of romantic poetry. A good example of Lamar’s poetry is the question repeatedly asked though “Love”.

“If I didn’t ride blade on curb, would you still love me?”

The question ponders true love in a poetic way, and creates emotional power. Lamar wonders about whether his love is true, or constructed of greed for money and fame. Combined with the recurring question, the slow and dreamy rhythm of the song creates a tone of vulnerability, emphasizing the emotional danger of the question that he asks, and the answer that he might receive. Kendrick’s verses aren’t meant to be excessively flowery. They exemplify free verse, like the work of Whitman. Kendrick’s prose is direct, but charged with emotion. Instead of distracting and blinding the audience with complex metaphors, Kendrick lays out his vulnerabilities and urges, a truly romantic approach of valuing truth over gloss and fluffy language.

Lamar’s questioning echoes Whitman’s warning in “Whoever You are Holding Me Now in Hand”: “Are you ready to love all of me, not just the parts that are available?”. In the two pieces, both Whitman and Lamar dissolve barriers between the speaker and the audience. Whitman dissolves the barriers between poetry and reader, while Lamar dissolves barriers between artists and beloved fans. Both crave an idea of total love. Not superficial, or transactional, but embracing, and lasting. Both works also bring out themes of trust and risk. To hold Whitman’s “soul in hand” or the love Lamar without reservation requires a setting aside of defenses – a leap of faith. Their works both ask: will you still hold me when the hype, and idealized images fade?

In an era where so much of modern music is concerned with surface: money, status, and sex, Kendrick Lamar’s “Love.” craves an older, classic, perhaps Whitmanesque vision. That the deepest love is spiritual and everlasting, not lustful or material.

Walt Whitmans R&B theme song, “Everything, is Everything.”

“Everything, everything” is a beautifully extravagant song, sung and written by one of the most talented R&B artists, Ms. Lauryn Hill.  

My first time taking a bite of Ms. Lauryn Hill was at our very own Oak Park Records. Going through my favorite sections of music, I stumbled upon a very unique album cover. Going over to my friend and asking if she knew who Lauryn Hill was, she laughed and said, “Just you wait till you get a taste of real music. She is real music.” With high expectations, I plugged in my worn-out AirPods and began from the beginning of her album, not realizing what was about to hit my ears.  The political and radically partisan opinions that she had throughout her album were crafted in such a way that they change your views on a lot of things. For that hour and seventeen minutes I spent listening carefully to every song, a very specific song stood out to me, her 1998 song “Everything is Everything.” This R&B track evoked a feeling of love and overwhelming emotion in me. You find yourself completely lost in the world that Lauryn Hill creates, and it’s so easy to be immersed in her lyrical experience.

Mid-April of 2025, almost two years after being introduced to Ms. Hill, I was sitting in my AP literature class, re-starting another round of my favorite types of units- poetry. Excited for new material, I began to dig into a new delight of fresh poetry, and was reintroduced to the biggest romantic there is in the history of poetry, Walt Whitman shared his words in my packet. Reading through the broken sections of his poetry on pages 63-74, I felt a familiar feeling of warmth and a pang. As someone who believes in the enjoyment of the little things that carry life, from then on, I realized Walt and I would become close friends.

The tight hug that his poetry gave me reminded me of a hug a close friend once blessed me with: “Everything is everything.” In her overseen single, she speaks about a multitude of different topics, but only a few lines stuck with me the most. “Everything is everything, what is meant to be will be, and after winter must come spring.” I love Ms. Hill’s appreciation for the most mundane things, her lyrics find beauty and significance in everyday moments and ordinary things we take for granted, it’s not just “Everything is everything” that speaks on this. Whitman seems to be the same way; he carries himself for the love of the “normal.” Even from the beginning of his first poem, he speaks about atoms. What poet have you read has ever romanticized atoms?

“Every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.”

From such a simple line, there is so much one can gather, and I absolutely love how he speaks of the ordinary and how much appreciation he has for life in its simplest forms. I also love how “not formal” both Ms. Hill and Whitman are with their words; they’re conversational romantics and activists, and learned that to achieve the attention of a normal mind, you have to speak conversationally to the people you want to hear.

Both Lauryn Hill and Walt Whitman have changed my perspective on so much, being able to combine romanticism and political talk and a strong captivation with language, they have both been able to encapsulate the meanings of being a human, and what we should live and die for.

 

“Vienna” and “I’m Wife” Romantic Comparison by Noah, Nora, and Phoebe

Vienna” By Billy Joel from the album The Stranger 

The poem “I’m Wife” by Emily Dickinson is about a woman looking at her present self, who’s recently married, and looking back to times when she wished for marriage. This poem explores ideas of identity, happiness, and purpose. It begins with Emily stating how she’s “wife” now and has finished her childhood of wishful thinking and hoping. She later looks back on her life as a child and states how she believes her life is now heaven, but continues to think back to her old life while trying to convince herself that her life now is better compared to before. In the final stanza, she’s done convincing herself that things are better and refuses to reflect on her past anymore by stating “But why compare?” to finally accept the fact that all she is now is a wife.

 Romanticism is seen in this poem through it being a single moment in a normal woman’s life. This idea of a capture of a normal scene or a single moment is seen often in romantic poetry as it strays away from the strictly religious ideals that captured scenes of things like god in prior periods of history. This poem also encapsulates identity and emotion through the subject’s complex thinking about her childhood and her questioning of her current identity as a now wife. 

The song we chose to compare to “I’m Wife” is “Vienna” by Billy Joel. This song is overall a metaphor for growing older and the rush people feel to be older while still growing up. 

“Vienna waits for you.”

This famous quote from the song encapsulates the overall message of growing up and being patient about it. Our poem that we created also captures the woman’s desire to grow up and get married, as she slowly realizes that maybe she should’ve taken time and enjoyed being younger, because marriage isn’t all of what she thought it would be. 

Through Vienna and the poem, romanticism is seen through everyday moments being pictured, and they can be perfectly compared as they both reflect on growing older and memories. 

I Felt a Funeral in my Brain – Song & Poem

While there are many slightly inspired songs to I Felt a Funeral in my Brain by Emily Dickinson, there is a song that directly puts music to her words by Andrew Bird, featuring Phoebe Bridgers. They clearly have the same meaning, but being put to notes and instruments have a different way of emphasizing the poem’s point.

Throughout the song, they only repeat two stanzas, one of which being:

And then I heard them lift a box

And creak across my Soul

With those same Boots of lead, again

Then space, space began to toll

This stanza is repeated after they read through the whole poem. When these lines originally appeared, it was the turning point of the poem. It represents a funeral procession, and the box represents a coffin. The creaking and boots of lead are the biggest emphasis in the entire poem on the speaker’s suffering. The fact that the song repeats this stanza does the same. It shows the speaker’s suffering and pain from whatever mental troil they are going through.

Also, they repeat “Space, space,” which does not happen in the original poem. The diction of this in the song is that the first “space” is held out, and then the second one is much shorter. First of all, the significance of space is that it is out of our control. This focuses on the inability to prevent and control the suffering that the speaker is going through. But the second, shorter space shows that the speaker is almost has closure with it.

In addition to this, the song ends with the first stanza:

I felt a funeral in my brain

And mourners to and fro

Treading, treading ’til it seemed

That sense was breaking through

They come back to the negative connotations when prior lines mention heaven and bells. This shows that these mental problems are an emotional and nightmarish cycle.

Overall, a lot of the repetition that did not happen in the poem is very impactful in the meaning of the words.

Poetry in “Seasons”

When thinking about what makes a song poetic, “Seasons” by the indie band wave to earth comes to mind as a perfect example. This track, from their album 0.1 flaws and all, describes the complexities of love, self-doubt, and the cycle of time through  nature. The singer reflects on feelings of inadequacy and the pain of separation while holding onto hope and devotion. Using seasons as a metaphor for the emotional journey of life, “Seasons” captures the universal experience of change and renewal through vivid imagery, metaphors, and heartfelt language, illustrating the bittersweet beauty of life’s constant transformations.

The song begins with the singer confessing his feelings of inadequacy,

I can’t be your love

Look, it’s too trivial for you now.

These opening lyrics immediately set a tone of insecurity and self-doubt through the singer’s acknowledgement of his shortcomings. This vulnerable language sets an emotional foundation for the song, drawing the listener in with a relatable struggle with self-worth.

As the song progresses, the seasons become a metaphor for the emotional cycles of life. In the lines,

While the leaves withered

And grew again

You have gone far away,

the withering and regrowth of leaves symbolizes the inevitability of change, tying the natural cycle of the seasons to the singer’s sense of loss. This metaphor illustrates how life continues to move forward even when emotional connections are are left behind, creating a reflection on love and separation.

In the chorus the singer vows,

I’ll give you all my life,

My seasons

Here, ‘seasons’ symbolize the entirety of the singer’s life and emotional experiences. By offering his seasons, the singer conveys a deep and unconditional love, one that embraces both their most happy, and painful moments. This imagery suggests that proper growth require embracing life’s difficulties, giving the listener insight into the singer’s devotion.

Later in the song, the singer introduces the image of daisies,

I’ll be pushing up daisies

And bring all the chances to here

The phrase “pushing up daisies” is a common metaphor for death, but in this context, also reflects renewal and the possibility of creating something meaningful even in the face of loss. This juxtaposition of death and hope reinforces the song’s theme of cycles and transformations, suggesting that endings often are necessary to create new beginnings.

Wave to earth’s “Seasons” is a poetic narrative of love, loss, and renewal told with vivid imagery, natural metaphors, and heartfelt language. By focusing on the cycles of nature and exploring the singer’s vulnerability, the band transforms difficult emotions into a universal reflection on the beauty and pain of life’s constant changes.

Is “Bad Religion” Poetry?

Frank Ocean released “Bad Religion” as part of his album Channel Orange on July 10, 2012. Just before the album’s debut, the singer publicly came out as bisexual in a heartfelt Tumblr post. In the post, Ocean shared a deeply personal story about spending two summers with a man when he was 19, eventually falling intensely and painfully in love with him. Ocean’s album title, Channel Orange, represents his synesthesia and how everything those summers were orange.

The song “Bad Religion”central message is that unrequited love can be dangerous and all-consuming. Throughout the song, Ocean emphasizes that this love should be avoided at all costs due to its perilous consequences. Ocean also examines the parallels between unrequited love and religion, while underlining how homosexuality heightens and adds fear to the experiences.

Ocean repeatedly uses metaphorical language to communicate his theme, however he most clearly emphasizes it within the chorus when he sings,

“If it brings me to my knees

It’s a bad religion

this unrequited love”

Here, Ocean does more than just compare unrequited love to a bad religion, he defines it as such. Many people see religion as an all-powerful force within their lives that govern and dictate how they should live it. By calling unrequited love a bad religion, Frank Ocean is communicating that it has the same properties and abilities. Simultaneously, Ocean is also warning against participating in any religion that has this power as he calls it a “bad” one.

Additionally, Ocean further reveals the meaning of the song through allusions. Ocean sings,

And you say, ‘Allahu Akbar’

I told him “Don’t curse me”

Allahu Akbar is an Islamic expression that means “God is the greatest.” In one sense, the cab driver may have said this to comfort Frank, implying that no matter how enormous his troubles are, God is the greatest and will take care of them. Frank’s response exemplifies how unrequited love consumes him as he applies what the driver says to his own predicament. He instructs him not to curse him, suggesting that he does not want to serve another God because the one he has now is already a curse.

Finally, Ocean connects the homosexuality aspect of the song with the use of a simile and hyperbole when he sings,

Taxi driver

I swear I’ve got three lives

Balanced on my head like steak knifes

This poem not only depicts the narrator’s great stress and anxiety as a result of unrequited love, but it also inserts homosexual significance by stating that he must have three lives. The narrator has split his identity because he has unrequited feelings for a man. Many religions condemn homosexuality and have a history of aggressively persecuting people involved. As a result, Ocean compares it to balancing “steak knifes” on his head to underline the consequences if others find out.

After slow reading and analyzing “Bad Religion” I definitely think that the song should be considered poetry. Additionally, adding the vocals and the sounds to these lyrics deepen and intensify the meaning behind the poem as one can feel the emotions that the narrator is experiencing.

“Poetry” analysis of Chopin’s (wordless) Nocturne Op. 27 No. 2

I don’t really listen to music with lyrics. Thankfully, my teacher said that I could pick a piece without lyrics as long as I was willing to defend it as poetry. My piece is titled “Nocturne,” Opus 27 No. 2. It is by Frédéric Chopin. This piece is part of Chopin’s nocturnes, some of which are famous (such as Op. 9 no. 2).

Now we get into the meat of the argument. So, how is a piece without words…poetic? Let’s consider aspects of Perrine’s definition of poetry. Perrine’s chief point is that poetry conveys experience. This nocturne does that. Consider the very meaning of the word nocturne: night. Every nocturne is a representation of a night, whether that be calm, windy, stormy, or frightful–usually, it’s calm and melancholy, as it is in this case. But really, a nocturne (and any piece of music) invites the listener to steep their own experiences in the music, enriching and deepening their experience of that experience, if you will. To illustrate this point, please consider this example:

An elderly man, a widower, sits alone on a park bench in a city park at night. A streetlight stands patiently above him, illuminating the bench. He sees the bustling of the city outside the park’s premises: the tall buildings, the scurrying traffic. The night is cool and breezy. Leaves tumble about close to the ground; trees above him sway gently. He is listening to this Chopin nocturne. As the piece begins, he reminisces about the times that he shared with his wife. Perhaps he recalls the feel that he had forgotten of her head cradled in the nook of his shoulder, his head on top of hers, watching old movies together. Or perhaps he remembers the tenderness of her smile on a light stroll through this very park in a golden afternoon.

Instead of words, Chopin uses aria-like melodies–that is, a solo for a soprano voice but for the piano–over a sweeping arpeggiated accompaniment. Without getting into specific music theory, Chopin’s deliberate moments of tension and release of the harmony–for example, the high note at 0:19 in this recording (the same one as above)–create a duality between calm and bitterness, creating melancholy. The piece evokes the experiences of the audience–in this case, the widower’s memories of his wife–aiding the audience in immersing themselves in and deepening their memory of their experiences.

Another specific part of Perrine’s definition of poetry that applies to this piece (and to virtually all instrumental music) is a communication between the speaker and the audience–to put it into musical terms, the performer and the audience. If you ever go to a live concert, whatever the genre, you’ll feel the energy in the space–but allow me to specifically cover classical music. Every performer and even every performance is different. As a music performer myself, there is a certain energy and emotion that a performer must give the music in order to create this poetic, emotional effect. Just as there is a world of difference between having a computer-generated voice and a professional voice actor read a poem, there is a world of difference between a person who plays robotically and a person who plays with emotion and from the heart. You can see that emotion on the performer’s–Maria João Pires’–face, especially in the beginning. This emotional communication, if you will, from the performer to the audience, is specifically what enables that emotional response within the audience. Just as in poetry, it is a communication between the speaker and the audience. That emotional response deepens whatever experience that the piece evokes in the audience: a loved one, better times in the past, hope for the future, the joy and pain of being alive, night, really anything that comes to mind.

The final aspect of Perrine’s definition that I would like to write about here is poetry’s nature of being condensed & concentrated, containing a higher “voltage” per word, as Perrine states. I’d argue that it’s similar for instrumental music. The piece is only 6 minutes long, and there are plenty of other emotion-provoking pieces out there with even shorter runtimes–3 minutes, 1 minute even. In this short runtime, the piece takes the listener on a journey–no, an adventure. It begins with a calm, bittersweet melody and texture. The nocturne is calm, and the night it represents is calm. Elements of tension begin brewing at 0:54; they bubble at 1:00 and boil at 1:07. The night is biting. But at 1:26, the night backs away. The tension releases, but not all the way. It begins to boil again. From then until 2:00, there is a mini-journey: tension rises and relaxes, and the listener doesn’t know where the piece will go. It boils, dissipates; boils, dissipates. Then, at 2:00, there is release. The main theme returns, and the night is calm again. In the span of just two minutes, Chopin and Pires have taken us on a journey of tension and release through this night, and the piece isn’t even halfway over yet. That’s high voltage. Chopin uses this journey to convey an experience of night–a specific kind of night, calm yet bitter–and perhaps deepen an experience that the audience has had themselves, as in the example with the widower.

I think that this piece, Chopin’s Nocturne Opus 27 No. 2, despite containing no words, is musical poetry.

Bonded or Love?

As Saeed and Nadia’s relationship progresses throughout the novel it makes me wonder if they were ever in love. When they start their relationship the two bond over commonalities, they share being fearful of what is to come in their country and Saeed’s mother dying. Although they are raised very differently they are still able to form connections and companionship with one another. As the two migrate and face trauma together it makes me wonder if their bond is remaining out of companionship for one and other when facing these difficult times or if they actually want to be together. In addition to this, the two are with each other all the time and perhaps grow indifferent to each other because of the lack of space they have from each other.

However, Saeed and Nadia do not agree on many topics based on their upbringing and regularly have small arguments about it. For example, in London Saeed wanted to live with people from their home while Nadia wanted to stay in their current living quarters; showing their fundamental differences. Was it their initial differences that ultimately separated them or their experiences together? Personally, I believe it was a combination of both.

Love or Circumstance?

I think the story between Nadia and Saeed is somewhat circumstantial. Their combined experiences with the militants and a looming war in their country were among the main factors that brought them together.

We can first get hints that this relationship is not going to last due to the fact that they are so different from each other, in prayer, clothing, and family life. While it does not always mean a less-than-optimal end to something, it can certainly be a kind of foreshadowing.

Nadia and Saeed have been together for a decent while, are somewhat intimate, and share the same kinds of trauma. So what didn’t work?

The truth is, these shared traumas and experiences could have been what drew them apart. After crossing through the door. There were so many more opportunities than where they were before. Many different ways to go. Their different lifestyles had the opportunity to become fully fledged. Free to pursue their own lives, without needing to rely on each other, despite their differences, to ensure their safety.

Why did I want Matthew and Maria to work?

On Friday in my English class, we finished the movie “Trust” by Hal Hartley. Throughout the entire movie, despite knowing their relationship should never work, I rooted for Matthew and Maria to end up happily together.

It’s hard not to cheer for Maria, we immediately see her going through a very hard time. Maria has dropped out of high school, been kicked out of her home, and ‘killed’ her father within the first 30 minutes of the movie. She’s young, the same age I am, yet she’s portrayed as very vulnerable, she hasn’t grasped some basic words yet, almost doll-like.

On the other hand, Matthew comes off as an angry adult, rough around the edges, and very smart but all-around a ‘bad boy.’ He has confidence and boldness that seems misplaced, almost like he’s using his intelligence to protect himself.

Their “romance” seems totally unrealistic and definitely shouldn’t work. A 17-year-old marrying an adult well out of his high school years is wrong in every sense. Even Maria’s mom sees it and tries to nudge Matthew toward her other daughter. At least they are both adults, even if Matthew isn’t quite there emotionally. However with Maria, they seem to give each other a purpose and push themselves to possibly become better, functioning citizens.

I couldn’t help but root for both Maria and Matthew individually. Even while knowing that their relationship is as shaky as the hand grenade they both carry around. Totally unpredictable, explosive, and always on the verge of falling apart.

 

 

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén