Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Author: Sonja E.

I Don’t Blame Regan and Goneril

In King Lear, Regan and Goneril are painted as the ultimate villains. They betray Lear, are power-hungry, step on their husbands to get to Edmund, and Goneril ends up poisoning Regan. There’s no denying they aren’t angels, but when you consider what their lives have been like I don’t think you can blame them. 

First of all, Lear only becomes an empathetic, unselfish person when he has his revelation near the end of the play. We only know him for the duration of the play, and even then we’re frustrated with how stupid he is for the majority of it. This is a man who makes his daughters compete to profess their undying love to him before he’ll give them their inheritance and is dumb enough to believe what they’re saying is true. He clearly has no regard for others because he only realizes he should have been helping the poor out when he is out in the storm with no shelter. Regan and Goneril are middle aged when they finally get their inheritance, which means they’ve been forced to be subservient and respectful to Lear for like 40 something years. Not to mention, Lear makes it clear Cordelia is his favorite daughter. They’ve probably been compared to their perfect, gentle, beautiful sister their whole lives, which would make anyone bitter. If I were them I honestly would have put Lear in a home as soon as I got my power. It’s not like he was a good king or father, so I don’t see any reason why they wouldn’t. 

Additionally, Regan and Goneril seem evil because of their lust for Edmund, but let’s remember that they’ve been forced into marriage with Cornwall and Albany for probably 10-20 years. Cornwall is clearly a jerk, as we saw with his treatment of Gloucester. I think he and Burgundy would’ve been friends because he’s just in it for the power and money. Albany seems like a good guy, but there’s no way Goneril was in love with him. She’s super ambitious and he is a bit of a pushover. There’s nothing wrong with that, but I see it as a successful female entrepreneur being forced to marry a guy who plays video games all day and doesn’t have a job. Furthermore, based on all the bastard children, it seems like it would be likely Cornwall and Albany just called up the village prostitute whenever they wanted. Regan and Goneril were living their lives completely sexually repressed and married to (probably ugly and old) men they didn’t love. Why wouldn’t they go after after Edmund? 

“Tom’s Diner” by Suzanne Vega & DNA Is Poetry

“Tom’s Diner” by Suzanne Vega & DNA is undoubtedly poetry. The song is from the perspective of a woman observing those around her while sitting in a diner. It is written as if we are inside her head, following her thoughts as she is having them. The song is able to convey the experience of feeling detached, as though you are an outsider watching everyone else experience life and not a participant.

It begins with a simple repetition:

Da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da
Da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da
Da-da-da, da-da-da-da
Da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da

This conveys the absent-minded thought of the speaker before she focuses in on those around her. She is not thinking of anything important, really, just sitting in the diner. These lines are repeated throughout the song in between her thoughts. It helps to create the feeling of being inside her head and also separates her from those around her because she is inside her own head as well.

The speaker continues by describing watching the man behind the counter meet a woman. She sees their connection, but she is alone. Then she begins to read the paper, saying

I open up the paper
There’s a story of an actor
Who had died while he was drinking

It was no one I had heard of
And I’m turning to the horoscope
And looking for the funnies

This description further shows her feeling of detachment. She’s reading the story of someone who’s died but there’s nothing to really do about it, so she just flips to the funnies. This is one of the most interesting parts of the song to me because it’s an experience almost everyone has had. We hear sad news or we lose someone and there’s nothing to say or do so eventually we just keep going.

I could list a few other lyrics that show her feeling of disconnect from those around her, but I don’t think I need to. You can listen to the song.

In the final section of the song, the speaker shifts from observing those around her to a reflection on the past, saying

Oh, this rain, it will continue
Through the morning as I’m listening

To the bells of the cathedral
I am thinking of your voice

And of the midnight picnic once upon a time
Before the rain began…

The rain serves as a metaphor for the fog she has felt herself in since she presumably lost this person. I would guess that they are someone she was in love with and they recently broke up. The use of this metaphor and language shows that being with this person allowed the speaker to feel like she was a participant in life, and only since she has lost them does she feel like a detached observer.

Why Beloved Never Really Goes Away

At the end of Beloved things seem to be at least heading in the direction of being resolved. Beloved has run away, Denver is finding work and might go to college, and Paul D. has told Sethe that she is her best thing.

However, Morrison doesn’t just tie everything up in a neat bow for us to feel happy and content with. The townspeople forget Beloved and over time, Denver and Sethe do too. Mostly. Her footprints still appear by the stream, and every now and then they see a flash of something that reminds them of her in a photograph or reflection.

Beloved can never fully disappear because she represents the pain and cruelty of the past. Everyone forgot her as we often forget trauma, blocking her out of their minds. However, a piece of Beloved can’t be forgotten and will always stay with those who have been affected by her, even if it only comes in flashes.

I think that one of Morrison’s main points in the book is that we have to address trauma, but we cannot make the mistake of expecting a complete resolution once we do. Sethe did not address her killing of Beloved, and the baby’s ghost haunted them. Paul D. tried to eradicate her, and she came back in the flesh. Only once Denver addressed Beloved for what she was and the townspeople exorcised her were they able to begin to heal.

Still, like Sethe’s scars will never completely heal, a piece of Beloved will never leave those who have experienced her.

I Really Hate Exit West

Let me start off by saying that I don’t want to offend anybody with this post, it’s only my opinion. If you love this book, I’m truly happy for you because you will be able to get through the next few weeks we spend on it without getting nauseous every few paragraphs. Sorry.

I have a number of issues with Exist West, but I’m most annoyed by Hamid’s cliche and cringey writing. It disrupts what would otherwise be a decent story, and actually angers me. For example, when Saeed asks why Nadia wears her robes if she isn’t religious, she responds, after taking a mysterious sip of coffee, “so men don’t fuck with me” (17). Come on.

I understand that Hamid is attempting to convey Nadia’s badassness and individualism, but he just executes it so poorly. By using cliche lines like that one, Hamid actually diminishes Nadia’s cool factor and makes her seem annoying.

Furthermore, Hamid’s references to drugs do not achieve his intentions, and on multiple occasions have forced me to audibly sigh with disappointment. During Saeed’s first visit to Nadia’s apartment, they smoke a joint. Fine, whatever. But there’s just something about the way Hamid writes about it that is off to me. Maybe it’s that he begins the next chapter with “while Nadia and Saeed were sharing their first spliff together…” (29). Despite his intentions to make this a natural addition to the story, and portray the characters (and himself) as cool, it sticks out and reminds me of a middle school boy trying to impress his crush with his weed expertise.

I’m not even going to get started on the shrooms.

The next thing that bothers me about Exist West is Hamid’s characterization of the war-torn city and the refugees that live there. I can’t put my finger on what the issue is specifically, but it feels strange. Even though Hamid lived in Pakistan till he was eighteen, his writing feels like it’s from the perspective of someone who has researched the Middle East extensively, but never been there. At least to me, something about the way in which he describes the city seems like a gross romanticization rather than the perceptive commentary he is attempting. However, I have never been to the Middle East, so maybe I can’t say much about it.

Last but not least, Hamid’s writing makes me severely uncomfortable, and not uncomfortable in the way that you can grow from. This mostly happens when he writes about sex, but I want to be clear that it’s not the topic of sex that unsettles me, just the way he writes about it.

I first started to feel this way during his description of Saeed’s parents’ sex life. He goes in a weird amount of detail about Saeed’s mom enjoying “being taken from behind,” and describes their headboard as “demanding to be gripped”(14). I think that Hamid was trying to be a little shocking, and add depth and mystique to the book, but it ended up just feeling intrusive and creepy. Most of the time, his descriptions of sex are fine, but there are a few like that one that I really do not like. Another extra weird one I feel like I need to add is when he writes about Saeed beginning to enter Nadia’s thoughts as she “reclined on her toilet after emptying her bladder” (40). There’s nothing that wrong with it, but I hope you all will agree that it’s just a super strange way to say that Saeed is becoming a big part of Nadia’s life. These things aren’t really a big deal, I just wouldn’t want to have a one-on-one conversation with Hamid. Ever.

That wasn’t really my last objection to Exit West, but I can’t list all of them. Overall, I would say that his writing feels infantile and weird, and although I kept trying to like the book, it has disappointed me severely.

 

Dust in the Wind – Kansas

“Dust in the Wind” is pretty reflective of a lot of what Meursault comes to realize at the end of The Stranger. 

In the face of his imminent execution, Meursault realizes that his life has no ultimate meaning other than to be lived, and that the events of life are completely impersonal. This allows him to die happy/content.

Kansas echoes the idea that our actions are ultimately irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, saying “don’t hang on, nothin’ lasts forever but the earth and sky. It slips away. And all your money won’t another minute buy.” Meursault would agree with this– the world doesn’t care what you do.

This idea is continued throughout the song with lyrics like “Just a drop of water in an endless sea. All we do crumbles to the ground, though we refuse to see,” and of course, “all we are is dust in the wind. ” This is also literal, because after death we decompose.

I do think the message of “Dust in the Wind” is slightly more positive than Meursault’s take, more focused on enjoying life while we have it. However, they are essentially saying the same thing: our lives have no real consequence, so we are free to live them the way we want.

We are, after all, just dust in the wind!

Why Do We Want Life To Be Rational?

Yesterday my AP Lit. teacher asked us a few questions to gauge our opinions before reading The Stranger. The majority of the class answered “Agree” to “Life is absurd — full of random, unjustifiable pain and suffering.” The majority of the class also agreed that we believe in love.

This seemed to shock my teacher. How could we believe in love if life was full of unexplainable, undeserving suffering?

I thought this was interesting considering our recent discussion of “The Elephant Vanishes,” in which we talked about our aversion as humans to events which don’t fit into what we deem reasonable. When something occurs that doesn’t make sense to us, we are scared and force ourselves to forget it like the villagers forgot the elephant.

Similarly, random events that cause pain are not rational. Healthy people get sick, bad things happen to good people and good things happen to bad people. The world does not “make sense.”

But why are we so afraid of this? Why would we believe that if this is true, love cannot exist?

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén