Story Power

Blogging the Lit Life

Category: Stranger (Page 1 of 2)

Trust (Movie) Vs. The Stranger

In Trust (1990), written and directed by Hal Hartley, Maria slaps her father just before he collapses and dies. In a similar vein, Albert Camus’s The Stranger opens with the death of Meursault’s mother. Despite their vastly different circumstances, both characters share the bond of having lost a parent.

Meursault’s reaction to his mother’s death is notably detached; he fixates on practical matters like taking time off work and choosing appropriate attire for the funeral. His demeanor comes across as cold, as though he’s brushing off the tragedy.

After arguing with her father, Maria slaps him and leaves the room. He falls to the floor, and when his wife checks for a pulse, Maria returns only to discover he’s no longer breathing. In a fit of rage, her mother blames Maria and kicks her out. Rather than grieving, Maria heads to school to share the news of her pregnancy with her boyfriend. While this is a significant concern for her, it’s striking how she seems unfazed by her father’s death, barely acknowledging it until she eventually moves back in with her family.

I found it intriguing that both stories begin with such tragic events, involving characters with little in common. In Trust, Matthew clearly parallels Meursault, yet I couldn’t help but consider the similarities between Maria and Meursault. Their emotional responses to parental loss raise questions about their pasts and the reasons behind their behavior. The lack of context surrounding these tragedies, especially since they occur at the story’s outset, seems intentional. It adds depth to the characters and invites readers to infer how these experiences have shaped their lives and relationships.

The Stranger – To Whom

We all know ourselves. At least we think we do. The phrase I know you better then I know my own self, signifying kinship between two people. We think that we can control our destiny, make our own choices, influence our own stories. Unfourtunetely  we cannot do whatever we want, due to laws, regulations, and social norms

Meursault takes this predicament into his own hands. He does not obey laws nor conform to anyones expectations or wants from him. He views the world not as his oyster but something that cannot control him. He is passive. He never strives for any achivement or status reveled by society. When his boss asks him “open an office in Paris which would handle his business directly with the big companies.” Meursault refuses saying life does not change and he is contempt with what he has now.

He says ” I’m not unhappy” after declining the work offer, but never in the story does he say he is happy. Only at the end of the book does he finally come to the realization that blatantely disregarding everyone also included himself. Only then when he is alone with his thoughts and feelings does he say he feels happiness.

Is Meursault right?

After reading Meursault’s final speech in the Stranger I have been seriously pondering the meaning of life. From what I gathered it seems like Meursault has taken the stance that life is meaningless. There is no explanation or greater purpose as to why we exist and the only guarantee in life is death. Because of this, Meursault feels no need to commit himself to things like relationships, religion, or a career as it all leads to death. Instead, I have noticed that Meursault leans into following to his natural urges like eating, sleeping, and sexual desires.

When I first figured out his ideology, it made me extremely uncomfortable. I’m a Christian. I believe that life’s meaning can be found through deepening one’s relationship with God. For Meursault to totally reject that thinking and define it as fake deeply troubled me and made me reconsider my own view on life. It’s true, I can’t see or touch these transcendent things like God or love, or even success however I also think we can’t limit ourselves to things that are visible and tangible. Our feelings are extremely real and reflect things in life we may not be able to see.

I think that if Meursault was truly right about life being meaningless and arbitrary then we wouldn’t be such complex beings. Not only are we intricately designed and formed, our minds produce some of the most incredible and elaborate ideas that influence our world. Why would we have these abilities if not for some greater purpose or meaning?

 

 

Maria vs Marie

Maria from Trust and Marie from The Stranger both reflect important aspects of their love interest’s emotional journey, but they manifest themselves differently.

In The Stranger, Marie symbolizes the rest of society, having normal emotions and wanting to take her relationship with Meursault to the next level. However, Meursault remains emotionally indifferent, even when Marie expresses her love and desire for marriage. Marie is just a physical presence to Meursault, not an emotional partner. Because Meursault and Marie are not connected on a deeper level, they cannot help each other grow and improve, so Meursault stays emotionally detached.

Maria in Trust, on the other hand, plays an active role in transforming Matthew’s life as well as her own journey of self-discovery and growth. The deep connection she forms with Mathew causes her to become more self-aware and empowered. In return, Maria helps Mathew overcome his cynicism by offering him trust and love. Contrasting with The Stranger, Trust shows that relationships can lead to healing and personal growth.

Dead Parents in The Stranger vs Trust

In Trust (1990) written and directed by Hal Hartley, Maria slaps her father shortly before he collapses to the ground, dying. Similarly, in The Stranger by Albert Camus, Meursault’s mother dies in the beginning of the book. Although these are two very different characters in different situations in life, they bond over having lost a parent.

Meursault’s initial reaction to his mother’s loss is less concerned with her actual situation, and more detail oriented. He is focused on things like taking time off work for her funeral and what he will wear. Generally, his actions come off as cold, as if he shrugged the entire tragedy off his shoulder.

After an argument with her father, Maria slaps him, leaving the room. In the kitchen, he falls to the ground, where his wife checks his pulse. Maria comes back into the room, and upon realizing that he no longer was breathing, Maria’s mom screams at her, kicking her out. Rather than being concerned about her father, Maria heads to school to tell her boyfriend that she is pregnant. Although her pregnancy is a valid concern of hers, I would expect her to show at least some emotion or thought towards her family. She seems to move on unfazed from his death, not really mentioning it again until she moved back in with her family.

I thought it was interesting that both stories began with incredibly unfortunate situations to characters who did not have a ton in common. In Trust, Matthew is clearly representing Meursault, but I couldn’t help but ponder about the similarities between Maria and Meursault. Them both having this trauma response to their parent’s death made me question what had happened in their past, and why they acted this way. Not much context was given in the situations since both tragedies happened at the start, and I think that may have been intentional to add depth to the characters, and to let the reader possibly infer what had happened, and how it had altered the characters and their relationships.

Relationship Between Matthew and Meursault

When we watched “Trust”, most of my thoughts revolved around the question of how the movie connected to The Stranger. I think the easy connection to make is about how the characters differ from society around them. One of Maria’s reasons for being interested in Matthew is that he is patently himself. This would be an apt way to describe Meursault.

But both characters are not as simple as opposition to the general trends of society or the world around them. They are actually not even the same. They are opposed to each other in almost every possible way. Meursault is a man that has his life together in the first act. He seems to be living a normal life while not giving much of any attention to the world around him. Matthew, on the other hand, is lost. He can’t stand to see other people disregarding quality or watching TV. These are the thoughts of a man that cares deeply about the details of the world.

Meursault and Matthew’s actions may seem similar but they are actually motivated by completely opposing views. This is why Matthew gets so frustrated all the time. He hates seeing how other people live and he hates what is going on around him. Meursault couldn’t care less.

What is Meursault guilty for?

After I read the trial scene in The Stranger I kept thinking about how Meursault was mostly judged on his past actions and not the actions that actually took place surrounding the murder.

While Meursault was getting interrogated, and witnesses being brought to the stand, they were not being asked about the murder. Rather, they were being asked on Meursaults actions in the past. This includes his mothers funeral and the day he met Marie. The prosecutor after hearing all the different witnesses said “The same man who the day after his mother died was indulging in the most shameful debauchery killed a man f0r the most trivial of reasons and did so in order to settle an affair of unspeakable vice” (96). Later, Meursault thinks “there was a lot said about me, maybe more about me than about my crime” (98).

All these moments stood out to me because it seemed that instead of determining whether he committed a murder, they were trying to see how he differed from what society believes is right. Going on a “dubious liaison” – as the prosecutor calls it – with Marie the day after his mothers funeral, is wrong in the view of the people. You should be mourning the loss of your mother, not forgetting about it the next day. Meursault says that after the prosecutor stated his belief on him, the jury did not listen to all the ‘good’ things his friends had to say, most likely because they already had a picture of the person Meursault is. This one piece of information about himself, altered the view of jury. He was not guilty of the murder, but rather being a person who stands out among the rest. He is not seen as normal, based on his past actions with his mother and Marie.

I think the trial showed that society does not like things in cannot control. It fears the fact that Meursault is an outsider, and used his previous actions to justify it.

 

How Can Isolation Affect People’s Relationships?

In both “The Stranger” and in the film “Trust” the idea of isolation shows up multiple times, affecting characters and their relationships with others.

In “The Stranger” by Albert Camus, the protagonist Meursault seems to be very emotionally detached. Following his mothers death he goes on as if nothing had happened. He drinks coffee, smokes, and even picks up a girl to go have fun with. To add on he even refers to Marie as a robot, which shows just how surface level he thinks of her and how he lacks showing affection to others around him. The emotional indifference and lack of relationship Meursault presents to the readers really just shows how much he can isolate himself both mentally and physically.

Similarly in the film “Truth” by Hal Hartley, characters Matthew and Maria also adhere to the idea of isolation. Maria’s struggle with her pregnancy as well as the treatment by her mother, leaves her longing for some sort of connection. Matthew is so disconnected from his own emotions, he struggles with finding purpose in his life. These characters both struggling with feelings of isolation and worthlessness, however, they find each other and connect on a deeper meaning due to their mutual recognition.

These two different stories explore the complexity of deeper connection in a world that doesn’t always feel easy to do so.

Why is Marie so merry?

When reading The Stranger, I can’t help but wonder, why is Marie, someone so cheerful, attracted to Meursault, who is quite the opposite? I think Marie is insecure of herself, so she tries to convince Meursault to love her. Even when he says he is indifferent to a potential marriage, she would settle for that and opt to be with him. When he murders someone, she acts as a witness for him and defends him, despite her getting nothing out of their relationship. I think Marie connects to the Myth of Sisyphus, in the way that trying to love Meursault is like pushing a heavy rock up a mountain. You can enjoy the journey and love the chase, but you will never win. Meursault is a project that Marie can never fix, despite her bubbly personality. She  must find love within herself so she stops seeking it from others who won’t give it to her.

Mutual Recognition in Trust and The Stranger

Mutual recognition, the idea that individuality is reliant upon other’s recognition of you and your recognition of them, is present in both Trust by Hal Hartley and The Stranger by Albert Camus. However, compared to Trust, there is a lack of mutual recognition in the relationships portrayed in The Stranger.

In The Stranger, Meursault and Marie are in a relationship. However, it is clear that they see this relationship very differently. When Marie asks him if he wants to marry her, he doesn’t care. Additionally, he rarely says anything about her other than short comments about her looking pretty. Though we can assume Marie recognizes him as an individual based on her evident care for him throughout the book and during his trial, it seems that Meursault is lacking this recognition. The reader knows very little about Marie because of his lack of attention on her and his comments about her looks lead the reader to believe that he sees her as an object.

There is clear mutual recognition in Trust, a stark difference from The Stranger. In Trust, both Maria and Matthew care deeply about each other. They want one another to escape their toxic families so that they can live better lives. Matthew is willing to work a job he hates to give Maria a stable life and Maria is willing to risk her life to help save him. If they didn’t think of each other as individuals, neither of them would have done the things they did to support the other. Their relationship was one of mutual recognition, unlike Meursault and Marie’s.

Trust & The Stranger, More Alike Than Expected

The film Trust (1990) centers around Matthew and Marie, two people who are mistreated by those they know because they do not conform to societal norms. This film and Albert Camus’s The Stranger have strong parallels between them in terms of an overarching absurdist message.

The first similarity between Trust and The Stranger is the main characters’ relationship with work. Meursault is offered a promotion but refuses due to the fact that he would have to move to Paris, which he thinks is a physically unappealing place. Matthew believes that television is evil and would rather use his repairman skills to fix radios and other older forms of technology. He attempts to negotiate a salary of 2/3 of what he would be given, just because he does not want to work fixing televisions. Marie works at a metal pressing factory since she dropped out of school because of her pregnancy. She is unhappy doing it and eventually decides to quit and go back to school. All three characters attempt to live their life in a way that would bring them the most joy and reject monetary incentives to do so.

Another similarity is the dynamics of the characters with their families. Meursault feels little pain in the death of his mother, family to him is a construct and he does not owe her anything. Matthew’s father and Marie’s mother are both abusive people, Matthew’s father beats him and Marie’s mother severely manipulates her. They immediately recognize that the other person’s parent is not good for the other person but accept when their own parent acts in a harmful way towards them since they feel that they are stuck with them. Both Marie and Matthew would be happier if they followed the absurdist philosophy and left together, discarding the system of family as Matthew suggested in his pseudo “marriage proposal”.

The last connection I spotted was the fact that all three characters intentionally lashed out at the world which resulted in their own detriment. Meursault shoots the Arab resulting in his execution, Marie slaps her father resulting in his death, and Matthew pulls the pin to the hand grenade at his old job resulting in his arrest. All three of these characters’ actions were products of them not agreeing with the flawed societies they live in, and rejecting those systems in the most extreme ways possible. Despite the glaring negatives that result from these actions there are positives as well. Marie and Matthew would never have met if her father hadn’t died, Meursault would never have had his revelation if he had not been imprisoned, and Matthew wouldn’t have known that Marie truly loved him if he hadn’t pulled the pin.

Perhaps the best way to live life is to consider absurdism to an extent, reaping the rewards that benefit one’s self but avoiding going too far and falling off the cliff.

Mindset vs. Contentment

Like Sisyphus, Meursault experiences “true freedom” after embracing his unfavorable condition. Both characters experience an epiphany that transforms their thinking into that of an absurdist.  Despite being physically imprisoned, both manage to achieve a form of mental liberation by altering their mindsets. To them, physical torture and isolation are no longer punishments but rather a natural aspect of being human.

The absurdist belief almost seems to express that freedom is a state of mind. Though their situations differ, they find an escape by shifting their focus from external conditions to internal awareness.  Sisyphus finds pleasure in his constant persistence and Meursault expresses joy in his rejection of societal expectations. They both feel content in the face of horrible circumstances by changing their thinking. While these examples are extreme, I believe they accurately demonstrate how powerful your mindset really is. It can transform even the most constrictive conditions into a sense of freedom.

 

The Problem with Existentialism

Existentialism is a concept that frustrates a lot of people. The idea that the people they love, the God they believe in and the success they achieve are absolutely meaningless. It seems almost impossible to think about. Due to this, not many people tend to believe in existentialism at all. It’s a frustrating, and demoralizing concept that if we are being honest, we would be better off not thinking about it. The stranger demonstrates existentialism very well, but the main character is killed for his way of living, and, from the outside view, he would be better off experiencing emotions and reality through a more “standard” way. None of this, though, is my problem with existentialism. My problem with the concept is that unless you are somehow born into a state of existentialism (which we are to assume Meursault was?) it is seemingly impossible to grow into. What I mean is this- every single decision we make is the result of the system we were born into. Go to school, go to college, care for you family, believe in God- whatever the system that you were introduced to through your upbringing greatly influences the way you think and act. It makes up your character. So how is it possible to “free your mind”, throw away everything you know and somehow live for yourself. To simply not care about your family, about your religion, about your life. Even if you were to attempt to do this, you would be doing it in opposition of the systems you live in, which would mean that you understand what you “should” be doing and are simply doing the opposite. This isn’t even existentialism, it’s simply rebellion. For example, after being raised to care for your parent’s all your life, choosing to not care for them would be denying the emotions that you definitely have for them, which is simply denying your emotions, not actually living without care. Unless some sort of crazy (not spiritual, because “spiritual” is a made up concept) mind freeing (not ritual, because a ritual is a made up concept) thing is possible, existentialism isn’t. In my opinion.

Next Step: Stop Motion?

It boggles my mind that none of the adaptations of The Stranger by Albert Camus have been created through stop motion.

While stop motion was initially used to create scenes otherwise requiring CGI, more recently it has also been used as a medium for creators to express very specific, semi unconventional, film styles. Similarly to how The Stranger does not follow the traditional story format (lack of chapter cliff hangers, relatively straightforward sentence structures), stop motion is often created with the intentions to “break the rules.”

A personal favorite example is Fantastic Mr. Fox, the 2009 film directed by Wes Anderson. Not only are a wide variety of materials used, but the movie pushes the limits of perspectives as well as 2 versus 3 dimensional scenes. The ability to shoot any scene however the director desires would make converting the oddness of the life within The Stranger into a visual form so much more fluid.

Character designs in stop motion, like animation, are also malleable in the sense that they can be as distinct as the material requires. For The Stranger this would mean defining the secondary characters as foils on different levels than just their actions. Visually, these foils, or characters whose personal traits are used to emphasize those of the main character, could contrast through differences in colors, sizes, and shapes. Not only would this allow the relationships between the main character, Meursault, and others to be more clearly defined on the screen, but it would help the characters retain their complexity as well.

I am not certain that every book should be adapted into a film, but doing so for The Stranger, especially if done well (so in my opinion through stop motion), would allow more people to access the material. This content directly challenges our society and how we function within it, so increasing the accessibility to this story may be an important next step.

The Stranger & the Seinfeld Finale

As I was reading the second half of The Stranger, the court case reminded me a lot of the final episode of Seinfeld. Meursault’s case in The Stranger was based heavily off his character, in fact there was barely any actual discussion of his crime. The prosecution brought in nearly every character Meursault introduced us to during the novel. They all gave testimonies that were mainly about his behaviors, habit, personality, and general disposition. The case resulted in Meursault being put to death.

Seinfeld‘s “The Finale” pays a direct homage to Camus in the way they finished the television show. In “The Finale” the four main characters, Jerry, George, Kramer, and Elaine, are caught making fun of a person being robbed at gun point. They are charged the newly instated “good Samaritan law” that allows bystanders to be prosecuted if they decide not to help a person in potential harm. They are taken to court, and just like Meursault, the prosecution brings lots of witnesses. Nearly every side character from all nine seasons of Seinfeld are brought to testify against them. Everyone tells their story and how the main characters have wronged them. The judge comes to the verdict that they are terrible people and gives them a year of prison.

I was always a fan of the way Seinfeld ended despite controversy from the fan base. As I watched it for the first time and as I re watched it I always enjoyed seeing characters I forgot about. It was definitely on a smaller scale in The Stranger, but I still enjoyed it in a similar way.

Dozing off for a while

While reading The Stranger by Albert Camus, I couldn’t help but notice how frequently Meursault falls asleep, or as he likes to say “dozing off”.

At the start of the story, while Meursault is with the nurse and the caretaker, he describes how nice his coffee is, and the smell of the flowers, however, he never talks about how he’s feeling about his dead mother. He includes that he thinks he “dozed off for a while” (9). Interestingly, he says he thinks he dozed off, which seems as if he isn’t really paying attention to what’s going on with his mother. Furthermore, after Meursault and Marie get into an argument about Raymond and Marie leaving, Meursault dozed off. The way Meursault described how he and Marie were getting along that day seemed rather negative. After she left and Meursault had nothing to do, he “slept a while” (37). It seems as if Meursault is constantly sleeping in order to hide his feelings or to pass time. Obviously, Meursault is constantly taking a nap, however, how is this significant to the story and his character? Why does Meursault always doze off and how does it relate to him as a character?

“Maman died today”

One of the most interesting parts of Albert Camus’ The Stranger is Meursault’s relationship to his mother. While, in the end, Meursault’s perceived lack of love for his mother led to him being sentenced to death, numerous moments throughout the text implied that he did care about her. Just after he arrives at the old people’s home, he states that he wants to see his mother right away (4). He calls her “Maman,” an endearing term suggesting that he cares for her. Still, he is quickly distracted by the director and from that point becomes entirely focused on the world around him, no longer concerned with seeing his mother.

Meursault quickly moves on from any disruption caused by the death, meeting up with Marie the very next day.

However, Meursault references his mother continually throughout the rest of the story. As Meursault is very independent, it stands out when he talks about another person, and especially when he takes advice from them. Almost every time he thinks about his mother, he thinks about advice that she gave him or he took from her. At the end of the book, Meursault makes connections between the end of her life and the end of his. He states, “Maman must have felt free then and ready to live it all again. Nobody, nobody had the right to cry over her. And I felt ready to live it all again too” (122). Meursault’s mother had such a strong influence on him that she was one of the last things he thought of.

“It Doesn’t Matter”

Throughout the book, Meursault uses the phrase “It doesn’t matter” often to reflect his detached attitude and lack of emotion. Initially, specifically during times of loss and sadness, he uses this word to set himself apart from society standards and expectations. By the book’s end, though, it has transformed into an effective statement of his independence.

This statement, spoken by Meursault after facing his fate, indicates an honest acceptance of life’s basic meaninglessness. It shows his rejection of the social constraints to justify pain or uphold moral standards. Rather, he accepts the idea that nothing can genuinely have meaning—not even life and death—because existence itself is random.

The statement also refers to a larger existential topic, which is the idea that people must find meaning for themselves in a heartless the universe. By stating that “it doesn’t matter,” Meursault breaks free from the demands made of him. In this acceptance, he finds a sense of calm and liberty, even in the face of death.

In the end, this scene shows Meursault’s character’s transformation, from emotional distance to a deep realization of independence through acceptance. It highlights the main point of the book, which is that living really can bring comfort even in a lack of answers from the universe.

Physical Needs vs. Mentality

A certain line caught my eye while reading the last part of The Stranger by Albert Camus. It’s in the first paragraph on page 65 when Meursault is conversing with his lawyer. Meursault mentions that “my physical needs often got in the way of my feelings.” This line really got me thinking, because throughout the novel I had been trying to reason and relate with the way Meursault acts as a means of understanding him better. However, up until this point in the story, I hadn’t come up with a good way to describe Meursault’s actions.

Reading this line made me look back and I realized that throughout the book this statement Meursault makes holds true. He constantly complains about the sun and how hot he is at his mother’s funeral, at the beach before he kills the Arab, and even somewhat at the courthouse. His relationship with Marie is almost purely physical, at least from his perspective. If he is in a situation where he is physically uncomfortable or doesn’t feel good, he wants to leave it as soon as possible.

While in my previous post, I credited Meursault for living a carefree life, I now see that more than anything Meursault is a weak human. He has no mental strength, or rather, no ability to surpass situations that he finds physically uncomfortable. Meursault does not have the ability to endure, and I believe that even if he was put in an extreme situation this would hold true. Although The Stranger at its core is about the absurdity of life, I took more meaning away from this single line than the entirety of the last part of the book after Merusault meets with the Chaplain.

The Sun: The Pressure to Conform

The sun follows Meursault throughout his journey in The Stranger. At his mother’s burial ad when he kills the Arab, the sun beats down on our protagonist. Then, on death’s door, the sun is noticeably absent and the nighttime sky is left to comfort Meursault in his final moments. The sun’s presence reminds Meursault of the expectations of society. When walking to bury his mom, the sun induces a great sweat, seemingly compensating for the lack of tears welling in Meursault’s eyes with a bodily equivalent. When killing the Arab, the sun blinds Meursault, trying desperately to prevent him from seeing his mark, to save him from killing him and ending his own life. In these moments, the sun antagonizes Meursault, trying to reign him into societal norms. And so, Meursault resents the sun. He feels its oppressive presence and rejects it. It is logical then, that when he finally accepts his individual reality, the sun no longer nags at him. He is freed from his subjugation beneath it and is allowed to look at the stars.

The Stranger and the Sun

Throughout the course of The Stranger, the Sun and temperature is emphasized at different points throughout the story. During Maman’s funeral, the sun is “bearing down” and the heat is “inhuman and oppressive” (15). And the heat of the sun is mentioned again when Meursalt is about to shoot the Arab. Meursalt even thinks that “the sun was the same as it had been the day I’d  buried Maman” (58). And finally, during Meursalt’s trial the heat is mentioned again. He observes that “it was getting hotter, and I could see people in the courtroom fanning themeselves with newspapers” (86).

All three of these moments are very important to the development in the story. Maman’s funeral is an event that’s referenced many times throughout the book and is important to Meursalt’s character development. Meursalt shooting the Arab is a pivotal moment in the book that leads to his imprisonment and sets up the entire second half of the book. And the trial is anther hugely important event that leads to Meursalt being executed. Meursalt is a character that doesn’t experience emotions very often, but during these moments, Meursalt is forced to confront his feelings because of the seriousness of the events. I believe that Meursalt notices the stifling heat in these moments because they force him into a situation where he’s not sure how to react and he feels trapped.

Because of this I find it interesting that right before Meursalt’s execution, instead of feeling heat, he says that “smells of night, earth, and salt air were cooling my temples” (122). His execution is one of the most important events in the book which makes it confusing that instead of emphasizing the sun, like Camus normally does in moments like these, he mentions the cool night. But unlike the other moments when the sun is mentioned, Meursalt knows exactly what he’s thinking and feels free. Meursalt no longer feels a stifling heat because he fully understands his belief about life and it sets him free.

The Choices VS. Actions

Albert Camus’s The Stranger explores the challenge of finding meaning in an inherently meaningless world and the struggle to accept this reality. The novel confronts the absurdity of existence and death, with a connnection to humanity’s quest for truth.

Throughout the story, Meursault demonstrates a striking indifference to significant life events, such as his mother’s death and his own act of murder,these would typically reveal deep emotional responses. During his trial, the focus shifts away from the crime itself to an examination of his character, illustrating society’s compulsion to impose meaning where there is none. Meursault embodies the notion of life’s meaninglessness; his actions and emotions lack any discernible pattern or purpose.

In our class discussions, we’ve grappled with the novel’s themes while analyzing Meursault’s behavior, only to arrive at the unsettling conclusion that everything is ultimately devoid of meaning.

The Stranger- Making Sense of Nothing

Albert Camus’s The Stranger articulates the difficulty in making sense of a world that is inherently meaningless and having to accept it. The novel challenges the absurdity of our existence and death contrasting with the search for the truth of life.

Throughout the novel Meursault shows indifference to serious life events, like his mother dying and killing someone, that typically involve many emotions. Furthermore, when Meursault is on trial, the reader sees throughout the trial the focus is on his character and not the actual crime he committed. Both these examples exemplify society’s need to make sense out of something when there is no meaning. I understand it as Meursault represents the meaningless of life. There is no rhyme or rhythms to his actions or emotions.

Similar to what we do in class, we have been attempting to make sense of the novel along with analyzing Meursault’s actions, yet we come to the conclusion that everything is meaningless.

 

The “Natural” Way to Die

In The Stranger, Meursault frequently uses the word “naturally,” particularly in relation to death. For instance, towards the end of the novel, he remarks, “It doesn’t matter whether you die at thirty or at seventy, since in either case other men and women will naturally go on living” (114). Meursault’s perspective acknowledges the inevitability of death as a fundamental aspect of existence. This understanding is evident in his lack of remorse for killing the Arab; he perceives it as an intrinsic part of life.

Furthermore, he holds the belief that his impending death sentence does not significantly impact his life due to this “natural” conviction. He expresses, “…everyone knows life isn’t worth living” (114), underscoring his perception of life’s insignificance. His demeanor of neutrality and emotional detachment stems from his awareness that everything will ultimately come to an end, leading him to not assign substantial value to aspects of his life.

Meursault’s use of the word “naturally” reflects his acceptance of the natural order of life and death, and his belief that these events occur without the need for justification or emotional attachment. This perspective shapes his behavior and actions, leading to his unconventional responses to events and relationships throughout the novel. It also highlights the existential themes present in the story, as Meursault grapples with the meaning of life and the inevitability of death in a seemingly indifferent world.

Is it Really That Hard to Talk to Women? – The Stranger

An important aspect of The Stranger, written by Albert Camus, is the main character’s monotone narration and his relationships with his surrounding environment. His nonchalant attitude towards the circumstances around him, particularly regarding his mother and the love interest of the story, Marie, add to the dehumanization a reader may feel about him. His attitude and emotional disconnect throughout the first part all but enforce the idea to the reader that Mersault is a husk of a man, without anything keeping him emotional connected to the real world. Some may say that his coping mechanism is valid, and to a certain extent I would agree as it is not my place to judge, however he isn’t sure how he is supposed to feel as made evident by is interaction with the man at the retirement home.

So throughout this story we are given a protagonist that is essentially a robot, made evident by his internal narration through short, cut sentences and his interactions with Marie. He constantly shows that he has no emotional investment with Marie, after she persistently asks if she loves him to his dismissive tone. However the narration in Mersault’s head becomes vivid when he is talking about nature, specifically the beach, to separate his mood from his usual monotone and seemingly disinterested self. It is unclear so far if this is something that makes him feel more alive or human, or just vivid narration intermittently sprinkled throughout the book, however this could be the key to Mersault becoming more of a human in the reader’s eyes.

Longing for Feeling or Apathy?

It is no secret that Meursalt from Albert Camus’ The Stranger is a bit of an odd guy. The first chapter of the story begins with him finding out about his mother’s death. However, Meursalt remains fixated on the days he will take off of work to attend her funeral rather than her death itself. His mind always seems to be somewhere else, atypical of what most ‘normal’ people would be thinking. That being said, he appears to live a pretty normal life. He enjoys swimming, has friends at a local restaurant, and gets along well with his neighbors. Despite this, that odd feeling in his thoughts remains. It is as if something in his life is missing. Multiple times throughout the text, Meursalt claims something along the lines of, “does it really matter?”, such as when he was offered a new role in his job by his boss. It is clear Meursalt is somewhat apathetic, or as if he is missing something that leads him purpose in life. However, this changes when he picks up the gun given to him by Raymond and shoots his mistress’ brother.

Meursalt’s descriptions in the text were typically rather bleak. However, when he was on the beach by himself, this changes. He notices the mistresses’ brother, who of course he did not like because of his incident with Raymond. Armed with the gun, he finds the opportunity to shoot and kill him. Of course his death was an unexpected turning point in the story, but that was not the only thing that changed throughout this scene. Suddenly, Meursalt begins to give an incredibly detailed description of the setting. As he stands on the beach, the bright sun beats down in his eyes, weathering him. As he is about to shoot, his detailed descriptions of the gun provide a crystal clear image of the situation, something I didn’t feel at any other point in the story. He shoots, then kills the brother, finishing him off with four more shots. During this event, Meursault felt like a different character to me, raising a ton of questions in my mind. He suddenly was illuminated and began to think completely different. The complex descriptions were shocking and took me by surprise in comparison to the bleakness of before. I couldn’t help but question what came to him in that moment. Was it getting revenge on the brother for attacking his friend? The adrenaline of shooting and killing someone? His sudden feelings were a stark contradiction to his past which seemed apathetic. Although I haven’t read further in the story, I think this event will remain significant, and says a lot about Meursault’s emotions. Had the gun caused him to feel strong emotions that he had been longing for? Or perhaps it a moment of panic, where he was so overwhelmed with emotion that he didn’t know what to do, shooting and killings the brother just to alleviate his thoughts.

It’s Not His Fault?

While reading The Stranger, I can’t help but notice how many times Meursault has to clarify to his boss that the death of his maman is not his fault.

On the very first page of the book he describes his interaction with his boss when explaining why he would have to take off work for his mothers funeral. He says “I even said, ‘It’s not my fault.'” At first I didn’t think anything of it, but after noticing it again I went back found that he says something along those lines four times just within the first three chapters. For me, the most interesting time is on page 20 when Meursault tells Marie that his Maman died yesterday, he says “I felt like telling her it wasn’t my fault, but I stopped myself because I had already said that to my boss.” The fact that’s he’s gone to justify his time over four times is clearly intentional, but what does it add to the story? How does Meursault’s obsessive need to justify his time off add to his character?

Toxic Masculinity within The Stranger

Multiple times throughout the story, my mouth was gawked wide open. Almost half of the stories we’ve read have had disgusting men as prominent figures, which I don’t think is a bad thing to promote, since most men in our world are disgusting.

Meursault, our main protagonist, has interactions that are often devoid of genuine emotional engagement, particularly in moments that a normal sincere person would have a deeper emotional response to. For instance, his reaction to his mother’s death is strikingly indifferent as he prioritizes dull details over mourning. Additionally his relationship with Marie lacks depth, as he approaches intimacy with a non-chalant attitude that strips the whole relationship of significance, and sadly Marie still has feelings for this man. Meursault’s new friend Raymond also exemplifies toxic mascuilinity, engaging in in manipulative and abusive behaviors.

This dissection of male figures shows the absurdity and often grotesque nature of human relationships, which shows the troubling representations of masculinity in literature.

The Stranger – Is Meursault’s Indifference Real??

In The Stranger, we meet a man whose mother has just died. We expect to see him fall apart or have his world shattered, crying, grieving, and searching for answers. Instead, we see him sleep and smoke. Meursault seems to lack any type of emotion for his dead mother, even as people who knew her for a fraction of the time break down around him. At first, I thought this was just his way of grieving. Pretending like nothing happened and trying to go on as normal. But soon it was clear that he wasn’t trying to pretend like things were normal, everything was normal, he just didn’t care about anything. Camus seemed to point this out when he described the robot-like lady on page 43 who seemed to be so invested and care so much about every little thing she was doing. Meursault, in contrast, cared so little about what he was doing that he got up with no intentions but to aimlessly follow this lady.

He also showed his indifference to Marie. He initially was very invested and even at one point admitted he loved her, but then claimed that he wouldn’t care if she loved him back. If he loved her, how could her love not make a difference? Meursault’s callback to the quote “It’s not my fault,” on page 3 and 20 indicates that he has some kind of personal investment in his mother’s death, even if his actions say otherwise. This makes me wonder whether or not he truly doesn’t feel anything, or if he is simply too scared of losing Marie or feeling the pain of loosing Maman to admit that it affects him?

Why I think Albert Camus’ Writing Strategy Is So Interesting

After beginning The Stranger by Albert Camus, the most noticeable aspect to the book is the writing strategy that Camus uses. Through short, basic vocab and simple, fast sentences, the strategy somehow creates a complex story.

Why is this writing strategy so interesting? Why is something so simple so effective for the telling of this story? I think it’s because we rarely see a style as simple as this (especially in a school-assigned book) and because it perfectly represents the main character.

In most books we’re assigned, It’s usually a pretty dense, hard-to-understand topic that’s written with thick paragraphs and complicated vocab, but The Stranger is different. This book uses simple, easy-to-read sentences and vocabulary, but still has a dense, supported story that still has so much to be revealed, even though we are almost more than halfway through the book.

I think this writing strategy also represents Meursault’s monotone, unemotional personality that he has displayed throughout the story. The basic, short sentences can represent his basic thought process, and the simple vocab can represent his monotone view on life and his experiences.

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén