Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: Modernism

WOW Zendaya “ALL FOR US” + Emily Dickinson “THERE’S BEEN A DEATH AT THE OPPOSITE HOUSE”

There is a particular kind of narrative voice that chills and captivates simultaneously. The observer who watches events unfold not with surprise but with the quiet almost predetermined knowledge of the ending. This perspective is both captured in Labyrinth and Zendaya’s song “ALL FOR US” in the album Imagination & the Misfit Kid and Emily Dickinson’s poem “There’s been a Death in the Opposite House.” Both pieces place us in the shoes of speakers who witness heavy moments in their commentary especially with an awareness of inevitability.

 

In “All For Us” , the speaker, through a depressing tone, narrates the lives of people in a cycle of internal and external destruction. The lyrics paint a picture of the speaker being all knowing and telling of a consumed path laid out with certainty. The speaker observes the choices being made, the external pressures and the internal struggles all while maintaining her stance of suggesting this outcome was observed and even unavoidable.  There’s a sense of watching a play where the Final Act is already written in the observer is merely recounting the unfolding tragedy. This experience of witnessing such a descent can be both broadening and depending. Broadening by exposing them to the complexities of human vulnerability and external forces that can shape a life. Deepening by fostering empathy for those caught in such struggles promoting contemplation on one’s own choices and resilience.

 

Similarly Dickinson’s poem presents an observer on the opposite side of the house where a death has occurred.  The speaker nonchalantly details the proceedings occurring after the death. It states “I know it, by the numb look such houses have”(3-4) and through the poem stating things that would happen as if he knows such as “A Window opens like a Pod – Abrupts- mechanically”(7-8) but he talks almost detachment there’s no shock or raw emotion in the telling instead there’s a calm recitation of events the recognition of the familiar ritual surrounding death.  The Observer notes the way the world seems to pause(all attention goes to the house) all with an understanding that this is simply how such an event is marked. The poem implies a universal understanding of dead survival and its immutable nature. 

 

Both pieces capture a distinctly romantic spirit and poetic appreciation of experiences in the wonder of existence. Dickinson’s poem with its dark imagery and precise ceremonial detailing of grief creates the intense characteristic of romantic poetry. The focus on the inner experience of observation and the stillness that follows a significant event aligns with the Romantic fascination. Labrith’s song too taps into its exploration of overwhelming emotional setting and the sense of inescapable destiny. .

For poetic language, “All for us”, “All for love” is repetition. The constant repetition of those words is like unity and shared experiences/responsibility. Each of the things she mentioned in something someone is struggling with in life therefore it makes sense for there to be an understanding. It also builds emotional intensity. It is also in its way memorable because of how many times it is repeated. 

 

There is a metaphor in the lyric “No food in the kitchen(famine, Famine)” and it is a powerful one. They aren’t literally experiencing famine like in history books but the feeling of extreme, lack of starvation and desperation is so intense that famine is used to describe the situation. 

The mention of “Micheal Corleone” is an allusion to the character from “The Godfather.” Micheal Corleone is known for being a protector and provider for his family, often through drastic means. SO saying “Better be a man(Micheal Corleone)” implies the need to step up, be strong, and take care of things, just like the character. 

Both “ALL OF US” and “There’s been a Death in the Opposite House” use a narrative voice that feels both intimate and distant. The speakers are deeply absorbed in the scene yet detached from the emotional aspects making the story feel faded. They are the witnesses who see the final curtain fall.

The Boys and Satire: Does Media Influence the Public

A strong real world example of contemporary satire is prominent in the TV show The Boys. This series is one of my personal favorites and takes place in a world much like our own. However, superheros are treated like celebrities and are controlled by a powerful corporation called Vought. In the public’s eye, these heroes seem noble, brave, and morally perfect, but behind the scenes many of them are selfish, corrupt, and dangerous. The show mainly follows a group of ordinary people trying to out these evil heroes and hold them accountable for wrongdoing.

The show provides several techniques of satire to present real world issues. One of the biggest is irony, since the people who are supposed to protect society are really the biggest threats to it. It also uses  hyperbole, exaggerating the idea of celebrity culture by turning superheros into massive brand with movies, merchandise, and political influence. The clear real world mockery supports the idea that celebrities are truly controlled by they’re higher ups and only serve the purpose to boost certain political, social, and economical agendas.

Beyond the making fun of superheroes, The Boys strongly criticizes real social issues. The show highlights how large corporations can prioritize profit over morality, how fame can shield people from consequences, and how the public can be easily influenced by marketing and media narratives. By exaggerating these ideas in a fictional show, it encourages viewers to take a step back and question if it is as far fetched as it seems. In this way the satire is not just for humor, but rather it pushes the audience to think more critically about real world media.

Seigfried and Conformity

Seigfried” is the fifteenth song on Frank Ocean’s second studio album, Blonde. The relaxed song incorporates modern, poetic lines of raw emotion, longing, and isolation. While the song does have a few lines that seem to be about someone Frank longs for romantically, I’d argue that the song is more about his feeling of disconnect from others and a being pushed by society into a life that doesn’t feel like his.

I can’t relate to my peers

I’d rather live outside

I’d rather chip my pride than lose my mind out here

Maybe I’m a fool

Frank starts out confident in his societal defiance, expressing his desires and his disinterest in how others live their lives. These lines express his isolation in not being able to “relate to [his] peers”, and how he rejects their ways of living and expectations of how others live. Him saying he’d “rather chip [his pride] than lose his mind” uses the metaphor of pride being chipped to show how he feels so strongly against societal expectations that he doesn’t care how other see him, as long as he feels authentic. He seems almost content with his ‘strangeness’ in the first few lines, but then, he contrasts that feeling by expressing: “Maybe I’m a fool”; a moment of doubt or reconsideration, as though his commitment to his differences may backfire.

Directly after this, he sings:

Maybe I should move and settle

Two kids and a swimming pool

I’m not brave

This continues his tone switch to being doubtful, and these lines convey a ‘normal’, ‘average’, and expected lifestyle society has of people: a nuclear family in presumably a nice suburb. His statement: “I’m not brave” explains the previous few lines, he is stating how even though he doesn’t fit in to society and craves living a lifestyle that makes him truly happy, he’s not “brave” enough to do so, and so he seriously considers conforming. Also, his “I’m not brave” contrasts strongly with the earlier “I’d rather chip my pride than lose my mind out here”, which mirrors a person who relates to Frank’s circling thoughts, fears, and emotions about being authentic to themselves.

Been living in an idea

An idea from another man’s mind

This is not my life

It’s just a fond farewell to a friend

It’s just a fond farewell to a friend

These lines continue his distaste with the societally forced life he’s living, and his metaphor of “living in an idea from another man’s mind” shows his feelings of confinement and uncomfortability in his life. The repetition of “It’s just a fond farewell to a friend” reinforce how strongly he feels towards this line, which I interpret as the “friend” being the past, real and authentic version of himself. He is going to miss his authentic self, and wishes he could be him, or be with him, forever, but as earlier stated, “[He’s] not brave” enough to do so.

Less morose and more present

Dwell on my gifts for a second

A moment one solar flare would consume, so why not

Spin this flammable paper on the film that’s my life

High flights, inhale the vapor, exhale once and think twice

Eat some shrooms, maybe have a good cry, about you

Finally, near the end of the song, these lines are spoken, almost poetically, but with a little rhythm, by Frank. “Less morose and more present” are two contrasting ideas, maybe a phrase or idea people have said to him, morose meaning gloominess or uncommunicative-ness, which he likely feels as a result of being forced into this life which isn’t his, and more present, as in living in and embracing daily life, which would be hard for him. “Dwell on my gifts” is a paradoxical statement; dwell is usually used in regards to a sad or traumatic experience, but in this case Frank is referring to his “gifts”, which, again, could be something people have said to him; something like he has so much to be grateful for, but after all, he’s really not happy with the life he’s living. This leads to, and is followed in the song by him doing drugs, spinning his (rolling?) paper on the metaphoric “film that’s [his life]”, which expresses his reflecting and coping with his depressing life, and then eating “some shrooms” and crying about an unspecified person, maybe a love interest, or maybe the “friend” earlier stated, which represents his true self. He expresses ideas of existentialism with his line “A moment one solar flare would consume”, when referring to thinking about the things he’s grateful for; he believes everything is pointless and will end, that everything would be destroyed and gone in one moment from a singular solar explosion, so what’s the point of living in the present, and having “less morose”? The song as a whole seems to reenact the lives of people who don’t fit into society, at first embracing their differences, but then conforming into the life expected of them, with many consequences like depression, existentialism, and sometimes even turning to things like drugs to cope with their unhappiness.

Even the song name, “Seigfried”, holds a lot of significance in this song. Siegfried, a German mythological hero, was known for being brave, which contrasts Frank’s “I’m not brave”. But also, Siegfried Sassoon, a British war poet, wrote about his experiences in World War I (another time you had to be brave), and this poet was known for his homosexual and heterosexual relationships, similar to Frank.

I’d do anything for you

(In the dark)

This supports the idea of the song also being about someone Frank loves, but that it has to be “In the dark”, because if he is singing the song about and loving a man, society wouldn’t agree, and he’s not brave enough to do “anything for [him]” in ‘the light’. The mythological Siegfried was a true brave hero, maybe something Frank longs to be, and the war poet was a traumatized soldier who coped by writing poetry about his societally unaccepted (especially at that time) relationships, someone very similar to who Frank really is.

Nature and Nostalgia

The song “In the Aeroplane Over the Sea” by Neutral Milk Hotel and section 6 of “Song of Myself” have a lot in common, including the poem’s imagery, themes, and overall mood.

In terms of imagery, it is very evident that these two things are very similar. The poem focuses on a lot of imagery to establish a setting and specific mood for the poem and the audience. While this song focuses on using the imagery to establish an atmosphere, while also gives the audience a feeling of being with the author in that very moment. The lyric in the song, “There is music that sounds from the street/There are lights in the clouds.” This is taking control of many of the five senses the audience has, and invites them to look deeper into the poem, and uses itself as a passage to that very meaning.

The themes of the poem are also very similar between the pieces. The idea of death is a recurring theme and is mentioned throughout each piece of media. It is more obvious within the first stanza of this song, and is not exactly stated during Song of Myself, but is heavily referenced and insinuated. The song is mainly about memory, and looking back on a better time in the author’s life. Specifically,y a love interest named Anna. While Whitman takes a look and dives into death as a whole, and rebirth through nature, this song focuses on experiences, and compares her appearance to that of a beautiful landscape.

Lastly, the mood of the poem compared to the song is way different. The poem is bleak, but also hopeful. It celebrates life while also acknowledging death. This song, while celebrating life, takes a hard look at nostalgia and memories. These differences look at many different approaches to death and loss, and make them more similar than they are different.

 

SNL and the Fragility of Democracy

A few weeks ago, I watched the Founding Fathers Cold Open on Saturday Night Live. On my first watch, I thought that this was hilarious and I was cracking up throughout the skit however, when my AP Lit teacher asked my classmates and I to analyze a modern piece of satire, I decided to revisit this particular skit and I found it to be kind of scary.

The skit begins with the “founding fathers” signing the Declaration of Independence. “John Hancock” then asks “Alexander Hamilton” to share his opinions on their new nation to which Lin Manuel Miranda comes out and begins to rap about what he hopes for in this new country. Within his first few lines, “Hamilton” is interrupted by “Donald Trump” and the remainder of the skit is “Trump” discussing the future that he envisions for the country.

Throughout the skit, many satirical techniques are employed however, here I will only name a few.

During the skit, the actor that played Trump consistently used youthful slang such as “zesty”, “take the L”, and “in my ___ era”. This is incredibly ironic because both the current president (Trump) and the most recent president (Biden)  were the oldest presidents in the History of the United States. By creating this binary between young and old, SNL is showing how ridiculous it is that for people so close to the end of their lives to take on the kind of responsibility of running a country just as it would be crazy for a tween or a teenager to run the U.S.

The fact that SNL made this skit about Trump’s first week back in office a parody to the signing of the Declaration of Independence is another example of satire. Some of the things mentioned were either a step back from the progress that society has made with equality since the signing of the Declaration of Independence or it was something that the founding fathers were trying to avoid in their new country such as having a king (the skit implied that Trump may one day take on a role similar to that of a king).

Finally, SNL used both hyperbole and understatement  in creation of this skit. When “Trump” first interrupts Miranda, he says that he is in his “king era”. This can be viewed as a hyperbole as while President Trump is currently using a lot of power, it is unlikely that he will adopt a role similar to a king. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the writers of this skit used understatement to illustrate the unhappiness of the American people after his first week in office. To show this, near the end of the skit when “Trump” is talking about the all time high of the price of eggs he exclaims, “Who would have thought it’d be easier to get a ceasefire in Gaza then bring down the price of eggs?”

While the goal of SNL is mainly comedy, most of their skits also provide a commentary on some aspect of society. In this particular instance, they bring to light how worrisome this bombardment of executive orders was and how the United States may continue to change in a way that many do not believe to be positive in the coming years. SNL is trying to make light of a situation that they believe to be potentially dangerous but they are also cluing in society for what is to come.

Why don’t we talk about sex from the female perspective?

In my AP Lit class, we have been asked to discuss the sexual encounters in Beloved. We talk about all of the different events that have occurred, but I fear that we are missing one of Morrison’s key points.

Throughout the novel so far, from the sweet home men and the cows all the way to when Paul D temporarily lost attraction to Sethe after sleeping with her for the first time, each sexual encounter places a focus on the male desire (with the exception of Sethe and Halle in the corn field, however, I would argue that that does not place the focus on desire but on the feelings of freedom and the protection that the other sweet home men provided them). The female desire is not taken into account until Beloved goes to find Paul D in the shed.

In the book, Beloved is originally portrayed as a creepy and almost antagonistic character and later in the novel we find out that not only is she a strange person but she also happens to be the ghost that has been wreaking chaos in 124.

I have no idea why Morrison made this choice in the novel. I do not know if this is a continuation of the story of 1873 or if it is a commentary of how sex is perceived in modern day society but I know that Morrison made a conscious choice in giving the female perspective of sex almost solely to the only antagonistic, creepy, and destructive woman in the novel.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén