Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Date: February 27, 2025

Satire of Jobs in Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared

Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared is a TV show where three character, Yellow Guy, Red Guy, and Duck; learn about educational topics from different characters. The show is presented like a kids show but takes dark and disturbing turns in order to satirize the topics that the characters are learning about. In the first episode, the three main characters learn about jobs from a talking briefcase before being dropped into a factory producing bits and parts.

Yellow Guy goes to a conveyor belt, makes a part, and is told “good job teammate” by one of the workers. This is then contrasted with Duck failing to make a part and his work being grinded into dust. After his work is destroyed, Duck says “hey, my thing that I did.” The show parodies how jobs treat their workers by rewarding Yellow Guy for successfully making a part and then destroying the thing that Duck made. Duck is proud of what he made but it is destroyed because it’s not what the company wants. Duck’s work being destroyed shows how companies don’t care about people and only value employees based on their worth to the company.

Meanwhile, Red Guy answers a phone and is told that he is upper management despite having no qualifications. While the other characters eat lunch from a vending machine, Red Guy is given a salmon with diamonds. The hyperbole of Red Guy getting a salmon with real diamonds shows how much unnecessary wealth higher ups in companies have. And, when Red Guy asks if you can eat diamonds, his assistant says that they’ll get something else and throws the food on the floor. The show employs situational irony by subverting what the audience thinks will happen with the food in order to further the idea that higher ups have more wealth than they need. While the other characters can only afford lunch from a vending machine, Red Guy gets extravagant food which is thrown away if he doesn’t like it.

Then, Duck watches a video which parodies training videos used by companies. In the video, it says “health and safety is important to us in our own special way.” Instead of claiming that the company will prevent accidents from happening like the audience expects, the video says that “at some point, we will have an accident. And that’s a promise. Because we feel that only a freak accident helps us appreciate all the times we’re not being burned in a grease fire or mangled in a piece of machinery.” In the video, situational irony is used to show that companies don’t actually care about their employees safety.

And after working at the factory, the briefcase comes back and throws the characters a coin which stabs Duck’s eye. Again, situational irony is used to show that after doing all their work, the thing that is meant to be a reward only hurts them.

Zoolander: What Every Satire Should Aspire to Be

Zoolander (2001) was released in order to bring attention to the world of fashion and modeling and how outrageous the standards of both industries are, as well as how each can affect individuals mentally and physically by addressing issues such as anorexia, social anxiety, and education. It is a terribly funny movie and one of my all-time favorites.

The movie, set in New York City, follows Derek Zoolander, a crazy popular male model on the front of seemingly every fashion magazine and billboard there is. In its opening scenes, Derek is doing an interview detailing how popular and confident but also how self-centered and ignorant he is. He then goes on to attend the Fashion “Grammy’s” after the interview, and he gets his male model of the year streak broken by a new, risque model named Hansel.

Heartbroken, Derek retreats to his New York penthouse with his other model friends, where they decide to go out and get smoothies and drive around to cheer him up. However, after agreeing to start a gas fight with the pumps at a nearby gas station, they all end up dying, aside from Derek, when they think that gas and cigarettes are a good combination. At their funeral, Derek retires from modeling and, seemingly having lost everything, retreats to the safety of his highrise. However, through the condescending interviewer from the beginning scenes, he discovers that male models are secretly made to be trained assassins and that he is secretly assigned to take out the Prime Minister of Malaysia as coordinated by fashion designer Mugatu (Will Ferrel). He gets captured and becomes a sleeper agent whose activation phrase is an old ’80s disco song. Somewhere during all this, he and Hansel make up, and through the power of Derek’s new look “magnum” and Mugatu’s fashion show derelict, they take him down together and save the prime minister of Malaysia, just as the ’80s disco is causing Derek to fade in and out of reality.

The movie uses dramatic irony at every turn. Derek is made out to be so dumb and ignorant that there have to be at least fifty times throughout the film where he is either socially oblivious or cannot answer a general knowledge question that an eight-year-old could. Whether it comes when Derek or Hansel are unintentionally body-shaming someone or mispronouncing every word in the dictionary, the movie makes it clear that the cause for this is the lack of education the male models in the film have received.

The whole movie is seemingly a parody of the actual fashion world, made to exemplify how frivolous and stupid the industry itself really is. It helps its audience realize that maybe they do not have to be so obsessed with following trends or keeping up with the latest clothing drop so that they do not end up turning out like some of the people in the movie. By overstating the importance of things such as clothing, status, and influence, it helps people realize that maybe the smaller things in life are more important instead.

Perhaps, like Zoolander urges us to, we all need to take a step back and realize what is really important and what is superficial.

King Lear Should Be a Comedy

The story of King Lear is not a story that should be seen as being able to change people’s views about themselves and other people. It is a story that was forced to be a tragedy and should Instead be a comedy where the ending is a happy one. The first look into why this is is King Lear himself. King Lear is a well-written character and fits the tragedy story perfectly except for the fact that his fatal flaw doesn’t cause his undoing. Instead, it is the actions of other characters and their flaws that lead to the misguided death of King Lear. Shakespeare has made tragedies with important deaths that mean something. In Romeo and Juliet when both the lovers die at the end it impacts everyone who is still alive and makes them question why they were fighting. The deaths of the main characters in that play mean something to the viewer. It helps us understand what was done wrong and why we shouldn’t do it. Meanwhile, in King Lear, his death comes after Lear has gained the knowledge of how to become a better person. He has already gone through the stages of character progression and at the end of the play is overall a better person. His death signifies to the viewer that no matter how much you change tragedy still follows. For the surviving characters, nothing about King Lear’s journey stays in their heart. The only one who has had any huge direct impact on King Lear, which means they talked and had a friendship shown in the play, is presumed to have killed himself. His death adds no significant value to the story as it is unjust and just pitiful. If King Lear never changed by the end of the play his death would have had an impact showing that to survive you need to get rid of your fatal flaw, but King Lear does manage to get rid of his fatal flaw and still experiences the repercussions of it.

The weight of this sad time we must obey,

Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.

The oldest hath borne most; we that are young

Shall never see so much nor live so long

Edgar delivers this line at the end of the play to sort of deliver to the audience the message that he has changed and because he has changed he managed to live. I believe that the last part that mentions being young is talking about how immaturity and not being able to change will lead to a bad life. The line makes sense for Edgar as he went through a change and survived by the end, but King Lear went through the change and died. If Cordelia died at the end to show how he changed too late it would be a good tragedy. While I do believe that Cordelia was underutilized she works as a way to show that King Lear’s actions were irreversible. His death seems unworthy since by killing him you get rid of his character arc which should have made him a better person and a better king. Instead, it makes it seem like King Lear’s change doesn’t mean anything to the story as it only truly affected him and he is no longer alive to be affected by the change at the end of the story. Instead of dying, I believe that King Lear should have survived to suffer his consequences as a way of showing how his character has changed while maintaining it a tragedy.

The Satire and Reality of “The Truman Show”

The Truman show is a movie that follows the character of Truman Burbank, an insurance salesman whose life unknowingly exists inside a giant domed television set complete with hundreds of homes, an artificial sun and moon, and a massive lake. The “Truman Show”, as it is called in the movie itself, is a 24/7 reality TV broadcast that is streamed worldwide. Everyone apart from Truman, including his wife, best friends, and family, are all actors who are aware that the show exists. Everything Truman does and says is filmed by thousands of cameras all around his hometown. The show is monitored and run by dozens of workers behind the scenes who change camera angles, the weather inside the set, and music headed by a man named Christof. Eventually, Truman begins to notice the strangeness of his world, and begins a journey to uncover the truth and eventually escape the set of the show. While comical and adventurous, the movie itself serves as a larger critique of mass media and the ethics of entertainment.

The movie uses many satirical elements including irony, hyperboles, and parody to critique modern reality TV. The entire premise of “The Truman Show” is deeply ironic. The audience of the world outside the Truman Show set is complicit in deceiving Truman, which mirrors the way that real-world audiences churn through reality TV without considering the ethical implication. Hyberoles also play a part in exaggerating the extent to which the media controls people’s lives. While reality TV doesn’t (yet) raise people from their birth for entertainment, the movie amplifies the invasiveness of media, and how much reality TV characters are monitored and controlled by producers. The movie also makes a parody of the artificiality of advertising on television. Truman’s life is littered with discrete product placement (which eventually Truman begins to notice) with characters strangely holding items towards the camera and dropping sales itching mid conversation. An example of this is that everyday on Truman’s walk to work he is strangely pushed against a poster with some sort of varying advertisement on it, forcing Truman to be an object of advertising against his knowing will. Eventually, Truman escapes the set of the TV show, and while his escape is watched by millions, as soon as the show stops broadcasting with Truman’s exit, all the viewers switch to watching some other TV program. This further parodies and exemplifies the lacking attention span and care of reality TV audiences.

While the Truman shows deeply satirizes media and reality TV, it also delivers a very deep critique of society’s acceptance of media control. The film exposes the broader issue of media violating personal privacies which is wildly more relevant now than at the time of the movie’s creation in 1998. Truman’s final act of choosing to leave his artificial world despite the pleads of Christof symbolizes the importance of questioning reality and seeking the truth. The movie as a whole challenges audiences to reflect on media consumption and their role as spectators, along with the ethical boundaries of television. With the rise of social media and influencers culture furthering erosion of privacy, The Truman Show forces us to consider how much of are lives is shaped by the opinions of media. At what point does entertainment go too far?

“Mr. Griffin Goes to Washington”

The show Family Guy, a long standing comedic and satirical show written by Seth MacFarlane, highlights real world issues over the course of many seasons with many episodes and is known for its edgy humor and is consistently the topic in debates about being politically correct.

One particular episode of Family Guy stood out to me because its message is clearer than some of the other episodes but it is still rich in satire. Season 3, Episode 3 (2001) “Mr. Griffin Goes to Washington” is all about how the toy company that Peter Griffin (the main character) is taken over by a tobacco company. After the takeover, Peter confronts his new bosses about how their new toy designs are clearly meant to market cigarettes towards children. When confronted with this, the head of the tobacco company offers Peter a job as the CEO of the company in order to keep him quiet. Since the job comes with many benefits, Peter accepts. After seeing how Peter operates, the company realizes that he is the perfect puppet for them to control and ends up sending him to Washington D.C to speak to Congress about a new bill. The bill pertains to anti-smoking laws and obviously a tobacco company would want it to not pass.

This episode is most obviously a parody of Frank Capra’s: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington starring James Stewart (1939). By parodying a famous movie that is known for addressing issues regarding power abuse, over half a century later, Family Guy is reinforcing that the message that was most likely received by the audience is exactly what they wanted. This episode built on the foundation that Mr. Smith Goes to Washington had already laid down. Another use of satire in this episode is hyperbole. One particular example is when Peter tells his boss that he can’t come to work that day because he was in a “terrible plane crash” and his whole family died and he is now a “vegetable.” This clearly is Peter exaggerating the situation to get out of work which highlights the absurdity through obvious overstatement. Irony is also flowing throughout this episode, one example being when the tobacco company gives Peter a new CEO parking spot after promoting him, but it is the same exact spot as when he was a regular worker at his toy company. This is representative of how many people in positions of power will pretend like they are giving benefits to those beneath them when in reality, nothing changes but the context of the situation.

All of these techniques are used to openly criticize how people in positions of power consistently take advantage of those who are naive about their end game while also maintaining their welcoming image that resonates with the public. People in positions of power taking advantage of people who are subordinate to them is not a new concept and is prevalent in the new world of mega companies and CEOs. By calling attention to this issue through the use of parody, hyperbole, and irony, Family Guy is ultimately trying to change corporate America and call attention to the issues of power abuse that are so intertwined with our system.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén