Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: TV

Malcolm In The Middle

Comedy based satire isn’t just used to commentate on societal norms. It can also be used to differentiate things everybody deals with regardless of the situation. In the case of modern comedy based satire, the TV series Malcolm In The Middle is another amazing example. Malcolm In The Middle is a single camera show centered around a dysfunctional middle class family, our protagonist being a child genius named Malcolm. This series had a very comedy based core, but at times used comedy based satire to speak on everyday family life and how just because something becomes normalized doesn’t make it okay. The chaos of a working class family where nobody has true control over any situation happening. Our protagonist Malcolm, despite being a genius, spends most of his time realizing that intelligence doesn’t actually solve the insane problems surrounding him. His habit of talking specifically to the audience allows him to act as both a partaker in the madness and as someone trying to analyze it from the outside. The tension caused by him attempting to and even sometimes fully understanding the chaos his family is in, and still not being able to escape it really helps the humor land.

A good portion of the show’s satire comes from our main family and how they interact with each other. Lois (the mother), is intense, stubborn, and almost terrifying when it comes to discipline, while Hal (the father) is emotional, impulsive, and often just as immature as their children. Their dynamic sets the tone for everybody else in the house, where rules exist, but they tend to get outright ignored. Malcolm, Reese, and Dewey are always switching between brotherly rivalries and teamwork depending on the amount of trouble they’ve gotten into, which can feel a little exaggerated at times but completely believable for siblings. The comedy grows naturally out of these relationships instead of your average joke, and that’s why the show still holds up to this day. In the end, the family never really becomes “normal,” and that’s exactly the point the show is attempting to make. While they are not perfect, and there are certainly faults within the family, they still love each other.

Raising Prejudice

I thought that the movie, Raising the Red Lantern was really interesting to watch. I thought that the characters all had very unique characteristics and everyone brought something to the story. I really think that it was important to have a more realistic point of view, of women in a society that do not have the option to make choices for their lives, compared to Elizabeth Bennet , who lived in a society, did not conform to social standards and still ended up in a secure marriage with a loving man. I think this is unrealistic and sets a false narrative of women in that kind of society.

Considering Pride and Prejudice and raising the red lantern together, Elizabeth Bennet was the picture of main character in her story. She grew up in a secure family, with every opportunity to learn things and conform to a society that knows the more realistic option for women is to end up with a man of good being and character. Despite her family needing someone to secure a marriage I order for her and her family to be able to keep their house after the passing of their father, she countiued to hold a prejudice and standard for the eligible men of her society. And in the end, she not only secured a marriage, she found love and a friend within her relationship. Her life at the end of the book ended happy. Even throughout the book, the narrative critized her best friend Charlotte, for securing a marriage with a man she had no love for. But she needed a marriage for herself, because she knew without it, she would soon be considered a spinster of her society. The difference between the two is one did nothing to secure a marriage and still needed up in a picture perfect one, and another wanted a proper marriage wherever she could find it.

Now considering Songlian’s life, she was educated, played the flute, and had some what of a mind of her own. But after  her father had passed away, and she was forced into an arranged marriage with a not so nice man, she was forced to conform to their teachings and ways of living. Her life became the exact opposite of perfect, because she had to change for her family. In the end it drove her mad. She realized that no matter what she did, or what steps she wanted to take for her life, that freedom would now be an impossible goal. this was represented through the last scene of the movie, when she walked back and fourth infant of her “house”.  She had no other ways to defend her character other than going mad inside her own head. In a way, this protected her and represented a fight back against the life she was forced to live. The only thing she had left from the person she was before, was the university uniform she came in. 

Comparing both Pride and Prejudice and Raising the Red Lantern, both have aspects of what it means to be a woman in a male powered society. Both women from the stories did not have many options for their own lives. even though Elizabeths life ended with her in love, she still and will always be less than a man, because of how their society worked. Songlian’s life ended in a tragedy because in the end she had nothing. Even though she gave up her life to support herself, she still ended with nothing. It goes to show that the choices we make in our life will not guarantee  a secure or happy life. Not conforming does not mean ones life will not be secure, and vice versus, but its what we do with what we control, that changes the future.

The Art of Modern Family

According to Aristotle, comedy shows the flaws and imperfections of ordinary people in a way that makes us laugh but also helps us understand human behavior. A great modern-day example of this is the TV show Modern Family. Even though the show is funny and sometimes exaggerated, it still reflects and shines a light on real situations that families have to deal with.

Modern Family follows the lives of three connected families and shows everyday problems like miscommunication, parenting struggles, and more. For example, characters like Phil Dunphy, the “main” dad, try really hard to be a good dad but often ends up embarrassing his kids in the process. The humor comes from his awkwardness and mistakes it it also shows how much he cares and what he’s willing to do for his family. This reflects Aristotle’s idea that comedy highlights human flaws in a way that feels more relatable than tragic.

The show also explores different family structures, like blended families and cultural differences through character like Gloria and Jay (a younger Colombian immigrant with a son and an older American man on his second marriage with two adult kids). Many of the conflicts start from misunderstandings or personality differences which is something that happens in real life, and by exaggerating these situations, the show makes them funny while still showing how families can work through problems/differences and support each other. Another family is a gay couple of men who have an adopted daughter from Vietnam. The dynamics and characters in this show promote diversity and represent many different types of people and relationships, and make audience members who may not usually relate with these demographics have common life experiences to laugh along and relate with.

Overall Modern Family shows that dramatic comedy can still be meaningful. While the show is meant to entertain, it also reveals truths about relationships, communication, and the imperfect nature of people, fitting Aristotle’s idea that comedy can help us better understand the human condition by laughing at our flaws.

More Than a Horse Laugh: How BoJack Horseman Uses Satire to Cut Deep.

BoJack Horseman at first glance seems like another animated comedy with talking animals but beneath the surface is a satire of contemporary culture. It uses humor to get into complex issues challenging viewers to confront uncomfortable truths. The show “light” or thing it does well is its ability to blend silly jokes with deep thoughts about the human condition, making it far more than just a simple cartoon.

The show successfully equips several satirical techniques. Irony is a repetitive one, such as BoJack Horseman, a sitcom star, dealing with depression. There is also the Juxtaposition of bright animation with dark story lines which adds on to the irony.  For example, the episode where BoJack Horseman delivers a eulogy at his mother’s funeral, is filled with dark ironic humor, as he struggles to connect with her even in death. Episode called “free churro.”

Hyperbole exaggerates Hollywood’s celebrity self absorption. Princess Carolyn’s nonstop drive and chaotic work life are hyperbolized to show the entertainment industry’s craziness. The show also uses understatement to highlight the disconnect between outward appearances and inner issues. BoJack Horseman often deflects serious issues with changing remarks, masking his deep pain. This is evident in his relationships, where he downplays his destructive behavior creating a sense of dark humor that underscores his emotional struggles.

BoJack Horseman’s satire goes beyond Hollywood, addressing societal issues. The show portrays mental illness, with BoJack Horseman dealing with depression a ND addiction with honesty. As well as how BoJack Horseman struggles are often dismissed and misunderstood. It also talks about past trauma which has shaped how the characters are now(Sarah Lynn). I find it so interesting how this show reflects how life is right now in the state of the world right now. The entertainment industry is depicted perfectly in this, especially how much people get exploited specifically at a young age.

The show suggests that change starts with acknowledging the social problems and committing to doing better striving for a more compassionate and understanding world.

Beyond the Cringe: Why “PEN15” is a Masterpiece of Dramatic Comedy.

On the surface, PEN15 seems like another cringe and comedy especially since two grown women are playing 13 year old surrounded by actual middle schoolers. But trust me, this show is so much more than that yes it will be an overload of awkwardness but Maya Erskine and Anna Konkle actually enhance the viewers understanding of adolescence, identity and the messy world of growing up.

What makes PEN15 so real is the show captures that awkwardness, insecurity and emotional intensity of middle school with accuracy. In the episode “First Day” Maya and Anna desperately attempt to fit in especially regarding their outfits. It’s so relatable because why did as children do we need other kids validation for? Although it is something that occurs during all stages of life it just makes me think why we truly need validation from other lame children. PEN15 is not afraid to show us cringe moments but it also doesn’t shy from genuineness in finding who you are.

Beyond the awkwardness PEN15 gets into deeper themes of identity and social dynamics. Maya’s Japanese-American heritage is a motif that shows up continuously. It highlights her struggle to connect with he cultural background while also trying to fit in. I remember the episode where there was another Japanese student who visited her family and all the students loved her and called her cute(her name is Ume). It was a “why does it look good on her but not me” moment that I know many people can resonate with. Maya tries to downplay the Japanese girl and even Anna when she what Ume said about Anna’s nose being big.

On the other hand, Anna’s exploration of her sexuality and her attempts to define herself outside of her parents’expectations resonates with anyone who felt like they do not belong. Lets not forget the social hierarchies of middle school, the friendships, rivalries, and cliques that can make or break your day.

I have 2 good scenes that I like, one was when Anna and Maya stole a thong from a girl in their grade and enjoyed sharing it because it brought more attention and confidence from guys. This plays into the dramatic comedy satire thing. The next is the scene when they go shopping with their moms. They get upset that they cant get something and begin to be rude to their mothers going as far as insulting and throwing a tantrum.

Overall PEN15 is not just a comedy, it is an insightful look at the challenges and success of growing up. It reminds us of the ways in which they shape our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. So if you have veer though it is just another cringe comedy, take a close look.

Family Guy Satire

In this episode of Family Guy, Joe reflects on how he became paralyzed from the waist down. His doctor calls his insurance company and explains to them that there’s a surgery that will restore his ability to walk which costs $200,000, meanwhile a wheelchair would cost $60. The doctor then hangs up the phone and tells Joe that they chose the latter, which resulted in Joe being paralyzed from the waist down forever.

Family Guy uses hyperbole to exaggerate how cold insurance companies are, and irony can be seen because health insurance companies are supposed to help people by covering hospital bills. Instead, they prevent Joe from getting better by refusing to help cover the cost of his surgery. Additionally, understatement is used here because the viewer can’t hear the insurance company talking on the phone, and the doctor casually hangs up and tells Joe that they chose the wheelchair.

This show isn’t just making a joke because, by exaggerating how blunt and cold the insurance company’s decision was, the show highlights how counter intuitive U.S. healthcare insurance is.

Satire in Ted

In the television show Ted, elements like humor and an inappropriate teddy bear are used to satirize suburban family life, specifically in the 1990s. The series follows a teenager, John Bennett, living with his talking teddy bear, Ted, whose childish and irresponsible behavior creates chaos that reveals deeper issues in the Bennett home. Through irony, like the fact that a teddy bear (with a deep, adult-male’s voice) which is typically meant to symbolize innocence behaves worse than any adult, and through hyperbole, like Ted’s exaggerated selfishness and immaturity, the series is able to expose the unrealistic expectations that are placed on kids compared to the low standards that society has for adults. The show, made in 2024, also parodies classic 90s sitcoms (that include and satirize themes like the trope of a magical best friend, “coming-of-age” stories, sentimental holiday specials, and more) by showing how messy and imperfect families really are behind the nostalgia, and by including a talking, walking teddy bear into a 90s-style sitcom, it almost feels like its poking fun at the overdone, unrealistic, and “perfect”-seeming sitcoms of the time. Also, understatement is used a lot in the show, with the family brushing off or acting like Ted’s outrageous behavior is normal. Their calm reactions to his shocking actions make the jokes funnier and prove a larger point that people often ignore problems instead of confronting them. Connecting the understatement technique back to the hyperbole; because Ted is portrayed as an adult [teddy bear…] he is disciplined less and allowed to get away with more things, showing that in society we let adults get off the hook easier, with John getting in trouble or even sometimes blamed for Ted’s actions in almost every episode. While on the surface Ted is very crude and funny, its satire critiques serious themes like toxic masculinity, denial within families, and the false belief that the past was simpler (rejecting the image/idealization of nostalgia), using humor to not only entertain and get a laugh out of the audience, but to highlight the flaws in American culture.

The Boys and Satire: Does Media Influence the Public

A strong real world example of contemporary satire is prominent in the TV show The Boys. This series is one of my personal favorites and takes place in a world much like our own. However, superheros are treated like celebrities and are controlled by a powerful corporation called Vought. In the public’s eye, these heroes seem noble, brave, and morally perfect, but behind the scenes many of them are selfish, corrupt, and dangerous. The show mainly follows a group of ordinary people trying to out these evil heroes and hold them accountable for wrongdoing.

The show provides several techniques of satire to present real world issues. One of the biggest is irony, since the people who are supposed to protect society are really the biggest threats to it. It also uses  hyperbole, exaggerating the idea of celebrity culture by turning superheros into massive brand with movies, merchandise, and political influence. The clear real world mockery supports the idea that celebrities are truly controlled by they’re higher ups and only serve the purpose to boost certain political, social, and economical agendas.

Beyond the making fun of superheroes, The Boys strongly criticizes real social issues. The show highlights how large corporations can prioritize profit over morality, how fame can shield people from consequences, and how the public can be easily influenced by marketing and media narratives. By exaggerating these ideas in a fictional show, it encourages viewers to take a step back and question if it is as far fetched as it seems. In this way the satire is not just for humor, but rather it pushes the audience to think more critically about real world media.

Us and Beloved

While reading Beloved, I couldn’t help but notice similarities between the novel and Jordan Peele’s horror film masterpiece, Us. Peele’s take on horror has been described as psychological, political, and comedic at just the right times. Also known for his directorial debut, Get Out, and his bizarre sci-fi escapade, Nope, Peele’s pieces of filmmaking demonstrate his incredible talent in making amazing stories come alive. 

Speaking of “coming alive,” the 2019 movie, Us, written and directed by Peele, symbolically delves into the complexities of relationships people have with themselves and others. The main character of the story, Adelaide, is just a girl when she encounters what she sees at first to be the mirror image of herself, before realizing that the reflection she sees is in fact her doppelgänger who is living in an underground, distorted version of Adelaide’s own life. As we learn more about the world the story takes place in, it becomes clear that the alternate Adelaide is full of jealousy and spite towards the girl living in the world above. There’s a big twist at the end of the movie, but I won’t give any spoilers. 

Where I noticed a connection to Toni Morrison’s Beloved and Peele’s Us is in the fact that both deal with issues of privilege, motherhood, and the presence of an ominous yet familiar figure who came from below the ground and wants to get revenge. In Us, the protagonist encounters her doppelgänger again as a wife and a mother of two. The doppelgänger proceeds to attack the family in an effort to take back what she once had, or what she longs to have again, in order to give her (also doppelgänger-ed) family the life she believes they deserve. This dynamic reminded me of that between Beloved and Sethe; in Beloved, the baby that Sethe killed comes back to life and completely disrupts the lives of her mother and sister as an act of vengeance for being murdered. Mothers also appear in both works and this role is what motivates both Adelaides to protect their children in any way possible. Privilege is the foundation of the entire conflict in the first place because the people who live aboveground are free to do what they please; they have access to sunlight and beaches and dance classes and vacations – whereas the people, the ‘Tethered,’ who live underground are forced to work under terrible conditions, only eat rabbits, and have no education. This discrepancy between the lives of the two groups mirrors, in my eyes, the experiences characters in Beloved share between their lives as enslaved people as as freed people, but also, and maybe more so, between White and Black people during the late 1800s.



TV: The Real Opium of the Masses

The Film Trust by Hal Hartley explores a number of odd motifs. From spilled milk, to deadpan dialogue, to a hand grenade, each one seems random. But one motif in particular stood out to me: television. 

At the beginning of the film, one of the main characters, Matthew, is an electronics repairman for a company that his father got him a job at. His boss wants him to work on TVs, but Matthew strongly does not like them and tells his boss that, “TV is the opium of the masses.” 

This statement comes from Karl Marx’s claim that “religion is the opium of the masses”, meaning that religion has been used by those in power to silence the masses and prevent them from seeking social or political change. Religion, according to Marx, is a form of escapism that prevents people from confronting difficult realities. It distorts reality and numbs the pain of oppression people face.  

The same can be true about television throughout Trust. 

Throughout the film, TV screens appear in places where characters are disconnected from each other. This is apparent in Maria’s house, as her sister and mother seem numb in front of the television, blankly staring at it. In her house, the television highlights their lack of agency about the world around them. In total, TV reflects a culture that is filled with advertising, entertainment, and consumerism. People watch false lives and feel a sense of false comfort in television, all whilst ignoring their real life problems. 

Does Your TV Need Fixing?

MY favorite days during the past couple of weeks have been our film Fridays. Being able to come to class and getting to watch a movie first thing is definitely a highlight of my morning. No, it’s not so I don’t have to think about a thesis for the current story we’re reading in class, but because watch movies gets my brain thinking in a different way. “Trust” is the movie we were watching.

I thought the movie was both strange and intriguing at the same time. I thought that certain moments in the movie felt too fast paced, or straight up weird. Like when Maria was staying at Matthews home for a night, and she completely trashed everything, or Matthews obsession with his hand grande. But after giving the movie a little more thought, I figured, perhaps these are the exact questions the writer wanted us, the watchers, to ask. the complexities of both characters keep the movie intriguing because we are always wondering what they will decide next in their lives. I enjoyed how we got to see two different people find the “beauty” of their life, even during difficult times. although the ending wasn’t the happiest, I think that was the point. It lets the watchers continue asking questions about what will happen to the characters after. this ties to one of the deeper meanings of the movie.  “some things shouldn’t be repaired”. Although they were talking about fixing TV’s. I believe it could also symbolize the characters. They walked with some guidance, with the help of each other, but it wasn’t enough to change them completely. I liked the ending because it shows, not everyone gets. happy ending just because they’re main characters. their life is complex, just like the real world, so its realistic for it to end like it did.

All in all, it goes to show that not everyone’s TV needs fixing. sometimes it’s better left broken, and unrepairable.

Existentialism and The Stranger in Modern Media

In The Stranger by Albert Camus, existentialism constantly shows up as a theme and idea. During the 20th century, existentialism gained popularity and criticism alike, and while not directly supporting or condemning it, The Stranger tells a story from the perspective of an existentialist. The Stranger became incredibly popular, and its influence and ideas can be seen in modern media today. For example, in the HBO Series, The Sopranos, AJ Soprano, the son of mob boss Tony Soprano, is assigned The Stranger in a school assignment. Throughout the next couple of episodes, AJ is seen echoing existentialist talking points. For example, when he is scolded for stealing his mom’s car with his friends, his mom remarks on how he could have killed them if he had gotten into an accident. He begins to talk about how that would have been interesting since it would reflect the absurdity and life and remarks on how death is a strong example of this absurdity. While in the show, these moments are mainly used in comedic fashion, these ideas come directly from existentialist works. The show deals with these same existential ideas more seriously when it consistently tackles the meaning of life and its absurdity through therapy sessions with the main character, Tony Soprano. Throughout the show, Tony frequently visits his therapist, Dr Melfi. In these sessions, Tony discloses his feelings of emptiness and anxiety despite continuing to gain wealth and power.  The show comments on his existential nature by showing that these social constructs do not provide him any real satisfaction, as he becomes more paranoid of his own fragile mortality.

AI Is Here!

Artificial Intelligence has been a well known and well talked about part of Computer Science ever since Alan Turing’s 1950 paper titled “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. Since then it has been used to describe everything from a stitched together group of if statements to Transformers with hundreds of billions of neurons (it should be mentioned that while these “neurons” are modeled after biological neurons, they function more similarly to mathematical operators and logic gates). Only recently, however, have we had AI that can pass as humans in their diction and prose. Does this mean that human writing will come to an end? No, at least not with current models.

Firstly, and most significantly, AI needs human data in order to function. Not only will it require more human writing to keep up with linguistic change and current events, it is also constantly in need of more training data. Current day AI companies have not been resorting to what is effectively theft of intellectual property for the fun of it. AI models with limited data are subject to a process known as overfitting, wherein an AI model becomes familiar enough with training data that it can simply memorize how to analyze everything and get a higher score than if it learned how to solve each problem. Due to how fast AI models have to evolve, they are in constant need of new data, meaning new human writing. Couple this with other problems such as generational loss and AI is dependent on human writing.

To add on to that, AI is wrong, constantly. Current AI models aim first and foremost to make grammatically correct, coherent sentences. Anything else, such as the truth, is secondary. AI “hallucinations” are a well documented phenomenon which is incredibly difficult to fix. While AI is getting better and better and finding reliable sources and tools are being made to fix this, it is still a large problem. This all goes without mentioning temperature. Temperature, when referring to LLMs, is a parameter that effectively determines how random the AI chooses to be. AI with high temperature will generate more interesting and varied sentences than an AI with low temperature. It should go without saying that a high temperature also introduces a chance for the AI to say something wrong. Many current AI models use high temperatures as people want sentences that sound more human and even a little random which means that these errors are also likely to stay for a while.

There are of course, many other reasons that human writing is preferable to AI, most notably the energy cost. AI takes around a bottle of water to generate a 100 word prompt whereas I managed to write this 500 word post while only drinking half a water bottle. This also isn’t to say that there is nothing to worry about and soon AI will be going the way of the dinosaurs. For now, however, it is likely that human writing will still be preferable to AI writing for everyone but the writer.

How Raise the Red Lantern Traps Songlian

At the beggining of the movie, Songlian believes that women will be forced to be objects and have no choice. Songlian says “Let me be a concubine. Isn’t that a woman’s fate?” Her mother has been pressuring her into marriage and she feels like she needs to marry a rich man in order to live as a woman. And once Songlian arrives at the manor, these views are solidified by the servant not letting her help with the laundry and the other servants upholding traditions.

Once Songlian gets to the master’s house, it never shows the outside world. Every camera angle depicts the characters as being confined in the house and any shot that shows the entire area blurs anything outside of the house. by only showing the house, the camera shows that the manor is the only thing that matters to the mistresses and traps them into superficial conflict with each other. Songlian is forced into family traditions which trap her in a routine that manipulates her into fighting with the other mistresses. By seperating the movie into seasons the movie depicts the endless cycle of living in the house. Visuals like blowing out the lanterns and sounds like the foot massage are repeated in order to highlight how the mistresses are trapped by the cycle.

Finally, in the end of the movie Songlian realizes that she is a human being and she has power. Witnessing Meishan’s death mentally frees Songlian and she realizes how evil the system that she is stuck in is. When Songlian gets revenge for Meishan’s death, she is bathed in the red light that trapped her for the entire movie but she is no longer obeying the system. Songlian returns to her university uniform because she realizes that she is an educated human. However, despite being mentally freed, Songlian is still trapped. Songlian has nowhere to go and can only go mad and wander back and forth. While the credits play, Songlian is trapped in a frame within a frame by buildings around her and she is surrounded by the red lanterns that trapped her before. Songlian is no longer adhering to tradition but she is replaced by another mistress and the system continues to work while she wanders aimlessly.

Thoughts and Prayers: How Bojack Horseman Satirizes Gun Violence

At first glance, Bojack Horseman might seem like just another absurd adult animation. But under the talking animals and celebrity satire, the show delivers profound critiques of modern society, tackling themes of mental health, toxic celebrity culture, and the way the media handles political issues. Created by Raphael Bob-Waksberg, the show follows the life of BoJack Horseman, a washed-up sitcom actor from the ’90s struggling with addiction, depression, and his inability to escape the toxic cycles of his past.

One episode in particular strikes me as a true work of satire: “Thoughts and Prayers” (Season 4, Episode 5), tackles America’s ineffective response to gun violence. The episode satirizes the way politicians, Hollywood executives, and the media treat mass shootings as PR problems rather than human tragedies.

The episode uses irony to expose the hollowness of “thoughts and prayers.” A phrase repeated by Princess Carolyn, a Hollywood agent, and her as she works on promoting an upcoming action film, Ms. Taken, starring Courtney Portnoy.

Instead of advocating for policy change, Hollywood executives and politicians repeat this phrase as a meaningless PR move, mirroring how real-world leaders offer sympathy while refusing to take action. This irony highlights the disconnect between public outrage and actual reform, forcing viewers to question whether these gestures are genuine or just a tool to quiet the public.

The absurd escalation of events, when the government finally bans guns only after women start carrying them, exaggerates how political decisions are often based on power dynamics rather than public safety. The same politicians who ignored mass shootings for years suddenly panic when their sense of power is disrupted. This extreme reversal of roles forces the viewer to confront the underlying biases in gun legislation, especially how laws are shaped not by morality but by who holds power.

This episode also uses parody to mock the media’s performative coverage of gun violence. News outlets treat mass shootings as just another trending cycle, and Hollywood executives scramble not to address the issue but to spin it in a way that keeps their profits. Their decision to rebrand Ms. Taken as a feminist empowerment film is a direct satire of how corporations exploit social issues for financial gain rather than advocating for a real change.

Understatement and situational irony are used for a comedic effect when the government’s reaction to the mass shootings is suddenly outraged when a woman is the cause of the tragedy, and men begin to feel personally threatened. After years of inaction, congressmen now argue for gun control, but only because women are armed, making them uncomfortable.

“What are my constituents supposed to do, NOT compliment random women on the street because they might be carrying a gun? We cannot allow our lives to be dictated by that kind of fear!”

This moment perfectly encapsulates the hypocrisy of gun politics, showing how lawmakers prioritize preserving male dominance over genuine public safety. “Bojack Horseman” isn’t just making fun of politicians; it’s criticizing the societal cycle of inaction. The episode forces viewers to recognize how mass shootings have become normalized and how real change only happens when those in power feel threatened.

Diane’s final line,

I can’t believe this country hates women more than it loves guns.

serves as a devastating critique of how deeply ingrained bias shapes policy more than logic ever does. The satire isn’t just exposing the American government’s hypocrisy, it’s compelling viewers to ask why we accept this reality and whether we’re willing to demand actual change.

Satire in “Get Out”

Get Out is a satirical comedy horror released in 2017 by Jordan Peele. The film follows Chris, a black man, as he travels with his long-term white girlfriend Rose, for a weekend getaway to meet her parents. Initially, Chris feels uneasy around the family because they may not like him because he is Black, however the threat quickly changes when he learns that their weirdly micro aggressive behavior is because the family transplants white brains into black bodies while the consciousness of the host remains in the “sunken place.” The movie ends with a severely injured Chris narrowly escaping Rose and her family while simultaneously destroying the Armitage’s property.

Get Out uses many forms of satire throughout the film to explore the exploitation of black bodies by white elites and different forms of racism, however I found that irony and hyperbole to be the most impactful and reoccurring.

There are many micro aggressive lines within Get Out that are subtle in nature, but numerous enough so that the audience is forced to take note of it and understand what the character is experiencing. An example of this is during the drive down to the Armitage’s property,  Chris questions if Rose’s family is aware that he black. In an effort to comfort him, Rose says,

Baby, it’s fine. My dad would legit vote for Obama a third time he could. Yes, he will want to talk to you about it, and that will be embarrassing, but they’re gonna love you. I promise.

Here, we see a demonstration of verbal irony as Rose’s words are suppose to reassure Chris and the audience that her family is not racist because “they voted for a black man” however this line does the exact opposite as it as a generalization of Black people and lacks actual depth. Additionally, during a family dinner Chris and Rose’s brother discuss the MMA and her brother asks if Chris was ever interested in fighting. Chris denies it claiming he is a “lover not a fighter.” Rose’s brother response exemplifies the micro aggressive tone of the film as he says,

Cause, with your frame, your genetic make-up? If you pushed your body, I mean really trained, you’d be a beast.

Here, her brother reduces Chris to the stereotypical belief that black people are inherently stronger and athletic than white people because of genetics. Even though this can be seen as a “good” notion, a stereotype is a stereotype. Lines such as these are verbally ironic in nature because they masked as compliments seeking to comfort and reaffirm Black people, however they do the exact opposite as they are generalizing and reduce them to particular characteristics and people.

The other form of satire throughout the film was hyperbole. The entire premise of Get Out is hyperbolic in nature because the idea that elite whites can “buy” black bodies to inhabit as their own is an over exaggeration and similar in nature to American chattel slavery. After going to the “sunken place”, Blacks are forced to be passengers in their own bodies. This is metaphorically similar to slavery as black people did not have any sense of autonomy or ownership over their bodies.

One of the most important uses of satire in the film seemed to happen at the end of it. After escaping the property, Chris is faced with a psychotic Rose seeking to kill him. The fight ends with Chris on top of her while choking her, however he is unable to bring himself to kill her. Just as this is happening a police car pulls up. Before the audience and Chris know it’s his friend, there is a feeling of dread and uneasiness as everyone knows what will happen next. I think this moment perfectly encapsulates what it feels like to be a Black person in America as the police should bring a sense of security and relief, while in reality it brought the exact opposite.

Overall, Peele is able to really criticize and illuminate how black bodies are being exploited in present America and explore what it really means to be Black in different spaces. I really appreciate how he puts the audience in Chris’ shoes and instead of telling them how they should feel he shows it.

Satire of Jobs in Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared

Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared is a TV show where three character, Yellow Guy, Red Guy, and Duck; learn about educational topics from different characters. The show is presented like a kids show but takes dark and disturbing turns in order to satirize the topics that the characters are learning about. In the first episode, the three main characters learn about jobs from a talking briefcase before being dropped into a factory producing bits and parts.

Yellow Guy goes to a conveyor belt, makes a part, and is told “good job teammate” by one of the workers. This is then contrasted with Duck failing to make a part and his work being grinded into dust. After his work is destroyed, Duck says “hey, my thing that I did.” The show parodies how jobs treat their workers by rewarding Yellow Guy for successfully making a part and then destroying the thing that Duck made. Duck is proud of what he made but it is destroyed because it’s not what the company wants. Duck’s work being destroyed shows how companies don’t care about people and only value employees based on their worth to the company.

Meanwhile, Red Guy answers a phone and is told that he is upper management despite having no qualifications. While the other characters eat lunch from a vending machine, Red Guy is given a salmon with diamonds. The hyperbole of Red Guy getting a salmon with real diamonds shows how much unnecessary wealth higher ups in companies have. And, when Red Guy asks if you can eat diamonds, his assistant says that they’ll get something else and throws the food on the floor. The show employs situational irony by subverting what the audience thinks will happen with the food in order to further the idea that higher ups have more wealth than they need. While the other characters can only afford lunch from a vending machine, Red Guy gets extravagant food which is thrown away if he doesn’t like it.

Then, Duck watches a video which parodies training videos used by companies. In the video, it says “health and safety is important to us in our own special way.” Instead of claiming that the company will prevent accidents from happening like the audience expects, the video says that “at some point, we will have an accident. And that’s a promise. Because we feel that only a freak accident helps us appreciate all the times we’re not being burned in a grease fire or mangled in a piece of machinery.” In the video, situational irony is used to show that companies don’t actually care about their employees safety.

And after working at the factory, the briefcase comes back and throws the characters a coin which stabs Duck’s eye. Again, situational irony is used to show that after doing all their work, the thing that is meant to be a reward only hurts them.

My Family’s Favorite Rick and Morty Episode – A Satire Tackling Mental Health Crisis, The Follies of Capitalism, and Ethical Consumption

When my father, younger sibling, and I turned on Risk and Morty to watch together on a Friday night, we were surprised by the suicide and mental health warning at the beginning of the episode. Yet, by the end of the episode, we all knew that out of 7 seasons we’ve watched, this was our favorite episode.

“That’s Amorte”, Season 7, Episode 4 of Rick and Morty begins with the family scarfing down their favorite meal, spaghetti. But when Rick goes to get more spaghetti, Morty walks in on him scooping it out of a dead person in his lab.

WHY IS IT ALWAYS THIS SHIT WITH YOU

– Morty (Rick and Morty)

Rick reveals that his famous spaghetti is made on another planet. A planet in which when people kill themselves, they turn into delicious suicide spaghetti. Morty (in a bout of frustration) admits to the people of this planet that most creatures in the universe would consider the insides of their suicide victims to be tasty. The planet rushes to allow assisted suicides for all those who may need it to sell the “suicide spaghetti” to all the other local planets.

Soon, the leader of the suicide spaghetti planet begins to take greater measures, installing a fluorescent light to replace the sun, destroying cities, and making everyone’s life as miserable as possible, all to increase spaghetti production, claiming that “Our economy has never been better”.

Now later in this episode, Rick and Morty work to develop a solution to the suicide spaghetti problem, with wars breaking out, abominations of nature being created, and it all ending with the CEO of Lego saving the world. However, the concept is all that is needed for the focus of this blog post.

This episode plays on very dark concepts, those that the people in my family have had to face head-on. But through all the jokes a point is made.

Capitalism in the United States has created a world in which people are often seen as products instead of humans. They are worth nothing more than what they can produce. In this episode, the writers use hyperbole to express that treating people as products leads to mental health crisis and that leaders continue to ignore the needs of the people, as long as profits are staying up.

In this episode, the writers throw the consequences of greedy Capitalism right in your face. Creating a parody of the current state of the economy, dramatized for comedic effect.

My personal favorite touch of the episode is the fluorescent white used in replacement of the sun. Not only does this play on the fluorescent lights used in schools and offices which make people miserable, but it also makes a point to be something that also impacts the leader of the suicide spaghetti planet. That is to say, in an effort to make everyone’s lives worse for profit, the leader of this planet is also making their day-to-day life worse. What was once a leader of a thriving society becomes a money-hungry monster, indirectly killing people for profit.

Despite the hyperbole, it’s important to acknowledge the similarities to reality. How many people have died from lung cancer after mining coal for a businessman all their life? How many people have put their mental and physical health at risk to get in more hours at work? How many people have died from starvation and lack of drinking water while leaders sit in their hot tubs with a charcuterie board?

The reason why Rick and Morty is the only show my whole family can agree to watch (excluding squid game) is because while my younger sibling may enjoy the crass humor, my dad can enjoy the commentary made on society. 

Monsters

How does society get to determine who is a monster and who isn’t?

The question stuck with me as I finished The Stranger, and when I watched the Netflix series Monsters last weekend, where I could not help but notice some similarities between the two stories.

Ryan Murphy, director of the controversial series, clearly wanted to portray the Menendez brothers, famous for killing both of their parents in the 90’s, in a rather dark manner. Although the brothers were certainly guilty of hiding such brutal murders, it is easy to see through the real tapes from their trials that both Erik and Lyle Menendez’s actions stemmed from a lifetime of physical, emotional and sexual abuse from their parents. However, the majority of the world has always viewed them as the title of Murphy’s series indicates: Monsters.

It’s interesting that I watched this series at the same time we were reading The Stranger, for a quote in the book that particularly jumped out at me to mirror the Menendez story was when Meursault says, “the judge concluded I was a monster and that he was primed to use the death penalty on me. There was no place in society for people like me”.

This made me feel deeply for Meursault, and the Menendez brothers, and anyone else who has ever felt let down by the law, by society or by the systems of oppression in our world that constantly push against them. In class, people have asked, “was Meursault a psychopath? Sociopath? What is wrong with him that could possibly make him such a brutal individual?” and for that I have no answer. But I still find myself pitying him. I ask myself why Meursault does not get to be viewed as a human, and why we must always resort to diminishing people like him and the Menendez brothers to be “Monsters” so quickly? Why do some equally guilty people get to walk the planet free when the Menendez’s are imprisoned separately for life? Why do those lives get to hold more value than theirs?

I promise I’m not trying to excuse Meursault’s behavior, nor the Menendez’s murder, but I figure that if people are always so quick to villain-ize other people, especially men for that matter, the way they tended to be in terms of these cases, society itself might just completely implode. And I believe humans need to have more capacity for empathy than that.

The Stranger & the Seinfeld Finale

As I was reading the second half of The Stranger, the court case reminded me a lot of the final episode of Seinfeld. Meursault’s case in The Stranger was based heavily off his character, in fact there was barely any actual discussion of his crime. The prosecution brought in nearly every character Meursault introduced us to during the novel. They all gave testimonies that were mainly about his behaviors, habit, personality, and general disposition. The case resulted in Meursault being put to death.

Seinfeld‘s “The Finale” pays a direct homage to Camus in the way they finished the television show. In “The Finale” the four main characters, Jerry, George, Kramer, and Elaine, are caught making fun of a person being robbed at gun point. They are charged the newly instated “good Samaritan law” that allows bystanders to be prosecuted if they decide not to help a person in potential harm. They are taken to court, and just like Meursault, the prosecution brings lots of witnesses. Nearly every side character from all nine seasons of Seinfeld are brought to testify against them. Everyone tells their story and how the main characters have wronged them. The judge comes to the verdict that they are terrible people and gives them a year of prison.

I was always a fan of the way Seinfeld ended despite controversy from the fan base. As I watched it for the first time and as I re watched it I always enjoyed seeing characters I forgot about. It was definitely on a smaller scale in The Stranger, but I still enjoyed it in a similar way.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén