in king Lear, Shakespeare dives into the complexities of human nature, exploring the idea of natural evil or adopted evil, in which individual act with Ill intent simple because they are naturally evil. Or guided by a synthetic hope and greed for power as a product circumstances.
Shakespeare intentional use of highlighting the difference can be seen through Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester or the embodiment of evil, although born into illegitimacy and treaded differently as a result, Edmund nature is still derived from pure evil .Shakespeare’s highlights the distinct connection from his very words stated by Edmund “Thou, nature, art my goddess; to thy law my services are bound. “Here Edmund proves his sense of self is from nature laws, not circumstantial. Making one understand his cruel evil spirit is not a product of external influence but natural evil.
whereas Goneril and Regan both adopted this sense of evil. Although not initially bad or ill indented these women were brainwashed by greed and the pursuit of power. King Lear stung by the pain of betray was only betrayed due to their circumstantial wants for power, not because they genuinely wanted to cause havoc and suffering. Which inspires the thought are we born into our nature or developed into it?