Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Date: September 30, 2025

The Existentialism of Elation

In the game Honkai Star Rail, there exists one of my favorite science fiction worlds. Although I’ve mostly stopped playing due to its increasingly predatory gameplay, I still love the lore.

In the HSR universe, someone who reaches the highest point of an ideal ascends and becomes a deity known as an Aeon. They preside over their ideal, or “path” and grant strength to those who believe in it strongly enough. Paths include The Hunt (decisive perseverance), The Erudition (pursuit of knowledge), The Nihility (nihilism), The Beauty (self-explanatory), and my personal favorite, The Elation (existentialism) among others.

The Elation is presided over by the Aeon Aha. It is described as such in game:

“When the Aeon of Elation climbed to the highest branch on the Tree of Existence, they saw the cold and despicable void, the stars operating like machinery, and how the meaning of all things bows before nothingness. They continued looking until they saw a baby fall to the ground and cry because it had been wronged. The Aeon burst into laughter, laughter so clear it tore through the cold universe and still reverberates through the universe today.

[Followers of the Elation] believe that the truth of the world is a joke, and that the ultimate meaning of all things lies in mere laughter. The universe is merciless, but there is joy to eliminate pain, dilute sorrow, resist nihilism, and heal wounds. Laughter, the gift of intelligent races, is the only answer.”

Many of the followers call themselves Masked Fools. This has a double meaning, as they like to take on the role as the universes jesters. They are also disregarded as fools by those who cling to things like love, wealth, and success. The parallels to the lecture on existentialism are clear.

The Aeon Aha (above)

Not a Stranger Anymore

Albert Camus, in his novel, The Stranger, portrays the narrator, Meursault, as a stranger to the people around him and his surroundings. He lives in the moment, speaks as a ‘matter of fact-ly’, and does not make any big decision on his own accord. He waits until an outside force sets an action in motion that he can partake in. For example, when his neighbor Raymond asked Meursault to write a faux testimony to the police about Raymond beating his mistress, Meursault does not think this this is a horrible act, he does not get angry at Raymond, he simply agreed to. His lack of response to Raymond’s plan gave Raymond the impression that Meursault agrees with his outlook on beating the mistress, when in reality, he does not care. He lets others dictate his actions by adhering to whatever task comes across his way. He doesn’t care about the morality of his actions, and this is obvious because of his attitude towards his other neighbor, Salamano, who abuses his dog. But even when it came to providing care for his Maman before she died, Meursault states that he simply put her into a home because he could not afford it. He seemed to lack sadness in that decision, because his financial situation is what ultimately drove him to put her into a home. At the end of Part 1, we see Meursault kill a man. I noticed that leading up to the murder, Meursault describes the sky and the weather with such imagery and detail. “It occurred to me that all I had to do was turn around and that would be the end of it. But the whole beach, throbbing in the sun, was pressing on my back…..It was this burning, which I couldn’t stand anymore, that made me move forward. I knew that it was stupid, that I wouldn’t get the sun off of me” (59). Even when the readers are aware of Meursalt’s feeling on the matter, that he thinks this whole altercation is ‘stupid’, he still advances forward. How is it that the heat of the sun could drive a man against his own morals (the little of it he has left) and any logical thinking to advance so far forward that he kills a man? And also shoots him 4 other times, emptying the pistol that Salamano gave him? I think it is eerie that he is aware of the fact that killing the Arab man would not provide him relief or escape from the sun, but because it was so overbearing, he just kept moving forward.

 

Meursault

Drinking Coffee with Heidi?

“Drinking Coffee Elsewhere”, written by ZZ Packer, explores many themes of race, gender, sexuality, and social norms that Dina, the main character, seems to break or wants to. I relate to her in the sense that acting like I feel like I belong doesn’t get me anywhere sometimes. It seems like everyone knows when I feel out of place, so the solution is to make myself stand out at times. Dina herself immediately tries to establish herself as different from her social setting in the very first page, refusing to do a trust exercise with fellow, white students. ‘”No way,” I said. The white boys were waiting for me to fall, holding their arms out for me, sincerely, gallantly. “No fucking way”‘(49). Dina’s choice of the word gallantly following the word sincerely makes me think that she recognizes the power dynamic at play, but envies the intent behind it. She is annoyed that the ‘white boys’ are conforming to this trust exercise, and have true intentions to go through with the exercise, so she denies their acceptance of their social situation that is ultimately powerful. She wants to signal to everyone around her although they are stuck doing the same exercise, she is not the same as them. It’s reassuring to see others use this same tactic, but sad at the same time. It is incredibly isolating to try to to pretend like you think you are the same as everyone else but still feeling like others see you differently. I think Dina was unable to resolve this feeling very late into her life, which is why she is so emotionally cut off from Heidi and the rest of her peers. She feels like no one else can feel how she feels, when in fact, others do and have found ways to be at peace with their uniqueness. Like Heidi at the LGBTQ+ rally coming out! She must have felt different for a long time, but she was able to face that feeling head on, which is why I think Dina and Heidi were disconnected from each other at the end.

Meaning in the Meaningless

In The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus talks about how life can feel pointless, like pushing a rock up a hill only to have to roll it back down again. Sisyphus is stuck doing the same thing forever, but Camus says he gains his power by just accepting it. Instead of hoping for things to change, he finds a sense of freedom in knowing the truth and still choosing to keep going.

Camus calls this “the absurd”, the idea that we want life to have meaning, but the universe doesn’t give us one. I think that’s a really interesting way to look at things, even if it’s kind of hard to accept.

Sometimes school, jobs, and daily routines feel like that rock, repetitive and pointless. But Camus is saying we can still find purpose by choosing how we respond. It makes me think about how even small efforts have value, even if they don’t lead to anything.

Life might not always have a clear purpose, but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth living. Maybe thats why Camus says we should think of Sisyphus as happy, because he keeps going anyway.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén